(A Novel Pharmacologic Regime for Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) (REDUCED)

December 24, 2013 updated by: Hasan ARI, Bursa Postgraduate Hospital

A RandomisED StUdy Comparing Standard Systemic Anticoagulation ThErapy to Low Dose Intracoronary Anticoagulation Therapy for Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The hypothesis:

Low dose intracoronary unfractionated heparin is as effective and safe as standard dose intravenous unfractionated heparin on patients with elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aim:

Primary objective:To evaluate the efficiency and safety of low dose intracoronary unfractioned heparin (UFH) on elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Secondary objective:

  • To evaluate the effect of low dose intracoronary UFH on myocardial ischemia after PCI.
  • To evaluate the effect of low dose intracoronary UFH on bleeding complications after PCI.
  • To evaluate the cost-effectivity of low dose intracoronary UFH on elective PCI

Study central:

  • Bursa Postgraduate Hospital, Cardiology Clinic

Study population:

  • we planned to enrol 200 patients.
  • Patients will randomise in two groups (control group:100 patients, study group:100 patients)

Study works:-Write case report form for all patients

  • Control for inclusion criteria
  • Demographic data (age, gender)
  • Height, weight, BMI and glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
  • Risk factors
  • laboratory data (biochemical and hematologic)
  • Medication history
  • Echocardiographic data
  • Angiographic data
  • Procedure time
  • PCI data(vessel diameter, stent diameter, lesion and stent length, performed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or not, etc)
  • Before and after procedure (activated clotting time) ACT value
  • Before and after procedure troponin I (TnI) and Creatine kinase MB (CKMB) levels
  • Note complication (MACE, bleeding, hematoma etc)
  • Note femoral compression time.

    4 weeks later note the first control data.

Six months later note the second control data.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bursa, Turkey, 16320
        • Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patients; who have planned elective PCI and have had written informed consent for participation to study.
  • The native coronary artery;

    • lesion with narrowing >=70%,
    • lesion without thrombus
    • no left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesion
    • no chronic total occlusion lesion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients have allergy for acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), Clopidogrel and heparin
  • Patients who performed primary PCI
  • Patients with acute coronary syndrome
  • Patients with have a history of myocardial infarction (MI) for two weeks
  • Patients who were use UFH or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 24 hours
  • Patients on warfarin therapy
  • Patients who have bleeding diathesis, or have high risk for bleeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low dose intracoronary heparin
Low dose intracoronary heparin: In this group elective coronary intervention was performed with low dose intracoronary Heparin
elective coronary intervention
Active Comparator: Standard treatment arm
Standard treatment arm: In this group elective coronary intervention performed with standard dose intravenous heparin
elective coronary intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Major Adverse Cardiac Event
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hasan Arı, MD, Bursa Postgraduate Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 14, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on coronary intervention

3
Subscribe