A Study Investigating the Efficacy of Various Wound Closure Devices in Reducing Postoperative Wound Complications

September 13, 2021 updated by: NYU Langone Health

A Single-center, Phase IV, Randomized, Prospective Study Investigating the Efficacy of Various Wound Closure Devices in Reducing Postoperative Wound Complications

A single-center, phase IV, randomized, prospective study investigating the efficacy of various wound closure devices in reducing postoperative wound complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The zipper wound technology is a new wound closure device that is an alternative to the commonly used conventional staples and sutures. The device acts like a scaffold to stabilize the adjacent sides of a wound in order to minimize forces that can disrupt normal healing of the skin. The other treatment groups include monocryl + Dermabond (conventional sutures and skin adhesive glue) and polyester mesh + Dermabond. All products have been FDA approved. A randomized control trial will provide the highest level of evidence without altering the potential risks to the patient as all three wound closure techniques have been found to have comparable complication rates. The three different treatment devices will be administered following the normal standard of care. All three wound closure devices are currently being used at NYULMC. No modifications to the normal standard of practice other than the randomization process will be implemented. Given the nature of the application of the wound closure device, which will be visible to the surgeon at the time of application and the patient postoperatively, the study will not be blinded to either the surgeon or the patient. Prior to discharge, a blinded plastic surgeon will be asked to assess the wound based on comesis and overall quality of wound healing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are undergoing joint arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment of total joint replacement surgery at an outside institution

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Zipper surgical skin closure
Zipper surgical skin closure device applied to the most superficial layer of skin following a joint arthroplasty
The device acts like a scaffold to stabilize the adjacent sides of a wound in order to minimize forces that can disrupt normal healing of the skin.
Active Comparator: Monocryl + Dermabond
Monocryl suture plus Dermabond is a commonly used combination of wound closure techniques today.
conventional sutures and skin adhesive glue
Active Comparator: Polyester mesh + Dermabond
The polyester plus Dermabond closure techniques combines the OCA topical skin adhesive with a flexible, self-adhesive polyester mesh that has proven to reduce wound cosure times and have a significant greater skin holding strength than skin staples or subcuticular sutures in one study
conventional sutures and skin adhesive glue

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain
Time Frame: 4 Days
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. A patient is asked to indicate his/her perceived pain intensity along a horizontal line, and this rating is then measured from the left edge. The total range of score is 0-10; the higher the score the worse the pain (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable).
4 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ran Schwarzkopf, NYU Langone Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-02020

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthropathy

Clinical Trials on Zipper surgical skin closure

3
Subscribe