A Clinical Investigation of the Discovery™ Elbow System

April 28, 2017 updated by: Biomet Orthopedics, LLC

A Prospective, Non-controlled, Clinical Investigation of the Discovery™ Elbow System

The purpose of this study is to perform a five-year, multi-center prospective evaluation of the Discovery™ Elbow System for outcome and durability. Relief of pain and restoration of function will determine long-term clinical outcome while durability will be measured by the absence of revisions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patient follow-up outcomes measured by the ASES score, radiographs and adverse events/revisions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33637
        • Florida Orthopedic Institute
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
        • Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt Hand Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients in need of relief from painful or disabling Joint Disease in need of total elbow replacment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis.
  • Inflammatory arthritis
  • Revision where other devices or treatments have failed
  • Correction of functional deformity
  • Treatment of acute fractures or non-union about the elbow

Patient Selection factors to be considered include:

  • Need to obtain pain relief and improve function.
  • Ability and willingness to follow instructions including control of weight and activity levels.
  • Patients who are able and willing to return for follow-up evaluations.
  • Patients with a good nutritional state.
  • Patients with full skeletal maturity.
  • Patients of all races and gender.
  • Patients who are able to follow care instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 18 years.
  • Patients with marked bone loss which would preclude proper fixation of the prosthesis.
  • Metabolic disorders, which may impair bone formation.
  • Patients who are pregnant.
  • Patients with an active or suspected infection in or around the elbow or distant foci of infections, which may spread to the implant site.
  • Patients with a highly communicable disease or diseases that may limit follow-up (e.g. immuno-compromised conditions, hepatitis, active tuberculosis, neoplastic disease, etc.).
  • Patients unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program for elbow replacement or who indicate difficulty or inability to return for follow-up visits prescribed by the study protocol.
  • Patients who qualify for inclusion in the study, but refuse consent to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Discovery™ Elbow
Discovery™ Elbow minimally constrained

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score (ASES) Pain Assessment
Time Frame: 5 years
This is a patient reported outcome measure that indicates the patient's pain as measured on the ASES form. The maximum pain score is 50 and the minimum score is 0. A higher pain score indicates the subject is in more pain. A lower pain score indicates less pain.
5 years
Patient Derived American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score (ASES) Function
Time Frame: 5 Years
This is a measure of patient function as answered by the patient. The maximum score is 36 and the minimum is 0. The maximum score represents maximum function.
5 Years
Patient Derived American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score (ASES) Satisfaction
Time Frame: 5 Years
This is a measure of patient satisfaction as answered by the patient. The maximum score is 10 and the minimum is 0. The maximum score indicates maximum satisfaction.
5 Years
Surgeon Derived American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score (ASES) Signs
Time Frame: 5 Years
This is a measure of the elbow signs as reported by the investigator. Signs include various assessments of joint tenderness, impingement, and pain in range of motion. The maximum score is 39 and the minimum is 0. The maximum score indicates the most abnormal signs.
5 Years
Surgeon Derived American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score (ASES) Stability
Time Frame: 5 Years
Surgeon assessment of patient elbow stability. Maximum instability score is 9 and the minimum is 0. The maximum score indicates the least stability.
5 Years
Surgeon Derived American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score (ASES) Strength
Time Frame: 5 Years
Measure of elbow strength as defined by the investigator. Maximum score is 20 and the minimum is 0. The maximum score indicates maximum strength.
5 Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Surviving Elbows
Time Frame: Up to 5 Years
Proportion of elbows that did not require revision or removal
Up to 5 Years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Russell Schenck, PhD, Director, Clinical Research, Biomet Orthopedics, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

3
Subscribe