Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Primary Esophageal Achalasia (TAMEO)

May 22, 2015 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon
Recommended therapies for esophageal achalasia are endoscopic pneumatic dilation and Heller-Dor surgical myotomy. Endoscopic myotomy has been recently proposed in human patient in expert centers in Japan, US and Germany. In theory, endoscopic myotomy is as effective as surgical myotomy but less invasive and more effective with less complications than endoscopic pneumatic dilation. Up to now, published studies have confirmed these expectations, with 100% efficacy and no clinically significant complications. The present clinical trial with study the security and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy in primary achalasia patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Clinique de Hépatogastroentérologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients of both sexes aged over 18 years old
  2. Patients who have signed the informed consent form before any study related procedure
  3. Primary achalasia of the cardia with Eckardt score > 3
  4. Non sigmoid achalasia or S1 sigmoid type achalasia at barium meal Rx study
  5. ASA score (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) 1 or 2
  6. Patients affiliated to a social security health system

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with age less than 18 years old
  2. Patients without discernment with legal protection
  3. Patients who will not be able to abide with study follow-up as judged by the investigator
  4. Patients which cannot provide a written informed consent
  5. Patient refusing to participate in the study, without informed consent
  6. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, women in fertile age for procreation without efficient contraception, and/or positive serum βHCG test
  7. Concomitant participation in other clinical trial
  8. S2 sigmoid type primitive achalasia of the cardia
  9. Pseudo-achalasia (esophageal carcinoma),
  10. History of Barrett's esophagus with or without dysplasia, malignant tumors of the esophagus
  11. History of esophageal strictures, systemic sclerosis
  12. History of esophageal varices
  13. History of endoscopic or surgical therapy of the esophageal achalasia
  14. History of inferior endoscopic or surgical esophageal sphincter manipulation (sutures, polymers injection, adhesive bands)
  15. History of surgical interventions of the esophagus or stomach (fundoplication, Heller-Dor myotomy, gastric resections, vagotomy with or without gastric drainage)
  16. History of congenital of acquired coagulation anomalies: hemorrhagic diseases, hemostasis disturbances (TP < 60%, TCA > 40 seconds, platelets < 60000/mmc)
  17. ASA score (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) 3, 4, 5 or 6
  18. Cancer, liver, respiratory, renal or heart failure which put the patients in the ASA risk group 3,4,5 or 6.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single Arm
Peroral endoscopic myotomy

An endoscopy is performed under anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. After submucosal saline injection, an entry point in the submucosal space is created at 10 cm above the cardia. The endoscope will create a 12cm long tunnel in the caudal direction by submucosal dissection, stopping at 2cm below cardia. Then the muscular circular internal layer is sectioned on a 9cm length, starting 3 cm below the submucosal entry point. At the end the submucosal entry point is closed with metallic clips. A scanner is performed after the procedure so as to check the esophageal wall integrity. Alimentation is progressively introduced at day 1.

This is a study of a procedure - peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). No new, unapproved device is used. All endoscopic tools are already approved for endoscopic submucosal dissection and associated complications (hemorrhage or perforation): dissection knifes, hot biopsy forceps, endoscopic metallic clips.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with clinically significant perforation
Time Frame: Day 1 after procedure

Clinically significant perforation is defined as an ensemble of procedural, clinical, biological and imaging parameters:

  • perforation seen during procedure with placement of endoscopic metallic clips as closing method
  • acute severe persistent pain, fever over 38.5°C, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, penumoperitoneum
  • elevated white blood count with elevated neutrophils and elevated CRP, ascending values
  • subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, penumoperitoneum seen at imaging studies (day 1 CT scan)
Day 1 after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
percentage of patients with Eckardt score less than 3
Time Frame: at 3rd and 12th month after procedure
Eckardt score calculated at baseline and after procedure
at 3rd and 12th month after procedure
significant variation of Eckardt score
Time Frame: at baseline and at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month after the procedure
Eckardt score calculated at baseline and after procedure
at baseline and at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month after the procedure
significant variation of GIQLI score
Time Frame: at baseline and at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month after the procedure
GIQLI score calculated at baseline and after procedure
at baseline and at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month after the procedure
significant variation of high resolution manometry parameters
Time Frame: at baseline and at 3rd month after the procedure
high resolution manometry performed at baseline and at 3rd month after the procedure
at baseline and at 3rd month after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thierry PONCHON, Pr, Hospices Civiles de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Achalasia

Clinical Trials on Peroral endoscopic myotomy

3
Subscribe