FREE Study - Fracture Reduction Evaluation

December 6, 2017 updated by: Medtronic Spine LLC

An International Multicentric, Multidisciplinary Prospective and Randomized Study to Compare Minimally Invasive Reduction and Fixation Using the KyphX System and Radiopaque PMMA Cement to Medical Therapy Alone for the Treatment of Painful, Acute Osteopenic Vertebral Body Compression Fractures

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard medical therapy alone to kyphoplasty using the KyphX system for the treatment of acute vertebral body compression fractures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

300

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Minimum of one painful, acute (edema present on MRI obtained within a two weeks period prior to enrolment) thoracic or lumbar (T5-L5) vertebral body compression fracture, due to osteopenia arising from primary or secondary osteoporosis, multiple myeloma, or osteolytic metastatic tumors and maximum of three painful fractures requiring treatment. (NOTE: a T2-weighted MRI should be done unless it is not available);
  • Minimum of one acute fracture to be treated that has height loss > 15% of predicted height (average height of two adjacent "normal" vertebrae) when measured at the middle of the vertebral endplate. (NOTE: If the adjacent vertebrae are not normal, the predicted height will be based on the height listed for the fractured vertebra in the table taken from Black et al.)
  • Pre-treatment VAS score > 4 on a scale of 10 where 0 is no pain, 5 is moderate pain and 10 is pain "as bad as you can imagine";
  • Patient 21 years of age or older;
  • The investigator and surgeon/radiologist agree before randomization that the fracture(s) can technically be reduced using an inflatable bone tamp (IBT); and
  • A signed Informed Consent is obtained from the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous vertebroplasty;
  • Vertebral body fracture morphology prevents use of devices (such as endplate below pedicles);
  • Pedicle fractures;
  • Acute fracture(s) to be treated symptomatic > 3 months at enrollment;
  • Pre-existing (not the result of the index fracture) neurological deficit or radicular pain that is not well defined or unstable;
  • Spinal cord compression or canal compromise requiring decompression;
  • Disabling back pain secondary to causes other than acute fracture;
  • Vertebral fracture due to primary or osteoblastic tumors;
  • Patient is currently on anticoagulation therapy that can not be interrupted;
  • Pre-existing conditions contrary to the kyphoplasty procedure:

    • Systemic infection
    • Local fractured vertebral body infection
    • Temporarily non-reversible bleeding disorder
  • Known allergy to any of the drugs, bone void filler material or contrast medium used in the treatment of study subjects
  • Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent;
  • Inability to walk or stand prior to the vertebral body fracture (walking aids are allowed);
  • MRI contraindication (e.g. cerebral aneurysm clips, pacemaker, implanted biostimulators, cochlear implants, penile prosthesis);
  • Pregnancy
  • Participation in any other clinical trial within the last 30 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard medical therapy alone to kyphoplasty using the KyphX system for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures (VCFs).
Safety will be compared between the study groups throughout the study with focus on clinically meaningful events and subsequent VCFs including the "treated" vertebrae.
The primary study endpoint is the change in quality of life as measured by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) scale of the 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) as measured at the one-month follow-up visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The secondary study endpoints are: EuroQol self-report (EQ-5D) questionnaire and SF-36 scores at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
procedural safety (peri-operative clinical events)
function as measured by objective functionality tests-reaching, "get up and go" and by the subjective Roland Morris disability questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
pain using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) at 5-10 days (post enrollment for the control group and post kyphoplasty for the kyphoplasty group)
changes in spinal deformity as measured radiographically at baseline, 3, 12 and 24 months.
Maintenance of vertebral body height will be assessed from lateral spine x-rays obtained in Kyphoplasty treated subjects only at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 month visits.
patient satisfaction at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
outcome (nursing home, back to status prior to fracture) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
economic aspects (including hospital days, disabilities, etc.) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
the cost-effectiveness of kyphoplasty expressed in incremental cost/quality adjusted life year gained at different time points (1 year and 2 years)
rate of incident fractures at 3, 12 and 24 months (frequency, timing and location)
Each endpoint will be compared between the 2 groups and for its evolution over time.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Prof. Johnell, MD, UMRA - Malmo, Sweden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Balloon Kyphoplasty

3
Subscribe