Efficacy of "On Line" Telematic Spirometry

May 15, 2012 updated by: Juan F. Masa, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
The investigators aim to demonstrate that spirometry performed "on line" with a technician in a remote place from the patient has the same efficacy as the one performed personally. As a previous study the investigators analyzed the inter-observer agreement between two pulmonary function technicians from both centers taking part in the study: San Pedro de Alcántara Hospital (Cáceres) and Carlos III hospital (Madrid). The main study will be broad (226 patients derivates from primary care to pneumology consultation), prospective, aleatorized, crossed, blind and controlled. The patients will be aleatorized in two groups: 1) personal spirometry: performed in a conventional way; 2) telematic spirometry: performed remotely "on line". The same pulmonary function technician, who will carry out the spirometries personally, will be located in a nearly room. The technician will control the computer office and the spirometer software in the patients's room with another computer. By means of teleconference, the technician will indicate the patient to start the maneuver. After 20 minutes from the end of the first spirometry, the patients will complete the protocol of the following group. The mean values of FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC, the mean time of spirometry performance, the mean number of spirometric maneuvers performed, are compared between both groups by t proof for paired data. The comparison of the percentage of proofs with non acceptability or reproducibility criteria will be made by X2 test. The analysis will be made blindly. The inter-observer and intra-observer agreement will be evaluated by analysis of intraclass correlation for FVC and FEV1 values.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

226

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cáceres, Spain, 10003
        • Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara. Servicio Extremeño de Salud

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 14 and 70 years.
  • Patients referred for pulmonary consultation from primary care center.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychophysical incapacity to performed spirometry.
  • Informed consent not obtained.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Spirometry
personal spirometry
Conventional and telematic spirometry
Experimental: Telematic Spirometry
performed remotely "on line"
Conventional and telematic spirometry

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The spirometry performed "on line" with a technician in a remote place from the patient has the same efficacy as the one performed personally and FEV1 and FVC
Time Frame: at the end of the study
at the end of the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Nº total test feasible Nº total of test Percentage of cases excluded(dropouts) for failure to obstain three acceptable and two reproducibles test
Time Frame: at the end of the study
at the end of the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Juan F. Masa, M.D, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara. Cáceres. Spain

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 13, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 16, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on spirometry

3
Subscribe