- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01340144
Evaluation of Patellar Crepitus Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
March 4, 2015 updated by: Colorado Joint Replacement
Evaluation of Patellar Crepitus Following PFC Sigma vs. PFC Sigma HP Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Femoral Component Design Make a Difference?
Analyze clinical data for a group of subjects implanted with a new surgical device designed to reduce the incidence of patellar crepitus following PCL-substituting TKA and compare that to a control group of subjects implanted with a TKA design known to have an incidence of patellar crepitus of approximately 5%.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
Patellar crepitus and clunk following posterior cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty is a persistent problem with a reported incidence as high as 14%.
The development of this complication necessitates additional surgery in some patients.
Numerous etiologies have been reported including design of the femoral component.
Due to a higher than desired incidence of patellar crepitus with the PFC Sigma PS TKA, design modifications of the trochlear groove of the femoral component were introduced with the release of the PFC Sigma HP PS femoral component.
The purpose of the proposed study is to evaluate the incidence of patellar crepitus after posterior cruciate substituting TKA utilizing the PFC Sigma vs. the PFC Sigma HP PS femoral components.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
1250
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Colorado Joint replacement clinic
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- subjects that received primary total knee replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Did not return for follow - up appointments Required any post operative manipulation
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
PFC Sigma PS TKA
one group received primary TKA using the PFC Sigma PS TKA
|
PFC Sigma HP PS TKA
One group received primary TKA using the PFC Sigma HP PS TKA.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluate for the Incidence of Patellar Crepitus Requiring Non-operative vs. Operative Treatment of Both the Study and Control Groups at a Minimum of 12 Months Following the TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty) Procedure in Each Subject.
Time Frame: Two years after TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty) procedure
|
The incidence of patellar crepitus and clunk will be statistically compared between the study (PFC Sigma HP PS TKA) and control (PFC Sigma PS TKA groups).
Based on a strength analysis to determine a theoretical reduction in the incidence of patellar crepitus from 5% to 2%, a study group of 625 subjects in both the control and study ggroups will be required.
Each group will also be statistically analyzed using the following variables: overall crepitus incidence, incidence of crepitus requiring only non-operative treatment vs. those requiring operative treatment to manage this complication.
|
Two years after TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty) procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Raymond Kim, MD, Porter Adventist Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
April 22, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
March 25, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 4, 2015
Last Verified
March 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIS-000112
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Total Knee Replacement
-
Central DuPage HospitalTerminatedTotal Knee Replacement | Replacement, Total Knee | Arthroplasty, Knee ReplacementUnited States
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteThe Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical AssociationCompletedTotal Hip Replacement | Total Knee ReplacementCanada
-
Singapore General HospitalCompletedTotal Knee Arthroplasty | Total Knee ReplacementSingapore
-
Istanbul UniversityCompleted
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedTotal Knee Arthroplasty | Total Knee ReplacementTurkey
-
Mayo ClinicStryker OrthopaedicsCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Total Knee ReplacementUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedKnee Arthroplasty, Total | Knee Replacement, TotalUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedKnee Total Joint Replacement | Hip Total Joint ReplacementUnited States
-
Isfahan University of Medical SciencesCompletedTotal Knee Replacement | Total Knee Arthroplasty(TKA)Iran, Islamic Republic of
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingTotal Knee Replacement