Treatment of Oral Premalignant Lesions With 5-ALA PDT

March 4, 2015 updated by: University of Arkansas

A Combined Phase I/II Single Site Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Utilizing 5-aminolevulinic Acid (5-ALA) and PDT in the Treatment of Premalignant Oral and/or Oropharynx Lesions.

Oral leukoplakia within the mouth is a visible white patch which can develop into cancer if not treated. There is no good treatment for these lesions, apart from surgery which is associated with significant side effects and physical deformation of the treated area.

The investigators hypothesized that photodynamic therapy can be used safely and effectively to induce significant regression of oral leukoplakia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a combined Phase I/II non-randomized prospective study designed to determine the safety and assess the clinical efficacy of PDT in the treatment of oral leukeplekia with 5-ALA and 585-nm PDL with 1.5 ms pulse time. In the first part of the study we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the PDL radiant exposure in combination with 5-ALA. In the second phase of the study, this dose is used to treat subjects at the MTD in order to determine the efficacy of the treatment by documenting the regression of the treated lesions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least one grossly visible premalignant lesion (i.e. leukoplakia or erythroplakia) in the oral cavity or oropharynx, with a confirmed diagnosis of leukoplakia with or without dysplasia,measuring ≥ 10 mm in diameter.
  • Informed of alternative treatment methods including watchful waiting, laser ablation, or surgical resection.
  • Eligible for long-term follow-up for at least one year and be able to tolerate biopsies.
  • Subject has signed an informed consent.
  • Subject is between the ages of 18 - 80 years of age.
  • Male or Female
  • Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1 at screening. See Appendix A

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known sensitivity to porphyrins or photoactive medications - See Appendix B
  • Invasive carcinoma of the lesion as demonstrated by biopsy.
  • Subjects with inherited or acquired blood clotting defects
  • Women who are breast feeding, have a positive (+) urine pregnancy test, or refuse to use 2 effective means of contraception during drug exposure and up to 48 hours after.
  • Subjects with porphyria
  • Life expectancy less than 12 months
  • Inability or unwillingness of subject to give written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phase 1 light dose escalation

During Phase I, to determine the maximum tolerated energy density of the Pulse Dye Laser operated at 585 nm with a pulse time of 1.5 ms (PDL-585), when used in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) applied topically to the premalignant lesion.

The maximum tolerated energy density will be called the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). Procedure: Fluorescence Diagnosis Imaging Interventions: Application of 5-ALA to lesion followed by activation with high power 585 nm pulsed dye laser (PDL-585, ScleroPLUS laser) at 6, 7 and 8 J/cm2.

PDT Treatment; emits light with 585 nm wavelength in pulses of 1.5 milliseconds in sections of 5 mm diameter to target the lesion and surrounding tissue
Topically administered; incubation time 60-180 minutes; single dose (345 mg of active 5-ALA in 1.5 ml solution); soaked onto white gauze and applied to lesion, covered with sterile Xeroform gauze
Other Names:
  • 5-ALA
FD Image taken prior to PDL-585 usage
Experimental: Phase 2 - Treatment efficacy of PDT

Procedure: Fluorescence Diagnosis Imaging

Interventions: Application of 5-ALA to lesion followed by activation with high power 585 nm pulsed dye laser (PDL-585, ScleroPLUS laser) at 8 J/cm2.

PDT Treatment; emits light with 585 nm wavelength in pulses of 1.5 milliseconds in sections of 5 mm diameter to target the lesion and surrounding tissue
Topically administered; incubation time 60-180 minutes; single dose (345 mg of active 5-ALA in 1.5 ml solution); soaked onto white gauze and applied to lesion, covered with sterile Xeroform gauze
Other Names:
  • 5-ALA
FD Image taken prior to PDL-585 usage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Tolerated Dose
Time Frame: Day 2
The traditional 3+3 dose escalation design was employed. Three cohorts were enrolled at 3 subjects per cohort, and treated with escalating radiant exposures of 6, 7, or 8 J/cm2. In each cohort, the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Dose escalation rules were the same as those provided by Storer 1989.
Day 2
The Objective Response Rate is the Number of Participants With Significant Response (SR), Partial Response (PR) or No Response (NR).
Time Frame: Day 90
The response rate was quantified by examination by an experienced head and neck surgeon and classified as follows: significant response (SR) was one where the lesion had greater than 75% resolution, partial response (PR) was one in which the lesion was reduced in size by at least 25%, and no response (NR) was one where the lesion was reduced by less than 25% in size.
Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gal Shafirstein, PhD, University of Arkansas

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leukoplakia

Clinical Trials on PDL-585, ScleroPLUS laser

3
Subscribe