- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01011153
Survey Study - Sensitivity Comparison Between MelaFind and Physician Group
Comparison of Diagnostic and Biopsy/Referral Sensitivity to Melanoma Between Three Groups of Physicians and MelaFind
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Early detection of melanoma is critical for favorable prognosis, since patients with earlier stage melanomas have a much higher probability of survival than with later stages. The traditional method of early detection has been with serial total body skin exams where the health care provider examines all skin surfaces, including mucosa, for suspicious pigmented lesions. Studies have demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of physicians for melanoma depends on the level of dermatological training. More important than being able to make a diagnosis of melanoma on clinical impression is the ability to make an appropriate decision to biopsy the lesion. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are often expected to screen for melanoma and only refer to dermatologists when there is a high clinical suspicion of melanoma. However, if PCPs are not adept at diagnosing melanoma, then opportunities for early diagnosis and treatment could be missed. Conversely, the morphology of benign pigmented lesions can often mimic that of early melanomas, resulting in potentially unnecessary dermatology referrals, biopsies, and patient anxiety. Studies have indicated that there is great variability in the ability of PCPs to make a correct decision to biopsy/refer a pigmented lesion (1.5 times greater than dermatologists) as well as for diagnosing melanoma (over 2.5 times greater than dermatologists). To aid in detection of early melanomas, new technologies are being developed.
One such technology is MelaFind, an investigational device that has been developed to give a recommendation for biopsy (or not) of pigmented skin lesions to rule out melanoma. Our hypothesis is that MelaFind will have equal or better sensitivity than pigmented lesion experts in making an appropriate recommendation for biopsy (i.e., MelaFind will be at least as accurate as dermatologists in recommending biopsy for melanomas).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Board Certified physicians or equivalent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Did not participate in EOS Protocols 20061 or 20081
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
All Dermatologists
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparison of Biopsy/Referral Sensitivity of MelaFind and Dermatologists (Pigmented Skin Lesion Experts and General Dermatologists)
Time Frame: April 2010
|
Sensitivity is the proportion of positive cases (i.e., histologically confirmed melanoma) identified as positive.
Specificity is the proportion of negative cases (i.e., histologically confirmed non-melanoma) identified as negative.
Because the number of cases given to each dermatologist varied, both sensitivity and specificity were computed for each dermatologist.
The primary outcome as stated was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of all dermatologists to that of MelaFind.
These metrics, for both the dermatologists and MelaFind, were calculated based on the same 130 lesions.
|
April 2010
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparison of Biopsy/Referral Sensitivity and Specificity of MelaFind to the Average of Biopsy/Referral Sensitivity & Specificity in Each of the Three Groups of Physicians: Pigmented Skin Lesion Experts, General Dermatologists, and Primary Care Physicians
Time Frame: December 2009
|
Sensitivity is the proportion of positive cases (i.e., histologically confirmed melanoma) identified as positive.
Specificity is the proportion of negative cases (i.e., histologically confirmed non-melanoma) identified as negative.
Because the number of cases given to each dermatologist varied, both sensitivity and specificity were computed for each dermatologist.
The primary outcome as stated was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of each group of physicians to that of Melafind, which is presented in the statistical analysis.
|
December 2009
|
Determine the Interobserver Variability in Each of the Above Metrics Within Each of the Caregiver Groups.
Time Frame: December 2009
|
Each physician was given up to 130 cases and asked whether or not they would biopsy the lesion.
Interobserver variability was measured via the kappa statistic indicating how well the physicians' answers to that question agreed within each group.
Kappa statistics are reported in the statistical analysis.
while numbers rep, they dont reflect the sgreement among the subjects
|
December 2009
|
To Compare Biopsy/Referral Performance and Diagnostic Performance Using Areas Under the Corresponding Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves That Illustrate the Trade-offs Between Sensitivity and Specificity Between Three Groups of Physicians.
Time Frame: June 2010
|
For each case reviewed, physicians were asked if they thought the lesion was a melanoma (diagnostic sensitivity/specificity) and whether or not they would biopsy or refer the lesion (biopsy/referral sensitivity/specificity.
These measurements were compared using areas under the corresponding receiver operating characteristic curves.
(see statistical analysis for results) ROC curves (reciver operating curves) are plotted on graphs with an x-axis of sensitivity and a y-axis of 1-specificity.
|
June 2010
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Suephy Chen, MD, Emory University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20063
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Melanoma
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteTurnstone Biologics, Corp.RecruitingMetastatic Melanoma | Conjunctival Melanoma | Ocular Melanoma | Unresectable Melanoma | Uveal Melanoma | Cutaneous Melanoma | Mucosal Melanoma | Iris Melanoma | Acral Melanoma | Non-Cutaneous MelanomaUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Mucosal Melanoma | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Medium/Large Size | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Small Size | Iris Melanoma | Metastatic Intraocular Melanoma | Recurrent Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IV Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC Melanoma | Stage IA Melanoma | Stage IB Melanoma | Stage IIA MelanomaUnited States
-
MelanomaPRO, RussiaRecruitingMelanoma | Melanoma (Skin) | Melanoma Stage IV | Melanoma Stage III | Melanoma, Stage II | Melanoma, Uveal | Melanoma in Situ | Melanoma, OcularRussian Federation
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI); University of VirginiaCompletedStage IIIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIC Skin Melanoma | Stage III Skin Melanoma | Stage IIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIC Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IA Skin Melanoma | Stage IB Skin Melanoma | Stage 0 Skin Melanoma | Stage I Skin Melanoma | Stage II Skin MelanomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IV Melanoma | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Medium/Large Size | Iris Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Extraocular Extension Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC MelanomaUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkTerminatedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Metastatic Intraocular Melanoma | Recurrent Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IV Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Extraocular Extension Melanoma | Stage IIIA Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IIIB Intraocular Melanoma | Stage...United States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC Melanoma | Stage IIA MelanomaUnited States
-
Emory UniversityGenentech, Inc.Active, not recruitingStage IV Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIC Skin Melanoma | Unresectable Melanoma | Stage III Melanoma | Stage IIIA Skin Melanoma | Cutaneous Melanoma, Stage III | Cutaneous Melanoma, Stage IVUnited States
-
BiocadRecruitingMelanoma | Melanoma (Skin) | Melanoma Stage IV | Melanoma Stage III | Melanoma Metastatic | Melanoma Unresectable | Melanoma AdvancedIndia, Russian Federation, Belarus