Total Skeletal Irradiation in Multiple Myeloma Before Second Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

May 14, 2016 updated by: Gordon Phillips, MD, University of Rochester

Evaluation of a Method Designed to Improve Outcome of HD Chemotherapy and AHSCT for Patients With Myeloma: Total Marrow Irradiation Administered Via Helical Tomotherapy Plus High-Dose Melphalan and Amifostine Before AHSCT2

The purpose of this study is to improve the efficacy of the HDC regimen by adding a novel, "targeted" means administering a variation of total body irradiation (TBI) radiation i.e., total skeletal irradiation (TSI) administered by helical tomotherapy (HT) before, and in addition to the current standard of HDC, at a dose of 200 mg/m2 (HDMel200). The underlying postulate of this endeavor is that TSI-HT will provide additional cytoreduction to HDMel alone, without producing additional (serious) toxicity. We will utilize a classical Phase I study design (i.e., dose escalation) in myeloma patients undergoing AHSCT2 to define a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Finally, although comparisons to other therapies are not typical (and/or feasible) for a Phase I study, we will compare, whenever possible, both the toxicity and the antimyeloma activity of the AHSCT2 to AHSCT1.

This protocol will standardize, as much as possible the use of AHSCT2 both as a "tandem" and "salvage" procedure. Since sufficient AHSC (CD34+ cells) are routinely collected in adequate numbers for multiple AHSCTs, but recently used infrequently, it is important to work towards defining the optimal utilization of this resource.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

While HDC/AHSCT is active most patients eventually relapse; obviously, those with lesser responses progress as well. Many investigators regard HDC/AHSCT as a "mature" modality a useful if fixed element in an evolving treatment paradigm that focuses on the introduction of new (non-HDC/AHSCT) agents with unique mechanisms of action. However, data from several related sources (including both the syngeneic and second ["tandem" or salvage] AHSCT experience), suggests that the efficacy of HDC/AHSCT could be improved by obtaining better cytoreduction of the HDC component, thus prolonging survival and possibly even producing an increase in cures. However, to do so will require additional attention to the sources of relapse following HDC/AHSCT, mainly the residual myeloma in the patient, but perhaps also the inadvertent reinfusion of clonogenic myeloma cells in the AHSCT. For reasons discussed herein, this study will focus on the former.

We believe that the agents with more potent activity vs. the (multiple) myeloma cancer stem cell (MM-CSC) and/or their microenvironment are ultimately needed to increase the cure rate in myeloma. Unfortunately, preliminary data suggest current modalities used in myeloma therapy are only variably effective vs. these targets, and that newer agents with such activity are only now becoming available for clinical trials.

The use of these newer agents are most likely to augment, not supplant, current modalities, lending even more urgency to optimizing existing elements to try to improve the efficacy of HDC/AHSCT and especially to determine if activity vs. MM-CSC and/or the microenvironment of these current modalities can be augmented. Radiation seems especially attractive to re-evaluate, given new, "targeted" methods of administration such as those described herein. Impetus for this effort comes from the known radiosensitivity of clonogenic myeloma cells (a population that at least may contain MM-CSC), and especially given the ability of local radiotherapy to provide local disease control in myeloma, and especially given the ability of local radiotherapy to cure some patients with solitary plasmacytoma "proving" activity of radiotherapy vs. MM-CSC in this closely-related diagnosis.

It is important to note that improvement in current modalities may offer better clinical outcomes even if major effects vs. the MM-CSC and microenvironment interaction are not produced. We do not currently have the ability to measure such effects; this will not be part of this trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age </= 70 years
  • Documented myeloma confirmed at protocol entry
  • Adequate presence of >/=2.0x10e6/kg cryopreserved CD34+ cells
  • Adequate organ function
  • Prior therapy is allowed as long as the organ function parameters are maintained and/or excessive radiation exposure is not produced
  • Chemosensitivity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled infection
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Patients in >/= very good partial response after initial primary non-transplant therapy and/or AHSCT1
  • Patients unwilling to practice adequate forms of contraception if clinically indicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Total Skeletal Irradiation
Three subjects determined to be eligible for study and agree to participate are assigned to receive 200 cGy of TSI-HT for 5 days. If this dose level is well tolerated in the first 3 subjects, the dose will be increased and given over 5 days. The dose will continue to be increased until the maximum toelrated dose is reached.
Escalating doses of TSI starting at 200cGy (escalating up to 400cGy unless maximum tolerated dose is determined in lower dose level) in cohort 1 over 5 days followed by high dose melphalan and cytoprotection followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Define the maximum tolerated dose of a derived high dose therapy regimen
Time Frame: Day 100 post transplant
MTD of high dose therapy consisting of escalating doses of Total Skeletal Irradiation administered via Helical Tomotherapy, followed by standard high dose chemotherapy of high dose Melphalan (200mg/m2) with amifostine cytoprotection before AHSCT.
Day 100 post transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of TSI-HT therapy
Time Frame: Day 100 post transplant
This objective will also include detailed short and long term assessment of hematopoiesis even if it is not the dose limiting toxicity.
Day 100 post transplant
Compare toxicities to those produced by the AHSCT1 regimen
Time Frame: Day 100 post transplant
Determine if quantity and severity of toxicities of TSI regimen are less than toxicities experienced in AHSCT1.
Day 100 post transplant
Compare antitumor results obtained by TSI-HT before AHSCT
Time Frame: End of study (June 2013 - anticipated)
Compare using standard outcome parameters (ie; response rate, relapse rate, disease-free survival or progression-free survival and overall survival) to high dose chemotherapy/AHSCT1
End of study (June 2013 - anticipated)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gordon Phillips, MD, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 16, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Total Skeletal Irradiation

3
Subscribe