- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02032511
Comparison of RAM Cannula Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Infant Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP)
January 5, 2017 updated by: Michelle Pape, University of Michigan
Comparison of RAM Cannula NCPAP Versus Infant Flow NCPAP
This study is designed to compare the effectiveness and ease of use of two commonly used NCPAP interfaces: the RAM NC and the Infant Flow prongs and nasal mask.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
19
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
No older than 6 months (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
infants less than or equal to 7kg with an order for nasal continuous positive pressure
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- less than or equal to 7 kg
- order for nasal continuous positive pressure
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients greater than 7kg
- patients that do not have informed consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
RAM Cannula Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
|
Infant Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Number of patients who achieve unassisted breathing
Time Frame: One year
|
One year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 9, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
January 10, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 9, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 5, 2017
Last Verified
January 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUM00073557
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prematurity
-
Stanford UniversityMedtronic - MITGCompletedIntraventricular Hemorrhage of Prematurity | Complications of PrematurityUnited States
-
Universidade Federal do MaranhãoConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoUnknown
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)CompletedExtreme PrematurityUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamRecruitingPrematurity; ExtremeUnited States
-
Stockholm UniversityKarolinska Institutet; Region Stockholm; Centrum för kompetensutveckling inom... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
Guilherme Sant'Anna, MDCompleted
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompletedComplication of PrematurityUnited States
-
Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education...UnknownPrematurity of FetusTurkey
-
Nantes University HospitalActive, not recruitingPrematurity of FetusFrance