Effect of Levodopa on Postural Motor Learning in Parkinson Disease

January 4, 2017 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

The primary goal of this project is to gain a better understanding of whether and how levodopa (a common anti-Parkinson disease medication) alters postural motor learning in people with Parkinson disease. A secondary goal is to assess whether motor cortical excitability, measured via Transcranial magnetic stimulation, is related to postural motor learning.

Participants with Parkinson disease will complete between 50 and 100 postural perturbations (via support surface translations), ON and OFF their dopamine replacement therapy (i.e. levodopa). Adaptation of responses to these perturbations will be tracked. Participants will also undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation to capture cortical excitability of the brain (in particular the motor cortex). Cortical excitability will be correlated to adaptation of stepping (i.e. postural motor learning) ON and OFF levodopa. Investigators will also capture postural motor learning and cortical excitability in age-matched healthy adults.

Investigators hypothesize that dopamine will have a negative effect on postural motor learning, and the cortical excitability will be correlated to postural motor learning.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97210
        • Oregon Health & Science University
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84148
        • VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals with Parkinson Disease or age-matched healthy adults in the north west United States (Oregon and Washington state).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18 and 90 years of age.
  • Individuals with Parkinson Disease
  • Healthy adults age-matched to PD participants
  • Participants with PD will be currently taking dopamine replacement (i.e. Levodopa)

Exclusion Criteria:

All subjects exclusion criteria:

  • Deep brain stimulation
  • Recent (within 6 months) orthopedic injuries influencing standing or balance
  • Inability to stand independently

Transcranial magnetic stimulation exclusion criteria (for the subset of individuals taking part in the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation portion of the study):

  • History of epilepsy or currently taking any epileptic medication,
  • History of seizures
  • Family history of epilepsy or seizures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Parkinsons disease
Individuals with Parkinsons disease
Participants will undergo between 50 and 100 postural perturbations (quick movements of the support surface) in multiple directions. These perturbations will be between 9 and 24cm, and between 18 and 56 cm/s depending on participant tolerance.
Control
Age-matched healthy adults
Participants will undergo between 50 and 100 postural perturbations (quick movements of the support surface) in multiple directions. These perturbations will be between 9 and 24cm, and between 18 and 56 cm/s depending on participant tolerance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Movement of Center of Mass (COM) After Postural Perturbation
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication
Investigators will assess (via automated and custom Matlab software) the magnitude of COM movement after a postural perturbation is delivered via motion of the support surface. This will be measured throughout the intervention, as well as at follow up (24 hour later).
Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication
Change in Steps After Postural Perturbation
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication
Investigators will assess (via automated and custom Matlab software) the number of steps taken after a postural perturbation is delivered via motion of the support surface. This will be measured throughout the intervention, as well as at follow up (24 hour later).
Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in First Step Length
Time Frame: Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication
Investigators will assess (via automated and custom Matlab software) the length of the first step after a postural perturbation is delivered via motion of the support surface. This will be measured throughout the intervention, as well as at follow up (24 hour later).
Baseline and follow up (24 hours later) both ON and OFF antiparkinson medication
Cortical Excitability
Time Frame: TMS data was collected ON and OFF medication during one visit. This visit occurred within 3 weeks of the initial postural control assessments.
Investigators will assess the cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex in a subset of participants both ON and OFF levodopa. Specifically, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to stimulate the motor cortex, where we measure muscular activity of the arm (i.e. motor evoked potentials; MEPs). The primary outcome variable noted below is the lowest stimulation setting (measured as a percentage) which results in an MEP in 5 of 10 trials.
TMS data was collected ON and OFF medication during one visit. This visit occurred within 3 weeks of the initial postural control assessments.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel S Peterson, PhD MS BS, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Postural perturbation

3
Subscribe