Non-Interventional Study With Aricept® Evess

March 4, 2011 updated by: Pfizer

Non-Interventional Study With Aricept® Evess In Patients Diagnosed With Mild And Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Or Vascular Dementia

The Aricept® Evess study is a prospective, non-comparative, non-interventional study on use of Aricept® Evess in the treatment of out-patients with AD and Vascular Dementia. The 24 week length of the study aims to collect data from a large number of patients (n= 400) on the safety and efficacy at the usual dosage of the product providing an overview of Aricept® Evess profile.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

370

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bucuresti, Romania, 041902
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Bucuresti, Romania, 061301
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Bucuresti, Romania
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Iasi, Romania, 700282
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Jud. Bacau
      • Bacau, Jud. Bacau, Romania, 600114
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Jud. Cluj
      • Cluj-Napoca, Jud. Cluj, Romania, 400001
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Cluj-Napoca, Jud. Cluj, Romania
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Jud. Constanta
      • Constanta, Jud. Constanta, Romania
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Jud. Dolj
      • Craiova, Jud. Dolj, Romania
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Jud. Iasi
      • Iasi, Jud. Iasi, Romania, 700282
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Jud. Prahova
      • Ploiesti, Jud. Prahova, Romania
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Jud. Timis
      • Timisoara, Jud. Timis, Romania
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients will be selected from those addressing psychiatrists on an outpatient bases, male / female, older than 50 years, being diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia, with MMSE score between 12 - 24.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatients (male / female), older than 50 years.
  • Patients with clinical symptoms of mild and moderate AD and Vascular Dementia.
  • MMSE score between 12 - 24.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a known hypersensitivity to donepezil clorhydrat, piperidine derivatives or any of the excipients of Aricept® Evess.
  • Patients with severe impaired hepatic function.
  • Patients with pre-existing gastrointestinal ulcer disease.
  • Patients with the history of bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease.
  • Patients with the history of serious atrioventricular conduction disturbances.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
1

5 mg film-coated orodispersible tablets, 10 mg film-coated orodispersible tablets.

Treatment may be started with 5 mg donepezil/ day (once-a-day dosing) and after four weeks can be titrated to 10 mg/day (once-a-day dosing).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total at Week 24 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 - 30, higher score indicated better cognitive state. Change: mean score at Week 24 LOCF minus mean score at baseline.
Baseline and Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in MMSE Total
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, 16, and 24
MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 - 30, higher score indicated better cognitive state. Change: least squares (LS) mean score at observation minus LS mean score at baseline. Changes from baseline at each week were controlled for baseline MMSE.
Baseline, Week 8, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Participants completed the FAQ for physical function. Overall scores could have ranged from 0 (independent) to 30 (dependent) where lower scores represented an improvement in physical function. Change from baseline was to be calculated as baseline scores minus week 24 scores.
Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8
Time Frame: Week 8
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Week 8
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Week 16
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Week 24
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 24 LOCF
Time Frame: Week 24
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Week 24
Number of Participants in Each Patient Domain of Benefit
Time Frame: Week 24
Participants asked to indicate if the cognition, functionality, and/or behavior domain were most benefited/improved after treatment (dichotomous yes/no endpoints where checking the CRF box next to each domain indicated 'yes' and leaving a box blank indicated 'no').
Week 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Tolerability
Time Frame: Week 24
Overall Evaluation of Tolerability at Week 24; 1=Very good, 2=Good, 3=Moderate, 4=Poor
Week 24
Number of Participants Receiving Other Medications
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Information collected and recorded by investigator in accordance with existing medical records. World Health Organization- Drug (WHO-Drug) coding dictionary applied.
Baseline and Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vascular Dementia

Clinical Trials on Aricept® Evess

3
Subscribe