Impact and Utility of PET Versus Clinical Score for the Assessment of Inflammatory Activity in Takayasu Arteritis

March 23, 2012 updated by: Jose Telich, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez

Impact and Utility of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for the Assessment of Inflammatory Activity Arteritis Versus Clinical Score and Laboratory Values in Takayasu Arteritis: a Cohort Study

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that [18F]FDG PET is a a better method than clinical and laboratory values for the identification and assessment of inflammatory activity in patients with Takayasu Arteritis (TA), allowing long-term follow-up with a precise evaluation of response to therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Inflammatory activity and fibrosis are the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with Takayasu arteritis. The investigators objective is to determine the utility of using 18F-FDG PET in the basal evaluation and follow-up of patients and compare the results with Dabague's clinical score.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DF
      • Mexico, DF, Mexico
        • Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients treated for TA at our institution's immunology outpatient clinic were included between.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • TA was diagnosed if the patient met 3 or more ACR criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria E Soto, MD, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia
  • Study Director: Erick Alexanderson, MD, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 14, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 27, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Takayasu Arteritis

3
Subscribe