Oral Piroxicam Versus Buccal Fentanyl in Breakthrough Pain

May 11, 2016 updated by: Ayman Abd Al-maksoud Yousef, Tanta University

The Analgesic Efficacy of Oral Piroxicam Versus Buccal Fentanyl in Cancer Breakthrough Pain in Patients With Bone Metastases

100 patients with Breakthrough pain will be allocated to receive either oral prioxicam (OP) (n=50) or sublingual fentanyl (SLF) (n=50) . Patients will be divided randomly into two equal groups: oral prioxicam (OP) Group and sublingual fentanyl citrate (SLF) Group, comprising of 50 patients each.

Pain intensity level on a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS), patients will be instructed about the use of a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain). frequency of Breakthrough pain throughout the day, onset of relief (0-5, 6-10, 11-15, or over 16 min), time required for dose titration, patient satisfaction and adverse effects were assessed at 3, 7, 15, and 30 days after starting the treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this prospective, longitudinal, controlled-study, 100 patients with Breakthrough pain will be allocated to receive either oral prioxicam (OP) (n=50) or sublingual fentanyl (SLF) (n=50) . Patients will be divided randomly into two equal groups: oral prioxicam (OP) Group and sublingual fentanyl citrate (SLF) Group, comprising of 30 patients each.

Eligible participants were all adults aged 18 or over suffering from Background pain cancer pain whose cancer pain was treated with strong opioids and who had breakthrough pain which met the criteria described by Portenoy.(5) (stable analgesia in the previous 48 h, controlled background pain in the previous 24 h, transient exacerbation of pain in the previous 24 h). The term strong opioid refers to medicines classified as being on step three of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder. In Egypt the strong opioids available include fentanyl, morphine and hydromorphone.

Exclusion criteria were less than18 years old, non-controlled basal pain, hospitalized patients, or cognitive disturbances, patients with contraindication to NSAIDS such as gastric ulcer, impaired renal function, cerebrovascular accident, Coronary artery bypass graft , Uncontrolled hypertension, patients with coagulation anomalies such as hepatic disease or patients a previous history of allergy to NSAID.

Randomization will be performed by random numbers using sealed envelopes without sex stratification. Sealed envelopes indicate the group of assignment. An independent anesthesiologist, who did not participate in the study or data collection, will read the number contained in the envelope and made group assignments. Patients will be blindly randomized to the two groups; the process of inclusion into the study will go on until the requested number of patients will be reached.

Pain intensity level on a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS), patients will be instructed about the use of a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain). frequency of Breakthrough pain throughout the day, onset of relief (0-5, 6-10, 11-15, or over 16 min), time required for dose titration, patient satisfaction and adverse effects were assessed at 3, 7, 15, and 30 days after starting the treatment.

The primary outcome is the degree of breakthrough pain score using VAS in the two groups. The secondary outcomes measures are analgesic requirement, patients satisfaction, and identification of undesirable effects that may be associated with the use of both drugs in patients with breakthrough pain in both groups. All adverse events related to surgery and the regional anesthetic technique will be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Eligible participants were all:

  • adults aged 18 or over
  • suffering from Background pain cancer pain
  • whose cancer pain was treated with strong opioids and
  • who had breakthrough pain which met the criteria described by Portenoy.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria were:

  • less than18 years old,
  • non-controlled basal pain,
  • hospitalized patients, or cognitive disturbances,
  • patients with contraindication to NSAIDS such as:

    • gastric ulcer,
    • impaired renal function,
    • cerebrovascular accident,
    • coronary artery bypass graft,
    • uncontrolled hypertension,
    • patients with coagulation anomalies such as hepatic disease or
    • patients a previous history of allergy to NSAID.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: oral perixicam
50 patients with Breakthrough pain will receive oral prioxicam for treament of breakthrough pain.
Oral adminstration of buccal perixicam
Other Names:
  • feldene flash
No Intervention: oral fentanyl
50 patients with Breakthrough pain will receive sublingual fentanyl for treament of breakthrough pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
analgesic scale (assessmet of VAS immeditally after analgesic adminstration)
Time Frame: two hours
assessmet of VAS immeditally after analgesic adminstration
two hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ayman A Yousef, Assistant professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasm Metastases

Clinical Trials on oral perixicam

3
Subscribe