Efficacy of Candesartan on Symptomatic Heart Failure in Treating Diabetic and Hypertensive Patients.

June 17, 2010 updated by: Takeda

Candesartan "Added" Therapy for Treatment Optimization of Symptomatic Heart Failure With Diastolic Dysfunction in Diabetic and Hypertensive Patients A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group and Multicenter Clinical Phase III Study Investigating the Effects on NT-proBNP Over 6 Months

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of candesartan, once daily (QD), on the N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide laboratory marker in subjects with symptomatic heart failure with diastolic dysfunction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Heart diseases are the number one cause of death in developed countries and in particular chronic or congestive heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in patients older than 65 years. It is still increasing in prevalence and, in spite of significant advances in therapy, mortality rates remain high: 30% to 40% of patients with advanced disease, and 5% to 10% of patients with mild symptoms will die within 5 to 10 years.

A relevant proportion of the heart failure patients (30 - 50%) suffering from edema and dyspnea have normal or minimally impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (preserved left ventricular ejection fraction) with diastolic abnormalities in echocardiography. Features of diastolic dysfunction are the stiffness, the decreased compliance and the impaired relaxation of the left ventricle. As a result, the left ventricle has a limited filling capacity during a normal left atrial pressure.

Hypertension and/or diabetes are the most predisposing conditions whereas left ventricular hypertrophy is regarded as the linking intermediate pathological condition. Moreover, recent studies showed that patients with symptomatic heart failure and an ejection fraction greater than 40% have a poor prognosis with relatively high mortality and hospitalization rates. Thus, in hypertensive patients, diastolic dysfunction has shown to be a predictor of morbidity.

Diastolic dysfunction is also a frequent finding in type 2 diabetes without symptoms and signs of heart disease. As long as it is independent of ischemic heart disease, it is presumably due to diabetic cardiomyopathy. Once aggravated to heart failure, diastolic dysfunction often coexists with systolic dysfunction as a consequence of coronary artery disease with a limited coronary reserve.

This study will determine whether pharmacological intervention into the Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System exerted by the Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Candesartan on top of an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-based therapy may lead to a significant drop of N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide. This neurohormonal laboratory marker is sufficient enough to simultaneously indicate the improvement of the causing diastolic dysfunction and associated heart failure symptoms as assessed by objective echocardiographic and clinical parameters.

Total time for participants in this study is approximately 26 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Bad Friedrichshall, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
      • Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
      • Ludwigsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
    • Hessen
      • Bad Homburg, Hessen, Germany
      • Bad Nauheim, Hessen, Germany
      • Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany
      • Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany
      • Giessen, Hessen, Germany
      • Kassel, Hessen, Germany
      • Limburg, Hessen, Germany
      • Melsungen, Hessen, Germany
      • Mühlheim, Hessen, Germany
      • Wiesbaden, Hessen, Germany
    • Niedersachsen
      • Nienburg, Niedersachsen, Germany
      • Northeim, Niedersachsen, Germany
      • Weyhe, Niedersachsen, Germany
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
      • Gelsenkirchen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
      • Gladbeck, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
      • Langenfeld, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
      • Paderborn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
      • Siegen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
    • Rheinland-Pfalz
      • Bad Kreuznach, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
    • Saarland
      • Neukirchen, Saarland, Germany
    • Sachsen
      • Dresden, Sachsen, Germany
      • Hartmannsdorf, Sachsen, Germany
      • Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany
      • Leisnig, Sachsen, Germany
      • Machem, Sachsen, Germany
      • Markkleeberg, Sachsen, Germany
      • Riesa, Sachsen, Germany
      • Wermsdorf, Sachsen, Germany
    • Sachsen-Anhalt
      • Coswig, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany
    • Thüringen
      • Erfurt, Thüringen, Germany
      • Jena, Thüringen, Germany
      • Nordhausen, Thüringen, Germany

