Safety and Efficacy Study of of Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Estramustine in Hormone Refractory Prostatic Cancer

Randomized Phase Ii Trial Of Weekly Docetaxel, Estramustine And Prednisone Versus Docetaxel And Prednisone In Patient With Hormone-Resistant Prostate Cancer

we propose to randomize patients with hormone resistant prostate cancer between docetaxel/estramustine/prednisone and docetaxel/prednisone in a phase II study. The principal endpoint will be the efficacy in term of PSA response.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The addition of estramustine to other chemotherapeutic agents that affect microtubule function may improve their efficacy15, 16, 17, 18. A phase III trial compared vinblastine versus the combination of vinblastine plus estramustine as treatment for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. They showed that the association of estramustine and vinblastine was superior to vinblastine alone for time to progression, PSA response and survival (Hudes et al., ASCO 2002). In addition, Berry et al. found that estramustine/paclitaxel improved PSA response rate but not overall survival compared with paclitaxel alone (Berry et al. ASCO2001).

Similar association has been studied with docetaxel. In a phase I trial combining docetaxel and estramustine19, 53% of patients reported a decrease in narcotic use and 63% experienced a PSA response. In another phase I trial, a reduction in PSA of 50% or more was observed in 14 of 17 patients (82%)20. In a phase II trial involving 35 patients, a PSA response was reported in 74% of the patients and objective response in 4 out of 7 patients with measurable disease21. Median survival 22 months in this last study. These studies as well as other support the combination of estramustine and docetaxel in the treatment of HRPC22, 23.

Recently, Oudard et al. competed a phase II randomized study comparing mitoxantrone/prednisone versus docetaxel/estramustine prednisone24. Docetaxel was given either weekly or every 3 weeks. Association of docetaxel/estramustine was found superior to mitoxantrone in term of PSA response, (67-63% versus 18%), clinical benefit (79-56% versus 41%) and survival (19.2 months versus 11.6 months). In addition, toxicities of these regimens were manageable and predictable. In this study, patients received 2 mgr of coumadin to prevent thromboembolic event due to estramustine and only 7 % of the patients had thrombosis. Other grade III & IV toxicities of the estramustine/docetaxel combination included neutropenia (37% in the 3-week regimen and 0 % in the weekly regimen) nausea/vomiting (2% in the 3-week regimen and 0 % in the weekly regimen), diarrhea (7% in the 3-week regimen and 0 % in the weekly regimen). No febrile neutropenia was observed.

Although these data support a role for chemotherapy combinations, such as estramustine and docetaxel, in the treatment of HRPC, further studies are needed to determine the relative contribution of estramustine to the efficacy of docetaxel/estramustine regimen. In this context, we propose to randomize patients with hormone resistant prostate cancer between docetaxel/estramustine/prednisone and docetaxel/prednisone in a phase II study. The principal endpoint will be the efficacy in term of PSA response. We chose to use the weekly regimen as described by Oudard since the toxicity of this regimen is well described and is easily manageable in our experience.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Baudour, Belgium, 7331
        • RHMS louis caty
      • Bouge, Belgium, 5004
        • Clinique Saint Luc
      • Boussu, Belgium, 7300
        • CHR Warquignies
      • Brasschaat, Belgium, 2930
        • AZ Klina
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1040
        • Parc Léopold
      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1050
        • Hôpitaux IRIS Sud
      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1200
        • Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
      • Eupen, Belgium, 4700
        • Sint Nilolaus
      • Gilly, Belgium, 6000
        • Clinique St Joseph
      • Gosselies, Belgium, 6041
        • Notre Dame de Grâce
      • La-Louvière, Belgium, 7100
        • CH Jolimont Lobbes
      • Liège, Belgium, 4000
        • St Joseph
      • Mons, Belgium, 7000
        • CHU Ambroise Paré
      • Namur, Belgium, 5000
        • Clinique Sainte Elisabeth
      • Tournai, Belgium, 7500
        • Notre Dame
      • Yvoir, Belgium, 5004
        • Clinique Universitaire de Mt Godinne
    • Brabant Wallon
      • Ottignies, Brabant Wallon, Belgium, 1340
        • St Pierre
    • Hainaut
      • Charleroi, Hainaut, Belgium, 6000
        • Notre Dame et Reine Fabiola
      • Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 1210
        • CHR Luxembourg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent prior to beginning protocol specific procedures.
  • 18 years
  • Histologically/cytologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma.
  • Documented metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma
  • Patients must have received prior hormonal therapy as defined below:
  • Castration by orchiectomy and/or LHRH agonists with or without
  • Antiandrogens
  • Other hormonal agents (e.g., ketoconazole, ...)
  • Testosterone level should be < 50 ng/dl in all patients (castrated level).
  • Respect of antiandrogen withdrawal period
  • No prior chemotherapy regimen at the exception of estramustine phosphate.
  • documented disease progression defined either (i) by PSA increase and/or (ii) imaging:
  • Prior radiation therapy (to less or equal than 25% of the bone marrow only) is allowed. At least 4 weeks must have elapsed since the completion of radiation therapy and the patient must have recovered from side effects.
  • Prior surgery is allowed. At least 4 weeks must have elapsed since the completion of surgery.
  • Life expectancy > 3 months.
  • ECOG performance status 0-2.
  • Normal cardiac function.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior chemotherapy except estramustine phosphate.(2)
  • Prior isotope therapy
  • Prior radiotherapy to >25% of bone marrow
  • Prior malignancy except the following: adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, or any other cancer from which the patient has been disease-free for >5 years.
  • Known brain or leptomeningeal involvement.
  • Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy > grade 2
  • Other serious illness or medical condition
  • Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs.
  • Treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy (except LHRH agonists)
  • Treatment with systemic corticosteroids used for reasons other than specified by the protocol must be stopped prior to the administration of docetaxel.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A
weekly docetaxel and prednisone
35mg/m² on day 2 and 9 (21days in a cycle)
Other Names:
  • Taxotere
140mg caps x3 bid from day 1to 5 and day 8 to 12 of each cycle
Other Names:
  • estramustine phosphate
2x5 mg a day
Other Names:
  • medrol
Active Comparator: B
weekly docetaxel (35mg/m&) plus prednisone 10mg a day associated with estramustine form day 1to 5 and 8 to 12
35mg/m² on day 2 and 9 (21days in a cycle)
Other Names:
  • Taxotere
2x5 mg a day
Other Names:
  • medrol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the efficacy of the association of Docetaxel and Estramustineand Prednisone versus Docetaxel and Prednisone in the treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer in terms o PSA response
Time Frame: within 30 days after end of treatment
within 30 days after end of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
PSA response Time to PSA progression PSA response duration Event Progression-Free Survival Overall survival Palliative response (Pain) Safety Objective response measurable disease (RECIST)
Time Frame: untill death occurs
untill death occurs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Pascal Machiels, MD PHD, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Kerger, MD, Clinqiue Universitaire de Mont Godinne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

October 10, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2009

Last Verified

October 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on docetaxel

3
Subscribe