Controlled Trial to Increase Detection and Treatment of Osteoporosis in Older Patients With a Wrist Fracture

September 10, 2005 updated by: University of Alberta

The primary objective of this proposed research is to improve the quality of care for patients who present to the Emergency Department with osteoporosis and a fracture of the wrist, by increasing the use of proven efficacious osteoporosis treatment. This is the primary study outcome, and it is defined as starting any one of hormone therapy, a bisphosphonate, raloxifene, or calcitonin within 6 months of a fracture of the wrist.

The study hypothesis is that a quality improvement intervention (with multiple components that include a notification system for primary care physicians, patient-specific reminders, locally generated treatment guidelines endorsed by opinion leaders, and patient education and counseling) will lead to increased use of proven efficacious osteoporosis treatments in patients eligible for secondary prevention. This hypothesis will be tested by comparing the intervention with usual care controls, in a prospective nonrandomized controlled trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a progressive condition that causes a loss of bone mass, skeletal fragility, and fractures. Fractures result in pain, disability, deformity, and death. Osteoporosis is a major population health problem affecting 1.4 million Canadians, 25% of women and 12% of men over the age of 50 years. Current guidelines recommend aggressive secondary prevention in patients with osteoporosis who have suffered a fracture, because these patients have as high as a 20% risk of fracture in the following year, and because there are now proven efficacious treatments that can reduce this risk by 40-60%. Nevertheless, recent studies have shown that these patients are under-recognized and under-treated, demonstrating a care gap between evidence-based best practice and usual care. All patients with osteoporotic fractures (i.e., of the hip, vertebrae, or wrist) benefit from treatment. However, patients who present with a wrist fracture may be best suited to an intervention to improve secondary prevention practices, because wrist fractures are "sentinel events" in the natural history of osteoporosis: they are common, easily diagnosed, always present to medical attention, and occur years before the more devastating and costly fractures of the hip and vertebrae.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study is to improve the quality of care for patients who present to the ED with osteoporosis and a fracture of the wrist, by increasing the use of proven efficacious osteoporosis treatment. This is the primary study outcome, and it is defined as starting any one of hormone replacement therapy, a bisphosphonate, raloxifene, or calcitonin within 6 months of a fracture of the wrist.

HYPOTHESIS: A quality improvement intervention directed at patients and their primary care physicians will increase the use of proven efficacious osteoporosis treatment. The intervention itself has multiple components that include: a notification system and patient-specific reminders for primary care physicians, locally developed treatment guidelines endorsed by opinion leaders, and patient education and counseling. The study hypothesis will be tested by comparing the intervention to usual care controls, in a prospective nonrandomized controlled trial.

SPECIFIC AIMS: To determine whether the proposed intervention can-

  • 1. Increase the use of proven efficacious osteoporosis treatment in patients with a fracture of the wrist,
  • 2. Increase appropriate use of bone mineral density testing,
  • 3. Increase patients' knowledge of osteoporosis and satisfaction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
        • University Of Alberta Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 50 years
  • any closed distal forearm fracture
  • discharged home

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unwilling or unable to provide consent
  • admitted to hospital
  • long term care resident
  • residence outside Edmonton, Alberta
  • unable to read and converse in English
  • currently taking prescription osteoporosis treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Increased use of proven efficacious osteoporosis treatment within six months of study enrollment, defined as: hormone therapy, a bisphosphonate, raloxifene, or calcitonin.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
1. BMD testing
2. Osteoporosis diagnosis
3. Osteoporosis related knowledge
4. Satisfaction
5. Generic, Disease Specific, and Function-related QOL
6. Falls, falls-related injuries, and fall interventions
7. Persistence of effects and generalizability of effects
8. 1, 2, 3 year outcomes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sumit R Majumdar, MD, MPH, University of Alberta

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2001

Study Completion

January 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2005

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2005

Last Verified

September 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Multifaceted intervention (patient education, physician guidelines, reminders)

3
Subscribe