The Effects of Dexmedetomidine to Postoperative Awakening and Extubation-related Changes in Blood Pressure

May 4, 2017 updated by: Tampere University Hospital

The Effects of Postoperative Dexmedetomidine Sedation to Haemodynamics During Extubation

The postoperative removal of intubation tube induces a noticeable sympathic response and increase of blood pressure. The risk of complications is especially elevated with the patients having cardiac surgery. Though sedation inhibits the sympathetic responses to extubation, according to the current protocol the propofol infusion has to be discontinued well before extubation because of its inhibitory effects on breathing centers.

Dexmedetomidine is relatively new anesthesia drug. Dexmedetomidine is unique in its characteristic that it does not have the paralyzing effect on breathing. The aim of our study is to work out whether dexmedetomidine-extended propofol sedation over the extubation diminishes the aforementioned harmful effects of the extubation procedure.

Study design is prospective double-blinded randomized study. The investigators compare two groups of 25 patients (total 50), who are of 60-90 years of age and are having either aortic valve surgery or the mentioned accompanied with cardiopulmonary bypass operation. The first group receives dexmedetomidine infusion and the other receives placebo infusion after the end of propofol infusion.

The specific goal of the study is to figure what haemodynamic - mostly blood pressure related - changes can be observed when the postoperatively cut propofol infusion is continued with dexmedetomidine over the extubation procedure.

Our hypothesis is that by using dexmedetomidine supplemented sedation the normally notifiable peak in blood pressure may be avoided.

The study will be carried out completely in Cardiac ICU in Tampere University Hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tampere, Finland, 33521
        • TAYS Sydänkeskus Oy (Heart Center CO. Tampere University Hospital)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has to be scheduled for aortic valve surgery OR previous AND coronary artery bypass
  • Patient has to be 60 to 90 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If a patient is unable to give informed concent to participate the study
  • If a patient is allergic or otherwise hypersensitive to the drug used in the study
  • If the patient has either insufficient kidney or insufficient liver function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Saline group
Difference from the normal protocol actualizes at the point when propofol infusion is cut off. From there on the patient in this group receives saline infusion up to the point where 15 minutes have passed after the extubation procedure.
Saline placebo infusion will be adjusted the same fashion as the active comparator drug.
Other Names:
  • Normal saline
  • Saline 0,9%
Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine group
Difference from the normal protocol happens when normally the propofol infusion is cut off. From there on the patient in this group receives dexmedetomidine infusion up to the point where 15 minutes have passed after the extubation procedure.
Dexmedetomidine will be diluted into a saline solution to a recommended concentration of 4 micrograms per millilitre. The saline will then be initially administered at the rate of 0.5 micrograms/kg/h and from that point the amount will be reduced to the point where the patient breathes well and is calm (compare dexmedetomidine recommendation at 0.2-1.4 ug/kg/h). The infusion rate will then be approximately 1-10 ml/h for a patient of 80 kgs weight. The exact dosage cannot be predetermined because it differs in each individual. In the control group the infusion speed is matching.
Other Names:
  • Dexdor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Highest value of systolic blood pressure during extubation period
Time Frame: Starting five minutes before the extubation, lasting up to 1.5 hours.
The values of this variable will be collected from the point when propofol infusion is cut. This data will be used to estimate the base level of SAP for further analysis within this study.
Starting five minutes before the extubation, lasting up to 1.5 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk index calculated from systolic blood pressure value and time spent in that value.
Time Frame: Starting at the point when propofol infusion is halted and lasting up to three hours after extubation.
With the risk index we are better able to assess the total risk of the high levels of blood pressure to the patient. The risk index is dependant on the time integral of the blood pressure, for which the zero-value may be calculated from average pre-extubation SAP level.
Starting at the point when propofol infusion is halted and lasting up to three hours after extubation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kati M Järvelä, MD PhD, TAYS Sydänkeskus Oy (Heart Center CO. Tampere University Hospital)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Saline (placebo)

3
Subscribe