Technical Evaluation of Brahms PCT Direct

December 11, 2014 updated by: Philipp Schuetz

Technical Evaluation of a Whole Blood Rapid Test Measuring Procalcitonin (BRAHMS PCT Direct)

Validation of the technical performance of the BRAHMS PTC direct point-of-care assay under routine conditions with native patient samples. The clinical validation is planned as a method comparison to a reference method (BRAHMS PCT sensitive KRYPTOR, Elecsys BRAHMS PCT). The study hypothesis is to show a highest correlation between the new product and the reference methods.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a highly sensitive and specific marker which can be detected in the blood stream in response to a bacterial infection. In contrast to conventional infection disease markers PCT permits the differential diagnosis between bacterial and viral infections. The marker is implemented on Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Emergency Departments (ED) worldwide since 1996. Until now various technologies all basing on the use of serum or plasma samples are available in the market.

BRAHMS GmbH (Clinical Diagnostics Division of Thermo Fisher Scientific) as manufacturer of the Procalcitonin assays has developed a new quantitative immunochromatographic whole blood point-of-care assay, the BRAHMS PCT direct. The test follows the principle of a sandwich assay with two anti-PCT antibodies, one immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane and the tracer antibodies labeled with gold.

Validation of the technical performance of the product under routine conditions with native patient samples. The clinical validation is planned as a method comparison to a reference method (BRAHMS PCT sensitive KRYPTOR, Elecsys BRAHMS PCT). The internal pre-studies were performed with blood samples spiked with recombinant PCT and with native patient samples.

The primary objective of this study is to show a highest correlation between BRAHMS PCT direct with the PCT reference method for PCT- positive and negative samples.

The secondary object of this study is to show the advantage of BRAHMS PCT direct in time to result in comparison to the reference method.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 7565
        • Pitié Salpetrière. Groupement hospitalière universitaire Est
      • Potsdam, Germany, 14467
        • Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, gemeinnützige GmbH Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Humboldt-Universität Berlin (Charité)
    • Aargau
      • Aarau, Aargau, Switzerland, 5001
        • Kantonsspital Aarau Innere Medizin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

One cohort of 150-250 patients, possible infection at initial presentation in Kantonsspital Aarau.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • possible infection at initial presentation
  • informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between BRAHMS PCT direct and reference method.
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Showing at least 90% correlation between BRAHMS PCT direct with the PCT reference method for PCT- positive and negative samples.
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to result
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
The secondary object of this study is to show the advantage of BRAHMS PCT direct in time to result in comparison to the reference method.
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philipp Schuetz, PD, Dr.med., Kantonsspital Aarau

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • POC_1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection

3
Subscribe