Information to Parents of Children With Cancer. An Exploratory Study

December 1, 2014 updated by: Ulla Hallgren Graneheim, Umeå University
The aim of this study is to explore whether an intensified informational intervention built upon the Representational approach framework can reduce stress in parents of children with cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND

Parents of children with cancer have great information needs and report that these are not always met. Psychosocial suffering such as stress and anxiety is also common in this group.

HYPOTHESIS

An informational intervention emanating from the needs identified by parents is associated to decreased perceived stress, decreased depressive symptoms, decreased anxiety, increased satisfaction with information and decreased use of health care contacts in parents.

INTERVENTION

The intervention builds upon the Representational approach. This approach emanates from Leventhal's theories of illness representations and theories of conceptual change. Central qualities in the approach is that parents identify the area where information is needed themselves and that a thorough assessment of their current representation of that area is performed before information is given.

Each participating parent receives three rounds that consist of two meetings. Each round starts with a meeting where the parent identifies an area where he/she needs more information. The nurse and the parent jointly survey the parent's representation of the area and discusses consequences of knowledge gaps or misunderstandings. Then, new information is introduced and benefits from the new information is discussed. After some days, a follow-up meeting takes place.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The intervention will be evaluated using a single-case design (A-B-A-B-A-B-A) with 10 parents. All parents will receive the intervention, and repeated measures of the outcome variables both before and after will be used to assess the effect of the intervention. Data will be collected by web questionnaires with SMS- and e-mail reminders.

In parallel, a process evaluation aiming at describing treatment fidelity, experiences of participation and impact of contextual factors on the results. For this aim, qualitative interviews with participants and audio recording of intervention sessions will be used.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Västerbotten
      • Umeå, Västerbotten, Sweden, 90185
        • Umeå University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a parent of a child that

    1. is diagnosed with a first occurrence of a malignancy that is curatively treated
    2. was diagnosed two months ago
  • Able to talk, read and write Swedish enough to be able to participate without an interpreter
  • Have access to a computer and an internet connection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Representational approach
The Representational approach as described in the detailed description.
The Representational approach as described in the detailed description. Each participating parent receives three rounds that consist of two meetings. Each round starts with a meeting where the parent identifies an area where he/she needs more information. The nurse and the parent jointly survey the parent's representation of the area and discusses consequences of knowledge gaps or misunderstandings. Then, new information is introduced and benefits from the new information is discussed. After some days, a follow-up meeting takes place.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived stress
Time Frame: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).
As measured by the Perceived stress scale (PSS). 10 items answered on a 5-point Likert scale.
Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical symptoms from stress
Time Frame: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).
Includes headache, sleep disturbances, palpitations, and heartburn, each measured on a 4-point scale.
Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).
Anxiety
Time Frame: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).
Measured on a 7-point visual digital scale.
Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).
Measured on a 7-point visual digital scale.
Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).
Satisfaction with information
Time Frame: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).
Includes general satisfaction with the information from the health care professionals as well as information from the intervention nurses. Measured on a 7-point visual digital scale.
Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).
Healthcare contacts
Time Frame: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured once a week for a total of 11 weeks).
Number of contacts with the health care system concerning the ill child and the parent's own health problems.
Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured once a week for a total of 11 weeks).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ulla Hällgren Graneheim, Associate professor, Umea University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Representational approach

3
Subscribe