Celiac Disease Screening

March 16, 2018 updated by: Daniel Leffler, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

A Prospective Trial of Celiac Disease Screening

The purpose of this study is to see if it makes sense to test people for celiac disease who have a first or second degree relative (parent, sibling, child, grandparent, aunt or uncle) with celiac disease. The investigators will check to see what differences there are in the health and quality of life between those who know they have celiac disease and start the gluten free diet and those who do not.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Our overall hypothesis is that first and second degree relatives of individuals with celiac disease benefit from screening and diagnosis of celiac disease. Secondary hypotheses are:

  1. The number needed to test and cost to benefit one person though celiac disease screening are within acceptable ranges of 33 tested and < $10,000 spent.
  2. Treatment does not lead to adverse metabolic changes.
  3. Intestinal biopsy is unnecessary for accurate diagnosis in a substantial subset of adults.

Aim 1. Determine the effect of screen detected celiac disease on health related quality of life.

  • Evaluate change in health related quality of life at one year in participants randomized to the screen detected, early diagnosis cohort compared to the screen detected, delayed diagnosis, clinically detected and non-celiac control cohorts.
  • Evaluate change in symptoms, psychological well-being and burden of treatment at one year in the screen detected, early diagnosis cohort compared to the screen detected, delayed diagnosis, clinically detected and non-celiac control cohorts.
  • Evaluate the cost per diagnosis and the number needed to test for the diagnosis of individuals who will have a clinically meaningful improvement in health related quality of life attributable to treatment of celiac disease.

Aim 2: Assess the effect of screen detected celiac disease on nutritional and metabolic indices.

  • Compare changes bone density, body mass index, Reynolds Cardiovascular Risk Score, and nutritional indices at one year in the screen detected, early diagnosis cohort compared to the screen detected, delayed diagnosis, clinically detected and non-celiac control cohorts.

Aim 3: Evaluate the reliability of using serologic tests in combination with intestinal fatty acid binding protein vs. intestinal biopsy to confirm celiac disease diagnosis in adults.

  • Prospectively assess the sensitivity and specificity of a novel non-invasive celiac diagnostic algorithm in comparison to the current gold standard of small intestinal biopsy histology.
  • Model the cost of modified, non-invasive celiac testing vs. classical testing with endoscopic biopsy in both screen-detected and clinically identified celiac disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be ambulatory, community dwelling, 18 to 80 years, inclusive
  • For the screening cohort:

    • Have a first or second degree family member with known biopsy-proven celiac disease.
    • Have not been on a gluten-free diet in the past 6 months
    • Have not received a prior diagnosis of celiac disease at any time
  • For the clinically detected cohort

    • Have biopsy proven celiac disease detected based on clinical symptoms and on a gluten free diet for less than 1 month.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For the screen detected cohort, have significantly severe symptoms (as judged by the investigator) at screening which preclude randomization;
  • Be on a gluten-free diet or have been on a gluten-free diet within the past 6 months.
  • Be pregnant or planning pregnancy in the study time period
  • Be taking corticosteroids or immunomodulators
  • Have a history of significant concomitant gastrointestinal disease or other comorbidity judged by the investigator to potentially interfere with study outcomes
  • Be unable or unwilling to cooperate with the study protocol
  • Have insufficient knowledge of English to complete study surveys

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: screen detected, early diagnosis cohort
Subjects will be informed they have celiac disease and will be started on the gluten free diet.
No Intervention: screen detected, delayed diagnosis cohort
Subjects will not be told they have celiac disease and will not start the gluten free diet.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in health related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
as measured by the EQ-5D
Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in celiac symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
as measured by the Celiac Symptom Index
Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
change in bone density
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
Baseline and 12 months
change in psychological well-being
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
as measured by the Psychological General Well-Being Index
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
change in burden of treatment
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
as measured by the disease burden visual analog scale
baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Leffler, MD, MS, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Celiac Disease

Clinical Trials on gluten free diet

3
Subscribe