Implementation of an Integrated Primary Care Network for Prevention and Management of Cardiometabolic Risks (RCM)

March 29, 2011 updated by: Public Health Department, Montreal

Implementation of an Integrated Primary Care Network for Prevention and Management of Cardiometabolic Risks (RCM)

CONTEXTE: L'Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal (ASSS) invited our research team to evaluate the implementation of an integrated and interdisciplinary primary care network for prevention and management of cardiometabolic risks (diabetes and hypertension) (PCR). The intervention is based on the Chronic Care Model and the development of an integrated services network. PCR is to be implemented in 6 territories of "Centre de santé et de services sociaux (CSSS)". A first application for funding was made to Fonds Pfizer-FRSQ-MSSS for an evaluation that has to be completed in the first 24 month after the beginning of the implementation. This application to the PHSI program at CIHR is complementary and will ensure an evaluation of the sustainability of PCR and of long term effects (40 months after the beginning of the implementation) for patients and for their primary care physicians.

In each CSSS, PCR plans for : 1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors of "Réseau local de services (RLS)" insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.

OBJECTIVES: 1-evaluate PCR effects according to territory, time and degree of exposure (specifically benefits to registered patients and support to participating primary care physicians); 2- identify the degree of implementation of PCR in each CSSS territory and the related contextual factors; 3- examine the relationship between the effects identified, the degree of implementation of PCR and the related contextual factors; 4- assess the impact of implementing PCR on the strengthening of RLS.

METHODS: The proposed evaluation will be done through a mixed design including two complementary strategies. Using a "quasi-experiment/before-after" design, the first strategy is a quantitative approach looking at the program effects and their variation between territories. This analysis will use data from the PCR clinical database (ex.: HbA1c, BP, lifestyle) and from patient questionnaire inquiring about care experience, utilization of services, chronic care follow-up, self-management and quality of life. Around 3000 patients will be enlisted. A primary care physician questionnaire will enquire about PCR effects on their practice. Using primarily a qualitative and a case study approach, each of the 6 territories being one case, the second strategy will identify the degree of implementation of PCR and the explanatory contextual factors. This analysis with use data obtained from semi-structured interviews with program managers. The results of this analysis will be summarized in a monograph for each territory. According to the type of indicator analyzed, objective 3 will be fulfilled using linear models or longitudinal multilevel models supplemented with an interpretive approach using the information from monographs and discussion groups. The impact of implementing PCR on RLS will be assessed through interviews with key informants.

RESULTS AND EXPECTED IMPACT: Our study will identify the effectiveness of PCR and contextual factors associated with successful implementation and sustainability of PCR. Detailed contextual information will allow application of our results to other environments that have similar context and to other chronic conditions that could benefit from an integrated services network.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: Since decision makers, clinicians and researchers did and will take part in all phases of PRC evaluation (planning, data collection, analysis and interpretation), diffusion of information regarding the program is an integral part of the research process. In addition, results will be presented at local, regional, provincial and national conferences and published in reports and articles widely distributed. More specifically, a regional symposium will be organized to share evaluation results with all CSSS in the region (n=12) and with all our local and regional partners.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

3000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 1M3
        • Public Health Department
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pierre Tousignant, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetic adults with borderline fasting blood sugar or glucose intolerance or treated with diet only or treated with only one medication or treated with multiple medications but with Hb A1c ≤ 8%;
  • Adults with blood pressure in office ≥ 140/90 mm Hg (if diabetes present, BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 1
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 1 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 2
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 2 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 3
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 3 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 4
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 4 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 5
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 5 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 6
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 6 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diabetes and Hypertension control
Time Frame: 24 months after registration
Biomedical indicators of diabetes (Hb A1c ≤7%) and hypertension (blood pressure ≤ 140/90) control
24 months after registration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effects on patient's behavior
Time Frame: 24 months after registration
Life-style improvement (physical activity, nutrition, smoking)
24 months after registration
Effects on patient's autonomy
Time Frame: 24 months after registration
Self-care
24 months after registration
Effects on patient's health
Time Frame: 24 months after registration
Quality of live
24 months after registration
Effects on follow-up of chronic diseases
Time Frame: 24 months after registration
Chronic care management
24 months after registration
Effects on process of care
Time Frame: 24 months after registration
Indexes of continuity, accessibility, comprehensiveness and perceived quality of care
24 months after registration
Effects on physician practice
Time Frame: 24 months after registration
Physician perception regarding effects of program on patients, inter-professional collaboration, development of knowledge, management of diabetes and hypertension
24 months after registration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Tousignant, MD, Public Health Department, Montreal

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 30, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RisqueCardioMetabolique
  • FRSQ 22425 (Other Identifier: Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Chronic care management 1-6

3
Subscribe