- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00424619
A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Low Vitamin D levels can cause faster bone loss and increase the risk of having a fracture. Patients who experience a hip fracture have low levels of Vitamin D. It is not clear how much Vitamin D must be taken in order to reach this optimal level.
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD) concentrations are the recognized functional status indicator for vitamin D. Although there is no clear consensus, vitamin D 'insufficiency' has been considered in the range of 25- 75/80 nmol/L. Patients with acute hip fracture are at high risk for a recurrent hip fracture or other fragility fractures (and falls) and are a group who should be targeted for osteoporosis treatment (i.e. Bisphosphonate or other antiresorptive). Before fracture patients start on a bisphosphonate, however, an important consideration is whether 25-OHD levels are at a therapeutic level (>75 nmol/l and less than 150-200 nmol/L). Case-control studies indicate that older people who experience a hip fracture have lower serum concentrations of 25-OHD than do those without a fracture. In cross-sectional studies, the majority of patients with hip fracture are considered to have insufficient vitamin D levels. Although the benefits of supplementing patients with at least 800 to 1000 IU/day Vitamin D3 may be recognized, there is little information available to guide physicians regarding the appropriate management of hip fracture patients who may be severely Vitamin D deficient, particularly in acute hip fracture patients. Few studies have examined whether high dose vitamin D (i.e. 50,000 IU or greater/week) offers an advantage over smaller, routinely prescribed doses (i.e. 800 or 1000 IU), particularly in hip fracture patients.
The purpose of this study is to determine the number of hip fracture patients reaching an optimal level of vitamin D comparing between three different Vitamin D dose strategies:
A. 50,000 D2 oral bolus followed by 800 IU D3 daily B. 100,000 D2 oral bolus followed by 800 IU D3 daily C. 800 IU D3 daily
The Vitamin D strategies will be administered over 3-months in acute hip fracture patients. The proportion of patients reaching an optimal level of 25-OHD (>75 nmol/L) will be determined.
Secondary measures include the Timed Up and Go test, and 2 Minute Walk Test to compare the effects of the Vitamin D supplementation strategies on functional and muscle strength scales.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fragility hip fracture patient
- Previous Vitamin D supplementation is okay.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with pathological fracture secondary to malignancy or intrinsic bone disease (eg. Paget's disease)
- Cancer in the past 10 years likely to metastasize to bone
- Renal insufficiency (creatinine <30 mls/min)
- Hypercalcemia (primary hyperparathyroidism; granulomatous diseases; drug-induced such as lithium, thiazides), hypocalcemia, hypercalciuria, fracture or stroke within the last 3 months
- Hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, or bisphosphonates during the previous 24 months
- Pre-existing bone abnormality
- Renal stones in past 10 years
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: 3
Placebo
|
Placebo, 1 time bolus dose
|
Active Comparator: 1
50 000 IU Vitamin D2
|
50 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
Other Names:
100 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: 2
100 000 IU Vitamin D2
|
50 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
Other Names:
100 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
|
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD) was measured at baseline, at discharge from hospital (approximately 4-weeks), and at a follow-up study visit at approximately 3-months.Baseline and 4-week blood samples were drawn in-hospital; venipunctures performed at 3-months were either in-hospital (if patient remained in acute care or rehabilitation) or at the out-patient clinic visit.Serum 25-OHD was analyzed with the DiaSorin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D radioimmunoassay (Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0285, U.S.A) at the central laboratory with the exception of 3 patients (data analyzed at other laboratories).
|
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
|
Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital.
In additional PTH was accessed at baseline.
|
Baseline
|
Calcium
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
|
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital.
In additional Calcium was accessed at baseline and approximately 4 weeks.
|
Baseline, 4 weeks
|
Phosphate
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital.
In additional phosphate was accessed at baseline.
|
Baseline
|
Alkaline Phosphatase
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital.
In additional Alkaline Phosphatase was accessed at baseline.
|
Baseline
|
Hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital.
In additional hemoglobin was accessed at baseline.
|
Baseline
|
Creatinine
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital.
In additional creatinine was accessed at baseline.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Functional Assessment Using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test After 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended the rehabilitation unit this is routinely collected and was abstracted from chart.
The TUG was conducted using a standard armchair and a line marked 3-metres from the chair.
Participants were given the following instructions (no physical assistance was given): "Rise from the chair, walk to the line on the floor, turn, return to the chair and sit down again".
Scores are measured as time in seconds to complete the task.
|
3 months
|
Functional Assessment Using the Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT)After 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The 2MWT was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended rehabilitation, it was abstracted from their charts.
The 2MWT test was given in a carpeted corridor and the subject was instructed to wear regular footwear and to use their customary walking aid.
The distance the participant could comfortably walk in two-minutes (without physical assistance) was measured in metres.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alexandra Papaioannou, M.D., M.Sc., McMaster University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 06-449
- P1975
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hip Fracture
-
University Health Network, TorontoNot yet recruitingSurgery | Hip-fracture
-
Lund UniversityMalmo Municipality, SwedenRecruiting
-
Hvidovre University HospitalCompleted
-
Michal Roll PhD,MBATel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterUnknown
-
The University of Hong KongRecruiting
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedPertrochanteric Hip FractureUnited States
-
Eurofarma Laboratorios S.A.TerminatedHip Fracture SurgeryBrazil
-
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal...Completed
-
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing DocumentationCompletedHip Fractures | Closed Fracture of HipIsrael, Austria, Switzerland, Germany, Belgium, Norway
Clinical Trials on Vitamin D2
-
Baltimore VA Medical CenterNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Nutrition Obesity Research Center (NORC)TerminatedMetabolic Syndrome | Vitamin D DeficiencyUnited States
-
University of HelsinkiUniversity College Cork; Technical University of DenmarkCompletedSerum 25-hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations (25OHD)Finland
-
USDA, Western Human Nutrition Research CenterCompletedVitamin D DeficiencyUnited States
-
Boston UniversityCompleted
-
Peking University People's HospitalUnknownVitamin D Deficiency | Chronic Kidney DiseaseChina
-
Atlanta VA Medical CenterEmory UniversityCompleted
-
Boston UniversityCompleted
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCompletedMetabolic Syndrome | Vitamin D Deficiency | PrediabetesUnited States
-
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityRecruitingVitamin D Deficiency | Chronic Kidney Disease 5D | Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Due to Renal CausesChina
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterActive, not recruiting