Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients (Aim 3)

December 14, 2015 updated by: Indiana University

Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients

We will directly test the hypothesis that an initial strategy of lisinopril-based therapy will be more effective than atenolol-based therapy in causing regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) over one year in patients with hemodialysis hypertension despite similar degree of BP reduction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a parallel group, active control, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of initial therapy with an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) vs. beta-blocker therapy (atenolol) each administered three times weekly after dialysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients on chronic hemodialysis for > 3 mos.
  2. Compliance with hemodialysis treatments as defined by less than one missed dialysis per month
  3. Hypertension as diagnosed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) >135/75 mm Hg after participation in the ultrafiltration (UF) Trial, or those on no antihypertensive medications but unwilling to do UF Trial.
  4. Presence of LVH on echocardiogram defined as left ventricular mass index (LVMi) >104 g/m2 in women and >116 g/m2 in men.
  5. Willingness to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Vascular event (stroke, myocardial infarction or limb ischemia requiring bypass) within previous six months
  2. Noncompliance with hemodialysis treatments
  3. Known drug abuse
  4. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) requiring home oxygen
  5. Congestive Heart Failure Class III or IV.
  6. Body mass index > 40 kg/m2.
  7. Known contraindication to atenolol (severe heart failure, bradycardia, bronchial asthma, intolerance or allergy) or lisinopril (cough, pregnancy, intolerance or allergy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Atenolol
Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg.
Experimental: 2
Lisinopril
Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
The primary outcome of the study was the average reduction in left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area from baseline to 1 year. A mixed model was used with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) as the outcome variable. Fixed effects were indicator variables for time, treatment and their interaction. Random effect was subject and statistical inference was made using the maximum likelihood estimator. No imputation was made for missing data.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial Termination
Time Frame: 1 yr
Cardiovascular events were counted by subject and included the following: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF), hospitalized angina, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization and heart valve replacement. Adverse events reported are those during the course of 12 months of participation in the trial. All serious adverse events were adjudicated by R.A. and A.D.S. who were masked to the drug assignment at the time of adjudication. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. The cardiovascular event rate was calculated by treatment group assignment. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). As a post hoc analysis, we also determined the narrower definition of cardiovascular events per group that included MI, stroke, CHF, or cardiovascular death.
1 yr

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rajiv Agarwal, MD, Indiana University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Atenolol

3
Subscribe