China Antiretroviral Treatment Adherence for Life (AFL)

May 11, 2017 updated by: Lora Sabin, Boston University

Antiretroviral Treatment Adherence for Life Pilot Study: Phases II and III

This study focuses on collecting and analyzing quantitative data related to adherence to antiretroviral treatment from patients in Dali, China, over a one-year time-frame and generating preliminary data on an intervention designed to improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment among the study population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is a continuation of "Adherence for Life (AFL): Phase I: Exploratory Research" (H-25203), which focused on collecting and analyzing qualitative data on adherence to antiretroviral treatment (ART) among HIV-positive patients in Dali, Yunnan Province, China. Like Phase I, the AFL Pilot Study (Phases II and III) will be a collaborative effort between US researchers based in Boston, MA and Chinese researchers based in Beijing and Dali. The current study, Phases II and III, will focus on collecting and analyzing qualitative and quantitative data related to adherence to ART over a one-year time-frame and generating preliminary data on an intervention designed to improve adherence to ART among the study population. The questionnaires used in these phases of the study will draw on the results of Phase I as well as standardized instruments adapted to the Chinese context. The specific aims of the study are as follows: (1) To determine the best surrogate measure of ART adherence among the study population; (2) To determine ART adherence rates in this population; (3) To analyze the relationship between adherence factors and measured adherence rates; and (4) To generate preliminary effectiveness data on an intervention that makes use of electronic drug monitors (EDM) to improve ART adherence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Yunnan
      • Dali, Yunnan, China
        • Dali Second People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are 18 years of age or older, currently on antiretroviral treatment or about to begin it, live in the study catchment area, and are willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons below the age of 18 years, persons who are not currently on or about to start antiretroviral treatment, persons who live outside the study catchment area, or person not willing to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The intervention group patients were given their electronic drug monitoring feedback data at each monthly visit. The study coordinator would quickly calculate whether the patient's adherence was below 95% in the previous month. If so, that patient was flagged for enhanced counseling with a clinic doctor and this counseling was based on a printout containing the electronic drug monitoring data.
All patients were given electronic drug monitors that can monitor pill-taking behavior. In the intervention arm, patients and their attending doctors were given the electronic drug monitoring data on pill bottle openings at each monthly visit for use in adherence counseling sessions. Control arm patients were not given their electronic drug monitoring feedback data and their counseling sessions were based on self-reported adherence, as per standard of care in Dali.
No Intervention: Comparison
The comparison group patients were not given the data from the electronic data monitoring feedback data. Instead, they filled out a self report form that all patients fill out. If they indicated in this report that their adherence in the previous was less than 95%, then they were flagged for "enhanced counseling" with a doctor. This counseling was based on the patient's self report. Thus both groups received enhanced counseling if they indicated poor adherence, but only the intervention group were given their electronic data output.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Adherence, as Measured by Electronic Drug Monitors (EDM)
Time Frame: Month 12 (last month of 6-month intervention period) and 6-month post-intervention period
We used the electronic drug monitors (EDM) adherence metric that was found to be most strongly associated with viral suppression (HIV RNA <400 copies/ml) in analysis of the pre-intervention data, EDM 'proportion taken within dose time' (see Gill et al, 2009). This measure estimated monthly adherence as the proportion of prescribed doses taken on time, e.g., within 1 hour of scheduled dose time ([number of doses taken ±1 hour of dose time] / [total number of prescribed doses]).
Month 12 (last month of 6-month intervention period) and 6-month post-intervention period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in CD4 Count
Time Frame: Month 6, Month 12
Mean change in CD4 count (cells/µL) between Month 6 and Month 12 (pre-intervention vs. last month of intervention)
Month 6, Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lora L Sabin, PhD, Center for International Health and Development, Boston University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Electronic drug monitoring feedback data

3
Subscribe