Study In Patients With Depression Not Responding to Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors

November 19, 2019 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

Clinical Evaluation of 323U66 SR in Patients With Depression - Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Comparative Study in Patients With Depression Who Did Not Respond Sufficiently to Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety in depressive patients who did not respond sufficiently to selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

325

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aichi, Japan, 462-0831
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Aichi, Japan, 470-1141
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Aichi, Japan, 475-0074
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Chiba, Japan, 270-1613
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 810-0001
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 816-0864
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 802-0006
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 814-0180
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 816-0801
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukushima, Japan, 960-0102
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukushima, Japan, 961-0021
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukushima, Japan, 963-0207
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 002-8029
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 004-0052
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 004-0841
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 047-0155
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 060-0042
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 060-0061
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 062-0922
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 063-0061
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 063-0804
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 080-0014
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hyogo, Japan, 651-0092
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hyogo, Japan, 651-0097
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hyogo, Japan, 653-0841
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hyogo, Japan, 657-0846
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Ibaraki, Japan, 311-3193
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Ibaraki, Japan, 300-0812
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Ishikawa, Japan, 920-0939
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kagawa, Japan, 761-0793
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kanagawa, Japan, 231-0023
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kanagawa, Japan, 238-0042
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kanagawa, Japan, 213-0001
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kanagawa, Japan, 223-0052
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kanagawa, Japan, 225-0011
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kumamoto, Japan, 861-8002
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Nagano, Japan, 390-8510
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Nara, Japan, 639-0225
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Okayama, Japan, 700-0941
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Osaka, Japan, 530-0026
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Osaka, Japan, 571-0048
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Osaka, Japan, 576-0054
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Osaka, Japan, 582-0025
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Osaka, Japan, 589-0011
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Osaka, Japan, 590-0018
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 170-0005
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 107-0052
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 108-0072
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 110-0005
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 114-0014
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 120-0033
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 141-0032
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 152-0012
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 154-0003
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 154-0004
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 160-0023
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 170-0002
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 178-0063
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 194-0022
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 204-0022
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tottori, Japan, 682-0023
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tottori, Japan, 683-8504
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • [At the start of the pretreatment phase]
  • Target disease: Patients diagnosed as having the following primary disease on the basis of DSM-IV-TR criteria.
  • Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode (296.2x) (excluding with psychotic features)
  • Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent (296.3x) (excluding with psychotic features)
  • HAM-D (17 items) total score is >=16.
  • Patients who have been treated with marketed paroxetine (Paxil®) at 20mg/day to 40mg/day for 4 weeks and more at the start of the pretreatment phase.
  • Age: >=18 years old (at the time of informed consent) , <65 years old (at the start of treatment phase )
  • Gender: Male or female.
  • Inpatients or outpatients: Either
  • Informed consent: The subject himself/herself must give written informed consent. However, if the subject is under 20 at the time of giving consent, both the subject himself/herself and his/her legally acceptable representative must give written informed consent.

[At the end of the pretreatment phase]

  1. HAM-D (17 items) total score is ≥14.
  2. Percentage of change from the start of the pretreatment phase in the HAM-D (17 items) total score is <50%

[At the start of the treatment phase]

  1. HAM-D (17 items) total score is ≥14.
  2. Percentage of change from the start of the pretreatment phase in the HAM-D (17 items) total score is <50%

Exclusion Criteria:

[At the start of the pre-treatment phase]

  • Patients with a complication of glaucoma
  • Patients concomitantly using a drug increasing the risk of bleeding and patients with bleeding tendency or predisposition to bleeding
  • Patients with predisposition to seizure (who currently have or have a past history of seizure, febrile convulsive seizure in infancy, cerebral tumour, cerebrovascular disorder or head injury, who have a family history of idiopathic seizure, patients with diabetes who have been treated with oral hypoglycaemics or insulin, or who use drugs lowering the threshold of seizure).
  • Patients who currently have or have a past history of the following disorders:
  • Anorexia nervosa (DSM-IV-TR 307.1)
  • Bulimia nervosa (DSM-IV-TR 307.51)
  • Patients with a history of manic episode
  • Patients with a past or current DSM- IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder
  • Patients with a current DSM-IV-TR Axis II diagnosis (e.g., antisocial or borderline personality disorder)
  • Patients starting psychotherapy (except for supportive psychotherapy not aimed at therapeutic efficacy and unlikely to affect efficacy evaluation) and formal cognitive behaviour therapy within 5 weeks prior to the start of the pre-treatment phase
  • Patients with a diagnosis of substance abuse (alcohol or drug) by the DSM-IV-TR criteria or with a diagnosis of substance dependence within 1 year prior to the start of the pre-treatment phase
  • Patients who have received electroconvulsive therapy within 17 weeks prior to the start of the pre-treatment phase
  • Patients who have taken MAO inhibitors (selegiline hydrochloride) within 2 weeks prior to the start of the pre-treatment phase
  • Patients who have taken another investigational drug within 12 weeks prior to the start of the pre-treatment phase
  • Female patients who are pregnant, possibly pregnant or are nursing, and those who want to become pregnant before 30 days after the last dose of the investigational product
  • Patients who have attempted suicide within 17 weeks prior to the start of the pre-treatment phase, or patients for whom the score of suicide-related item No. 3 of HAM-D is >=3, or patients in whom the risk of suicide is judged to be high by the investigator (sub-investigator)
  • Patients in whom the risk of homicide is judged to be high by the investigator (sub-investigator)
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to 323U66 and/or paroxetine
  • Patients with serious cerebral disease
  • Patients who have ECG or clinical evidence of any cardiac condition that the investigator (sub-investigator) feels may predispose the subject to ischemia or arrhythmia
  • Patients with serious physical symptoms (i.e. cardiac/hepatic/renal disorder, hematopoietic disorder) The index of seriousness is Grade 3 of "Criteria for classification of seriousness of adverse drug reactions to pharmaceutical products, etc." (PAB/PSD No.80 in 1992).
  • Patients with a history or complication of cancer or malignant tumour.
  • Patients whose major depressive disorder is due to direct physiological effects of a general medical condition (for example, hypothyroidism, Parkinson's disease, chronic pain)
  • Patients with systolic blood pressure of >=160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of >=100 mmHg
  • Patients who are inappropriate for participating in the study in the judgement of the investigator (sub-investigator)

