Topical Cyclosporine for Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) in Rwanda

September 28, 2010 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Topical Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in a Rwandan Eye Clinic; a Prospective Randomized Double-masked Clinical Trial

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a bilateral, chronic, external ocular inflammatory disease of unknown cause. It is a fairly common disease in hot, dry environments, representing as much as 3% of severe ophthalmic diseases and up to 33% of all eye pathology seen among young patients in eye clinics in Central Africa. Symptoms and signs can persist for years with an important visual morbidity and social impact. Corneal changes (e.g. corneal ulcers) can be sight threatening, occurring in up to 10% of VKC children. Topical steroid therapy remains the current standard treatment, but in developing countries its use often is chronic and not medically supervised, potentially leading to bacterial infections, steroid-induced glaucoma and cataract. Chromoglycate drops have less side effects but lack the power to control a flare-up. Topical cyclosporine has the potential to offer an efficient but safer alternative to steroid drops in the management of VKC in an African setting. Its safety and efficiency in the management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis have been described in several uncontrolled studies and double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, but those studies were relatively small and involved populations outside Africa with predominantly palpebral and mixed forms of VKC. Controversy still remains on the efficiency of cyclosporine in severe forms of allergic conjunctivitis like VKC. We therefore undertake a larger prospective randomized double-masked, standard treatment controlled clinical trial in Central Africa to compare the short-term efficiency of cyclosporine A (CsA) 2% eye drops, solved in olive oil vehicle, with that of steroid drops in predominantly limbal forms of VKC. During 4 weeks the participants will be randomised to either cyclosporine or dexamethasone as attack treatment for VKC. The 4 weeks thereafter all participants will receive chromoglycate drops as maintenance treatment. Additional objectives are to document any difference in rebound phenomenon while on chromoglycate during the maintenance phase between the 2 treatment groups and to evaluate safety and tolerance of the test medication.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

366

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gitarama/Muhanga, Rwanda
        • Kabgayi Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- at least 5 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • being pregnant
  • suffering from any other infectious or inflammatory ocular pathology
  • using topical/ systemic corticosteroids, antihistamines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or immunosuppressives 2 weeks prior to the trial
  • been treated with steroid injection 6 months prior to the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cyclosporine A
Cyclosporine A (CsA) 2% eye drops
Cyclosporine 2% eye drops
Active Comparator: Dexamethasone
Dexamethasone 0,1% eye drops
Dexamethasone 0,1% eye drops

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in score for symptoms and clinical signs between treatment arms
Time Frame: After 4 weeks at the end of 4 weeks test medication

Differences in scores for symptoms and clinical signs individually and as a composite score between the treatment arms.

Symptoms are itchiness, tearing, stinging, discharge and photophobia. Signs are subtarsal scarring, limbal cysts, pseudogerontoxon, pseudomembrane, corneal plaque, shield-ulcer, bulbar hyperaemia, limbal pigmentation, punctate keratitis, tarsal plate papillae, corneal astigmatism, limbal follicles, conjunctivalisation of the cornea and trantas dots.

After 4 weeks at the end of 4 weeks test medication

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speed of symptom/sign reduction
Time Frame: At 2 weeks while on test medication and at 8 weeks at the end of a chromoglycate maintenance phase
To document any difference between the 2 treatment groups in speed of symptom/sign reduction during the attack treatment and in rebound phenomenon while on chromoglycate during the maintenance phase
At 2 weeks while on test medication and at 8 weeks at the end of a chromoglycate maintenance phase
Safety and tolerance of the test medication
Time Frame: At 2 weeks while on test medication and at 8 weeks at the end of a chromoglycate maintenance phase
To evaluate safety and tolerance of the test medication.
At 2 weeks while on test medication and at 8 weeks at the end of a chromoglycate maintenance phase

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philippe Kesteleyn, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Ghent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

September 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 29, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2010

Last Verified

September 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

Clinical Trials on Cyclosporine A

3
Subscribe