Etoricoxib as a Pre-emptive Analgesic in Therapeutic Arthroscopy

September 17, 2009 updated by: Marienkrankenhaus Soest
The aim of this study is to demonstrate that compared to placebo the preoperative administration of a single dose of 120 mg etoricoxib can provide adequate pain relief in the postoperative phase while reducing the need for systemic opioids. The primary endpoint is the decrease of systemic opioid use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Depending on the pain intensity, various analgesics are used in the prevention of surgical wound pain. For severe pain, opioids like piritramide and morphine are used. These can be given at fixed intervals, continuously, as required or by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The method used depends on the equipment and supervision available and on the patient's cooperation. However, with all the methods of administration mentioned there is a risk of respiratory depression because strong opioids are used. Weak opioids like tramadol can be given as alternatives to piritramide and morphine, a combination of tramadol and metamizol having proven effective. Often an antiemetic is given as well, as many patients who receive the combination experience nausea and vomiting. For mild pain metamizol or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) is often sufficient on its own.

As some controversy is attached to the use of metamizol because of the risk of agranulocytosis (metamizol was withdrawn from the Scandinavian market in 1999), some hospitals do not use the drug. The use of NSAIDs is likewise problematic. They can cause, for example, gastric ulcers in predisposed patients. In the setting of the stress accompanying surgery, however, even previously unremarkable patients can quickly develop stress ulcers. Another problem with NSAIDs is that they affect blood clotting to various extents by inhibiting platelet aggregation. This aspect is particularly crucial in the early treatment of postoperative pain when intact blood clotting is essential. An ideal analgesic for postoperative pain would not induce respiratory depression nor affect blood clotting nor cause gastric ulcers. Because inhibiting the enzyme cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) increases the effects on the gastric mucosa and on platelet aggregation, an analgesic should selectively inhibit only the enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which mediates inflammatory processes. This is the rationale behind using COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of acute pain. With selective COX-2-inhibiting analgesics it is possible to inhibit inflammatory processes without favoring the occurrence of clotting disturbances or gastric mucosal lesions. Such an analgesic is available in the form of etoricoxib, which exhibits greater COX-2 selectivity than other coxibs so far approved. Etoricoxib has mainly been used for the treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis pain and for chronic pain (lower back pain). However, coxibs have also been used with impressive results in the treatment of acute peri- and postoperative pain. Thus, a 50 mg preoperative dose of rofecoxib not only significantly decreased the postoperative need for analgesics but also reduced postoperative pain.

Etoricoxib exhibits similar properties to rofecoxib. It is already approved for the treatment of acute pain in Australia, Latin America (except Argentina), Mexico, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia. The preoperative use of Etoricoxib could provide reliable analgesia in the postoperative phase with a potency comparable to that of NSAIDs and other coxibs but without affecting blood clotting processes or favoring the occurrence of gastric ulcers

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

66

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Soest, Germany, 59494
        • Marienkrankenhaus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

66 pat. with knee arthrosocpy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Knee arthroscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opiate addiction
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Known hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of the film tablet
  • Active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, severe hepatic dysfunction (serum albumin <25 g/l or Child-Pugh score ≥10).
  • Further exclusion criteria are congestive heart failure (NYHA II-IV), hypertension with not adequately controlled blood pressure, established ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
1
33 pat. with verum
2
33 Pat. with placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: 24h
24h

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain drugs
Time Frame: 24h
24h

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Peter Lierz, MD, Marienkrankenhaus Soest

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 20, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2009

Last Verified

September 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

3
Subscribe