Phase II Study of RT-PEPC in Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Phase II Trial of Anti-Angiogenic Therapy With RT-PEPC in Patients With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Primary Objective:

Evaluate the clinical activity of the RT-PEPC combination regimen (rituximab, thalidomide, and prednisone, etoposide, procarbazine, cyclophosphamide) in patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma. Specifically, response rate (RR) and time to disease progression (TTP) will be assessed.

Secondary Objectives:

  1. Assess the toxicity profiles of RT-PEPC treatment in patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma.
  2. Prospectively characterize the angiogenic profile of patients with mantle cell lymphoma during treatment with RT-PEPC. The dynamics of the angiogenic profile will be correlated with clinical response to RT-PEPC therapy.
  3. Assess the quality of life of patients receiving RT-PEPC treatment

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of mantle cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma with characteristic immunophenotypic profiles: CD5(+),CD23(-), CD19(+) or CD20(+), cyclin D1(+), and CD10(-)
  • Patient has persistent / recurrent disease after standard chemotherapy
  • Patient has not received either standard or investigational drugs within the last 3 weeks
  • Available frozen tumor tissue obtained since completion of last prior therapy (rebiopsy if needed)
  • Patient has measurable disease as defined by a tumor mass > 1.5 cm in one dimension
  • Age > 18 years
  • Absolute granulocyte count > 1000 cells/mm3
  • Platelet count > 50,000 cells/mm3
  • Creatinine < 2.0 x ULN
  • Total bilirubin < 2.0 x ULN
  • Patient has KPS > 50%
  • Patient agrees to use birth control if of reproductive potential

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known central nervous system (CNS) involvement by lymphoma
  • Known HIV disease
  • Known peripheral neuropathy > grade 2
  • Patient is pregnant or nursing
  • Patient has had major surgery within the last 3 weeks
  • Patient is receiving other investigational drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study Treatment Arm

Induction phase (month 1-3)

• PEPC daily (prednisone 20 mg/day, cyclophosphamide 50 mg/day, etoposide 50 mg/day, and procarbazine 50 mg/day) until expected drop in neutrophil count (ANC < 3000), unless due to disease. After ANC returns to above 2,000/ul, PEPC resumes at alternate day or fractionated weekly basis.

Maintenance phase (month 4-12) • PEPC QOD or fractionated weekly basis.

Post-Month 12 Maintenance phase (post-month 12 until disease progression)

• PEPC QOD or fractionated weekly basis

Other Names:
  • Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, Procarbazine

Induction phase (month 1-3)

• Daily thalidomide at 50 mg/day for the first 8 weeks, then dose escalated as tolerated to a maximum of 100 mg/day.

Maintenance phase (month 4-12) • Daily low dose thalidomide (50-100 mg/d)

Post-Month 12 Maintenance phase (post-month 12 until disease progression)

• Daily low dose thalidomide (50-100mg/d)

Induction phase (month 1-3)

• Rituximab weekly x 4 (375 mg/m2/week) starting at week 1.

Maintenance phase (month 4-12) • Rituximab (375 mg/m2/week) weekly x 4 administered every 4 months.

Post-Month 12 Maintenance phase (post-month 12 until disease progression)

• Rituximab (375 mg/m2/week) weekly x 4 administered every 4 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: 38 months
measured by overall Response Rate (ORR), which includes Complete response and partial response.
38 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asses the Toxicity Profiles
Time Frame: 38 months
Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0.
38 months
Dynamic Levels of Plasma VEGF
Time Frame: 38 months
Stromal angiogenesis was assessed using blood vascular and perivascular markers, including VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, CD34, and a-SMA, as well as lymphatic vascular markers ofVEGFR-3, podoplanin, and Lyve-1.
38 months
The Quality of Life (QoL) of Patients Receiving RT-PEPC Treatment
Time Frame: baseline, every 2 months until Month 6, and every 6 months until disease progression

QoL assessments were obtained with version 3 of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) instrument. The FACT-G is comprised of four subscales: physical well-being (7-items, score range 0-28), social/family well-being (7-items, score range 0-28), emotional well-being (6-items, score range 0-24), and functional well-being (7-items, score range 0-28). Users of the FACT-G are able to generate an overall score and four subscale scores with ranges and distributions that are sample-specific. All questions in the FACT-G use a 5-point rating scale (0 = Not at all to 4 = Very much) A higher number indicates a better Quality of Life, and has a possible range of 0-108 points.

ANOVA was used to compare the difference in the means of total score among the different time points (baseline, every 2M until 6M, and every 6M until PD). The mean of the total FACT-G scores at baseline and mean of total score at all timepoints (using ANOVA) are reported below.

baseline, every 2 months until Month 6, and every 6 months until disease progression

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 7, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on PEPC

3
Subscribe