Evaluation of Effectiveness of Treatment Paradigm for Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients in China (NEW2D)

February 13, 2013 updated by: China Cardiometabolic Registries

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Treatment Paradigm for Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients in China (NEW2D STUDY) A Study Of China Cardiometabolic Registries (CCMR)

This is a study to gain better understanding on how those patients who are newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes are treated and monitored. The study will record information such as type of therapy, therapeutic outcomes, and patients' satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The prevalence of diabetes around the world has increased from 30 million in 1985 to the current 235 million, and is expected to grow to 300 million in 2030, with more than 75 percent occurring in countries such as India and China. In China, economic prosperity and changes in diet and lifestyles have resulted in steep increase in prevalence of overweight, obesity, and diabetes. According to the latest study, in adults of 20 years of age or older, the incidence of diabetes has reached 9.7% and the prevalence 92.4 million. In a nationwide, cross over cohort study that was recently completed in China, the results showed that the duration of diabetes is positively correlated with the incidence of CAD and all microvascular diabetic complications. Preventing diabetes progression and preventing the onset of cardiovascular diseases early on at the stage of newly diagnosis is thus one of the most important goals in managing type 2 diabetes.

According to the Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Diabetes, which is consistent with IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes, the therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes is defined as HbA1C < 6.5%. Various national surveys conducted in China in 2003, 2004, 2006 have shown that only about one forth of type 2 diabetes patients in China reached this therapeutic target.Over the recent few years, a number of new antidiabetic treatments, such as DPP-IV inhibitors, have been introduced to the real world practice of diabetes management in China, creating exciting opportunities to potentially improve glycemic control. UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study) provided the evidence for improving glycemic control through aggressive treatment in western population. There is now substantial evidence on management of patients with type 2 diabetes. However, it is believed that not all patients have benefited from optimal diabetes management in China, partially due to diversity of standards of clinical practices and complexity of diabetes care itself. For example, it is unclear which treatment regimen works more effectively for managing newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients or whether a more aggressive strategy be used during the early stage of treatment. Moreover, it remains answering that what other factors may influence the treatment outcomes. There are clearly significant unmet needs and thus significant opportunities to leverage the existing medical advancement.

This study is thus designed to evaluate current treatment patterns and treatment outcomes for managing newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients and to assess specific unmet needs, influencing factors, management platforms, and gaps and trends in practice, providing a comprehensive knowledge in current management of newly diagnosed diabetes and insight on opportunities and strategy for future research and development of improved therapy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

5000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • People's Hospital of Peking University
      • Xian, China
        • Xijing Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects seen at outpatient clinics of tier 1, 2, and 3 hospitals across the 6 major geographic regions

Description

  • 20 years of age or older
  • Confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes made within past 6 months according to the 2010 Chinese Guideline for Type 2 diabetes
  • Have not received any pharmacological treatment for T2D, or have started on one regimen and have not switched or added any other hypoglycemic agent
  • Have completed a lab test +/- 30 days of the baseline visit or is due for a lab evaluation including HbA1C, serum glucose, lipid profile, and other routine tests
  • Willing to return for all follow up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are not willing or not able to return to the same hospital for follow up visits every 3 months for one year after enrollment (e.g. do no reside locally)
  • Patients who are participating in another interventional clinical trials
  • Patients who are not willing to sign informed consent form

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Diagnosed within 6 months
No (test) intervention to be adminisitered

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary endpoint of this study is the overall proportion of patients whose HbA1c is less than 6.5%, measured at the end of one year follow up.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportions of patients receiving various regimen, and the duration of each regimen
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The clinical effectiveness of each regimen measured by the proportion of patients reaching the target glycemic control
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 15, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

3
Subscribe