Vacuum Assisted Closure as a Treatment for Draining Hematomas (VAC-DH)

September 28, 2013 updated by: University of Alabama at Birmingham

Vacuum Assisted Closure as a Treatment For Draining Hematomas (Vacuum Assisted Closure in the Management of Traumatic Extremity Wounds)

This project is designed as a prospective, randomized, comparative study evaluating the use of a negative pressure vacuum device in treating draining hematomas following traumatic injury.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Application of the VAC device may significantly decrease the incidence of draining hematomas that require surgical irrigation and debridement. The aim of this project is to perform a prospective, randomized study evaluating the VAC negative pressure device as a treatment for draining hematomas. We will also analyze the cost of treating a hematoma with a VAC compared with currently employed treatments. Additionally, we will document the incidence of infection of the hematoma with and without use of the VAC device.

Patients who have a draining hematoma five days following surgery and who give informed consent to enter the study will be randomized into two groups. Group A will be patients treated with a pressure dressing and observation, which is the most common current method of treatment. Group B will be patients treated with a VAC negative pressure device. Patients will be carefully monitored for continued drainage by evaluating the wounds and dressings clinically. Patients in either group that are still draining at ten days following surgery will be taken to the operating room for irrigation and debridement. Patients in either group who develop infection will be immediately treated with irrigation and debridement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Orthopaedic Trauma

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who has had an orthopaedic surgical procedure following trauma and has a draining wound for at least five days
  • No clinical evidence of infection
  • Adult patient (19 years and older)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • An infected hematoma. Infection will be defined by clinical signs and symptoms of infection that include increasing drainage, increasing pain, purulent drainage, and increasing erythema. Any hematomas that are thought to be infected will be cultured to confirm the diagnosis
  • A surgical incision that can not be covered with VAC sponges and a water impermeable sheet (such Tegaderm) to achieve a closed vacuum environment over the wound
  • Wounds associated with the surgical incision that are intentionally left open to heal with either a delayed primary closure or secondary granulation
  • Abnormal coagulation leading to an expanding hematoma that will require surgical debridements
  • Prisoners
  • Pregnant Women
  • Inability to comply with protocol
  • Patients or family members who are unable or unwilling to sign study consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1, A
Group A patients will be treated with a pressure dressing and observation.
If hematoma still draining at 5 days post surgery, patients who randomize to Group A will have a standard pressure dressing applied and checked every 24-48 hours for continued draining. If still draining at 10 days post surgery, patient is at end point of study and must return to OR for Irrigation and Debridement of the wound. If infection occurs, patient is at end point of study and must return to OR for I&D.
Active Comparator: 2, B
Group B patients will be treated with a Vacuum Assisted Closure device (VAC).
If hematoma still draining at 5 days post surgery, patients who randomize to Group B will have a VAC negative pressure device applied and checked every 24-48 hours for continued draining. If still draining at 10 days post surgery, patient is at end point of study and must return to OR for Irrigation and Debridement of the wound. If infection occurs, patient is at end point of study and must return to OR for I&D.
Other Names:
  • Vacuum Assisted Closure device, Kinetics Concepts, Inc.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Dry and healed draining hematoma
Time Frame: If hematoma still draining 5 days post surgery, enter study; Still draining 10 days post surgery, return to OR for I&D
If hematoma still draining 5 days post surgery, enter study; Still draining 10 days post surgery, return to OR for I&D

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Prevent development of infection
Time Frame: 5 - 10 days following surgery
5 - 10 days following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

3M

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David A Volgas, MD, The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Draining Hematoma

Clinical Trials on Standard Pressure Dressing

3
Subscribe