Combination of Paroxetine CR and Quetiapine for the Treatment of Refractory Generalized Anxiety Disorder

March 20, 2014 updated by: Naomi M. Simon, Massachusetts General Hospital
The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of quetiapine for generalized anxiety disorder patients who remain symptomatic despite treatment with paroxetine CR.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a relatively common condition affecting 5% of the population, with a typically chronic course and associated with significant psychosocial impairment and decreased quality of life (Schweizer, 1995). Although a number of therapeutic agents demonstrate some efficacy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder, only a minority of anxious patients experience remission with initial treatment.

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of one strategy, the addition of quetiapine, for the treatment of patients with GAD who remain refractory despite an adequate treatment trial with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). This is an investigator-initiated augmentation study of an already approved drug for a different indication. Quetiapine is a novel antipsychotic agent with potent effects at the serotonergic, as well as dopaminergic receptor, and a more favorable side effect profile than standard neuroleptics, including a low potential to cause extrapyramidal symptoms.

This is a two phase, 18-week research study in which participants who remain symptomatic at the end of one phase (10 weeks) enter into the next phase. In phase I, all participants receive paroxetine CR (Paxil CR) for 10 weeks. Participants who continue to have anxiety symptoms will enter the 8-week Phase II, in which they continue taking Paxil CR and they will also be randomly assigned (by chance, like a flip of a coin) to receive quetiapine (Seroquel) or placebo (contains no active medication).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female outpatients, age 18-72.
  • Primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder.
  • Patients on concurrent benzodiazepines will be entered into the trial if they remain symptomatic despite stable doses for at least one month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women or other women of child bearing potential not using acceptable means of birth control
  • Patients with a primary diagnosis of major depression, dysthymia, panic disorder or social phobia.
  • Patients with current or history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or other psychotic conditions
  • Patients with post-traumatic stress disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder current in the past 6 months.
  • Patients with a history of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence within the last six months.
  • Patients with significant unstable medical illness.
  • Ongoing psychotherapy directed toward the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.
  • History of hypersensitivity to paroxetine CR, paroxetine or quetiapine.
  • History of cataracts.
  • Concurrent use of psychotropic medications including buspirone and antidepressants. Patients must have discontinued buspirone or antidepressant therapy at least two weeks prior to study entry, and fluoxetine at least four weeks prior, but no patient will be taken off effective medication.
  • Concomitant use of herbs and dietary supplements with known psychotropic properties, including St John's Wort, Kava, Valerian, Gingko, Ginseng, ephedra and weight loss supplements. Other than such agents with known psychotropic properties, no over the counter medications are exclusionary.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Paroxetine CR and Placebo
Eleven individuals were randomized to plaecbo augmentation of continued paroxetine CR at the week 10 dose level. In the first phase of the study, individuals started at 12.5 mg/day of paroxetine and flexibly titrated up to a maximum of 62.5 mg/day by week 10. Individuals who did not achieve remission and were randomized into the placebo group received placebo augmentation of continued paroxetine CR at the week 10 dose level.
Experimental: Quetiapine and continued paroxetine CR
Eleven individuals were randomized to quetiapine augmentation of continued paroxetine CR at the week 10 dose level. In the first phase of the study, individuals started at 12.5 mg/day of paroxetine and flexibly tirated up to a maximum of 62.5 mg/day by week 10. Individuals who did not receive remission and were randomized to receive quetiapine started at 25 mg at bedtime for the first week, then flexibly dosed based on response and tolerability to a maximum of 200 mg BID by week 16.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Score at Study Endpoint.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 18

Symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder as measured by the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) at week 18/study endpoint. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe) with a total score range of 0-56. Changes in HAM-A scores are calculated as the difference between the baseline HAM-A scores and scores at week 18/study endpoint.

The 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) (Hamilton, 1959) was developed to assess anxiety in a clinical population. It is considered a measure of general anxiety across anxiety disorders, in addition to being a gold standard measure for GAD.

Baseline and Week 18

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remission (HAM-A ≤ 7)
Time Frame: Week 18 (Study Endpoint)
Remission was measured as a secondary outcome using a score of less than or equal to 7 on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A).
Week 18 (Study Endpoint)
Response, Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Week 18 (Phase 2 Endpoint)
Response was measured as a secondary outcome using the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I). Response was defined as a score of 1 ["very much improved"] or 2 ["much improved"] at study endpoint.
Week 18 (Phase 2 Endpoint)
Depressive Symptoms, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Week 10 (Phase 1 Endpoint) and Week 18 (Phase 2 Endpoint)
Depressive symptoms were measured at a secondary outcome using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Each item is scored on a scale of 1-6; The total score range is 0-60, with higher scores indicated higher levels of depression severity.
Week 10 (Phase 1 Endpoint) and Week 18 (Phase 2 Endpoint)
The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q).
Time Frame: Week 10 (Phase 1 Endpoint) and Week 18 (Phase 2 Endpoint)
The 16-item Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) is used to assess quality of life changes with treatment. Total scores range from 14-70, with higher levels of satisfaction yielding higher scores.
Week 10 (Phase 1 Endpoint) and Week 18 (Phase 2 Endpoint)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Naomi M Simon, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Kathryn Connors, MD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety Disorder

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe