Adenoma Detection Rate With Position Change at Colonoscopy

April 1, 2009 updated by: London North West Healthcare NHS Trust

Evaluation of the Effect of Position Change During the Withdrawal Phase of Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rate

The hypothesis to be tested is that position changes during the withdrawal phase of colonoscopy leads to a higher adenoma (polyp) detection rate because of better distension of the colon. Since adenomas are precancerous lesions the enhanced adenoma detection will increase the success of colorectal cancer screening programmes. This study will provide evidence for the value of position changes and encourage endoscopist to adopt position change as a routine in their practice.

May 2007: protocol amendment to include additional prospective analysis using High Definition TV (HDTV).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cause of cancer death. In a majority of cases it is preceded by a precancerous lesion called an adenoma (commonly known as polyp). Detection and removal of adenomas at colonoscopy has been shown to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer. The success of the impending colorectal cancer screening programme to reduce cancer mortality in an average-risk population depends on optimal adenoma detection at colonoscopy. The detection of adenomas has been shown to vary between different endoscopist. Some of the factors that have been reported to affect adenoma detection rates included the time spent viewing, the adequacy of the bowel preparation and the time spent cleaning the colonic mucosa of excess fluid. Careful examination of proximal side of flexures, folds and valves by the endoscopist is equally important. However, even with careful examination adenoma detection rates have been shown to vary between endoscopist from 8.6% to 15.9%. Previous experience and training may be contributed to this difference. Some endoscopist adopt regular changes in position during the procedure to maximize distension of the colon. Better luminal distension enhances mucosal views for detection of the smaller adenomas. The validity of this approach has never been tested and we propose that this factor may contribute to the differences in adenoma detection rates.

Patients will be randomised to either position 1 first then position 2 or vice versa and examined twice. During one withdrawal the colon will be examined with the participant in the left lateral position only (position 1) or with position changes (position 2)or vice versa.

May 2007: protocol amendment to include additional prospective analysis using High Definition TV (HDTV). No further patient data collection involved.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Middlesex
      • London, Middlesex, United Kingdom, HA1 3UJ
        • North West London NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients referred ot colonoscopy, age between 50 - 70 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with colorectal cancer, previous colonic surgery, active colitis and musculoskeletal problems Patients may also be excluded after the first insertion, if painful, routine care will proceed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
adenoma detection rate for position 1 compared to position 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
percentage of adenomas detected in all the participants for each position

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian Saunders, MD, St Mark's Hospital, North West London NHS Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 2, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2009

Last Verified

December 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 05/CO05/15

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polyps

Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy

3
Subscribe