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes mellitus type 2 - insulin dependent or orally treated or managed by diet for at least 3 Months.
  • Normotension or controlled hypertension with sitting Systolic Blood Pressure less than 140 mmHg and/or sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure less than 90 mmHg.
  • Regular sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation with a medicamental-achieved rate control of less than 100 bpm as confirmed by electrocardiogram recordings.
  • Echocardiographic evidence of a preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction greater than or equal to 45% (assessed by the modified Simpson method), with further doppler-echocardiographic criteria for diastolic dysfunction grade I-IV.
  • New York Heart Association classification of II or III in a stable condition since at least 3 months.
  • Existing background heart failure therapy with an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor alone or together with further preparations in a constant regimen since at least 1 month, in case of beta-blockers since at least 3 months.
  • N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide greater than or equal to 250 pg/ml measured at screening visit or collected from a dated previous laboratory document not older than 3 months.
  • No previous therapy with Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers during the last 4 weeks prior to the study.
  • Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Impaired renal function (serum creatinine greater than 2.2 mg/dl or greater than 194 μmol/l).
  • Known bilateral renal artery stenosis or interventional treatment for renal artery stenosis in the last year.
  • State after kidney transplantation.
  • Serum potassium greater than 5.5 mmol/l or glycosylated hemoglobin greater than 9.5 %.
  • Cor pulmonale or primary pulmonary disease with dyspnea at rest.
  • Known disposition to episodes of symptomatic hypotension or sitting Systolic Blood Pressure less than 95 mmHg at baseline.
  • Acute coronary syndrome or any form of unstable chronic Coronary Artery Disease where the indication of a coronary intervention is either planned in short or medium term or can not be clearly excluded for the period of the study.
  • Any history of: myocardial infarction, previous Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty with revascularization, stent implantation, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft or open heart surgery.
  • Tachycardia at rest greater than 100 bpm as confirmed by electrocardiogram recordings.
  • Known clinically relevant rhythm disorders (e.g., tachyarrhythmias, salves of supraventricular or ventricular extrasystoles or atrial fibrillation without ventricular rate control) or symptoms suggesting a significant rhythm disorder (e.g., recurrent syncopes).
  • Primary valvular diseases and/or restrictive or obstructive cardiomyopathy.
  • Existing ventricular assist devices.
  • Relevant liver diseases (cholestasis or alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal or gamma- glutamyltransferase greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal).
  • History of primary hyperaldosteronism, of cancer in the last 5 years or of another wasting disease with life expectancy of less than 2 years.
  • Known hypersensitivity to Candesartan Cilexetil.
  • Is required to take or intends to continue taking any disallowed medication, any prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may interfere with evaluation of the study medication, including:

    • Need for maintenance therapy with Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or Cox-2-inhibitors.
    • Use of other Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers.
  • Any history of life-threatening diseases.
  • History of drug addiction and/or an extensive use of alcohol.
  • Acute coronary syndrome or unstable angina pectoris and any coronary artery disease that was not stable during the last 3 months prior to inclusion.
  • Patients who are dependent on a permanently paced pacemaker (i.e. a patient with a device that is not pacing during the echocardiographic examination can enter the study).
  • Open heart surgery for other reasons than coronary revascularization
  • Participation in another clinical investigation within 30 days prior to enrolment or for the course of the present study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Candesartan QD + Heart Failure Therapy
(with angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors/beta-blockers)
Candesartan up to 32 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and ongoing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/beta-blocker therapy for up to 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • BLOPRESS®
Placebo Comparator: Placebo QD + Heart Failure Therapy
(with angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors/beta-blockers)
Candesartan matching-placebo tablets, orally, once daily and ongoing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/beta-blocker therapy for up to 24 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The change from Baseline in N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide biomarker.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean change in N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (log-transformed).
Time Frame: Weeks 6 and 24 or Final Visit.
Weeks 6 and 24 or Final Visit.
Change from Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey score.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Change from Baseline in Cystatin C.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Change from Baseline in Adiponectin.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Change from Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Change from Baseline in Urinary Albumin Excretion.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Change from Baseline in estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Cystatin C.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Mean Change in New York Heart Association classification results.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Body Weight.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Blood Pressure.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Echocardiograms.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Correlations of N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide with New York Heart Association Classification Results.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Correlations of N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide with short Form-36 Health Survey Score.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Correlations of N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide with Blood Pressure Results.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Subgroup evaluations regarding beta-blocker therapy and New York Heart Association class (II/III).
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Subgroup evaluations in terms of the different possible dosages of study medication.
Time Frame: Weeks 6 to 24 or Final Visit.
Weeks 6 to 24 or Final Visit.
Subgroup evaluations based on different baseline levels of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Subgroup evaluations based on different baseline levels of Cystatin C.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Subgroup evaluations based on different baseline levels of N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Comparison from Baseline on the concomitant use of Loop Diuretics.
Time Frame: Weeks 6 and 24 or Final Visit.
Weeks 6 and 24 or Final Visit.
Transition from sinus rhythm to permanent atrial fibrillation based on electrocardiogram recordings.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.
Progression of preserved (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction greater than or equal to 45%) to impaired systolic dysfunction (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction less than 45%), based on echocardiographic results.
Time Frame: Week 24 or Final Visit.
Week 24 or Final Visit.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 22, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2010

Last Verified

June 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BLO K026
  • 2007-003070-26 (EudraCT Number)
  • D-CAN-546 (Other Identifier: Takeda ID)
  • U1111-1113-9515 (Registry Identifier: WHO)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Candesartan

3
Subscribe