[At the start of the treatment phase]

  1. Patients whose compliance of paroxetine during the pretreatment phase is less than 70%.
  2. Patients who have ECG or clinical evidence of any cardiac condition that the investigator (sub-investigator) feels may predispose the subject to ischemia or arrhythmia
  3. Patients with systolic blood pressure of >=160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of >=100 mmHg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder who were randomised to placebo to match Bupropion SR during the treatment period.
Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder who were randomised to placebo to match Bupropion SR during the treatment period.
Experimental: Bupropion SR
Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder who were randomized to take 100mg of Bupropion SR in the morning and placebo in the evening for one week. Week 2 subjects were given 100mg dose of Bupropion morning and evening. Weeks 3 thru 12 received 150mg dose morning and evening. Week 1=dose level 1, 100 mg. Week 2=dose level 2, 200 mg. Weeks 3 - 12=dose level 3, 300 mg.
Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder who were randomized to take 100mg of Bupropion SR in the morning and placebo in the evening for one week. Week 2 subjects were given 100mg dose of Bupropion morning and evening. Weeks 3 thru 12 received 150mg dose morning and evening. Week 1=dose level 1, 100 mg. Week 2=dose level 2, 200 mg. Weeks 3 - 12=dose level 3, 300 mg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D 17 Items) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression contains 17 questions which detect change and measure illness severity. Individual items are rated on a scale of 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2 with total HAM-D score range from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill).
Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D 17 Items) Total Score
Time Frame: Week 8 and Week 12
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression contains 17 questions which detect change and measure illness severity. Individual items are rated on a scale of 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2 with total HAM-D score range from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill).
Week 8 and Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D 17 Items) Total Score at Week 8 and Total Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression contains 17 questions which detect change and measure illness severity. Individual items are rated on a scale of 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2 with total HAM-D score range from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill).
Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
Percentage of Change From Baseline of the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D 17 Items) Total Score at Weeks 8 and 12.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression contains 17 questions which detect change and measure illness severity. Individual items are rated on a scale of 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2 with total HAM-D score range from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill).
Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
Percentage of Responders Based on Hamilton Depression (HAM-D 17 Items) Scale Total Score at Weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression contains 17 questions which detect change and measure illness severity. Individual items are rated on a scale of 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2 with total HAM-D score range from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill). Responders are defined as subjects with 50% or greater reduction from baseline in HAM-D total score.
Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
Percentage of Remitters Based on Hamilton Depression (HAM-D 17 Items) Scale Total Score at Weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression contains 17 questions which detect change and measure illness severity. Individual items are rated on a scale of 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2 with total HAM-D score range from 0 (not ill) to 52 (severely ill). Remitters are defined as subjects with HAM-D total score ≤ 7.
Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Each Item of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D 17 Items) Score at Weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression contains 17 questions which detect change and measure illness severity. Individual items are rated on a scale of 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2, with total HAM-D scores ranging from 0 (not ill) to 54 (severely ill).
Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
Percentage of Change From Baseline in Each Item of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D 17 Items) Score at Weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression contains 17 questions which detect change and measure illness severity. Individual items are rated on a scale of 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2, with total HAM-D scores ranging from 0 (not ill) to 54 (severely ill).
Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12
The 7-point Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) measures the severity of psychiatric symptoms. The following scores can be given: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill patients.
Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Responders Based on the Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
The CGI-I assesses the investigator's impression of the patient's current illness. The time span is the week before the rating and the score ranges from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Responders are subjects that have a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the CGI-I.
Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12
Study Continuation Rate as Assessed by the Number of Participants at Risk at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated using event or censoring and time to event or censoring. Participants at risk refers to participants with either a censoring or event time beyond the time point of interest (Week 12).
Week 12
Safety: Adverse Events by Organ System Class, Intensity, and Frequency
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Assessment of intensity was based on investigators/subinvestigator's clinical judgement per protocol instructions: Mild event, easily tolerated, with minimal discomfort and not interfering with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs); moderate event, with discomfort that interferes with ADLs; severe event, prevents ADLs.
Baseline to Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 19, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 28, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 28, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (click on the link provided below)

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe