Comparison of Ferrous Sulfate, Polymaltose Complex and Iron-zinc in Iron Deficiency Anemia

February 28, 2014 updated by: Yasemin Ozsurekci, Hacettepe University
The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of the different oral iron preparations in children with IDA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Iron deficiency (ID) is the most common cause of the anemia throughout the world, with almost half of the population in developing countries suffering from ID. Children with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) may have functional consequences including impaired motor and physical growth. In the case of IDA, the underlying cause should be identified and treated. Iron supplementation remains an important strategy for the prevention and treatment of IDA and can produce substantial improvements in the functional performance of iron deficient individuals.

The iron-containing preparations available on the market vary widely in dosage, salt, and chemical state of iron (ferrous or ferric form). Current treatment strategy for IDA involves the oral use of Fe2+ salts (Fe SO4) and Fe3+ polymaltose complexes (FeOH3). Most of these preparations vary in their bioavailability, efficacy, side effects, and cost. Animal studies have not shown any significant difference in their oral bioavailability. However, in clinical practice, bivalent iron salts such as ferrous sulfate (Fe-S), ferrous gluconate, and ferrous fumarate are more widely used and are preferred over ferric iron preparations. Fe-S preparations usually present good bioavailability (between 10 and 15 %), while bioavailability of ferric iron preparations is 3 to 4 times less than that of conventional Fe-S. This is due to the extremely poor solubility of ferric iron in alkaline media and the fact that ferric iron needs to be transformed into ferrous iron before being absorbed. For this reason, among ferrous preparations, Fe-S remains the established and the standard treatment of ID due to its acceptable tolerability, high effectiveness, and low cost. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of the different oral iron preparations in children with IDA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ankara/Sihhiye
      • Ankara, Ankara/Sihhiye, Turkey, 06100
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 months to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The children with IDA, aged between 6 months and 15 years, were randomly included in Fe-S (Ferro Sanol® sp.)(Group I), Fe-OH-PM (Santafer® sp.)(Group II), and Fe-Zn (Ferro Zinc® sp.)(Group III). IDA was defined as hemoglobin (Hgb), serum iron and ferritin levels below -2SD according to age and gender.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The main exclusion criteria were anemia due to other causes except IDA
  • Severe concurrent illness (cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic)
  • Known hypersensitivity to ferrous or ferric preparations
  • Malignancy of any type
  • Children with thalassemia major, sickle cell anemia or other hemoglobinopathies, hemolytic anemia or aplastic or hypoplastic anemia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fe-OH-PM (Santafer® sp.)(Group II)
The patients in Group II were treated with Fe-OH-PM (Santafer® sp.), 6 mg/kg/day orally.
The children with IDA that included in Fe-OH-PM (Santafer® sp.)(Group II) were treated with a therapeutic dose Santafer® as 6 mg/kg/day in the first 2 months and followed by maintenance treatment at a dosage of 2 mg/kg/day for the next 2 months.
Other Names:
  • Fe-OH-PM (Santafer® sp.)(Group II)
Experimental: Fe-Zn (Ferro Zinc® sp.)(Group III)
The patients in Group III were treated with Fe-Zn (Ferro Zinc® sp.), 6 mg/kg/day orally
The children with IDA that included in Fe-Zn (Ferro Zinc® sp.)(Group III) were treated with a therapeutic dose Ferro Zinc® sp. as 6 mg/kg/day in the first 2 months and followed by maintenance treatment at a dosage of 2 mg/kg/day for the next 2 months.
Other Names:
  • Fe-Zn (Ferro Zinc® sp.)(Group III)
Experimental: Fe-S (Ferro Sanol® sp.)(Group I)
The patients in Group I were treated with Ferro Sanol® sp., 6 mg/kg/day orally
The children with IDA that included in Fe-S (Ferro Sanol® sp.)(Group I) were treated with a therapeutic dose Ferro Sanol® sp as 6 mg/kg/day in the first 2 months and followed by maintenance treatment at a dosage of 2 mg/kg/day for the next 2 months.
Other Names:
  • Fe-S (Ferro Sanol® sp)(Group I)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Hb levels at 2 months
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Iron levels at 2 months.
Time Frame: 2 Months
2 Months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvements of the symptoms
Time Frame: 2 Months
2 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yasemin Ozsurekci, MD, Hacettepe University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Iron Deficiency Anemia

Clinical Trials on Santafer® sp.

3
Subscribe