The Efficacy and Safety of Combined Therapy With Red Yeast Rice and Low-dose Statin:Comparing With Standardized Statin

July 19, 2021 updated by: Kangting Ji, MD, Wenzhou Medical University

Comparison Between Combined Therapy With Red Yeast Rice and Low-dose Statin and Standardized Statin: a Single-center, Non-inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial

Double-dose statin regimen achieves merely 6% of decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, whereas the risk of side effects increased largely. The investigators' previous pilot study (NCT01686451) has suggested that red yeast rice was of similar lipid-lowering efficacy while was associated with less fatigue than statins. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with red yeast rice and low-dose atorvastatin in persons with mild atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and who qualified for statin therapy according to national guidelines.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Both Red Yeast Rice and Statins are cholesterol-lowering medications are often prescribed for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The investigators' previous pilot study (NCT01686451) has suggested that red yeast rice was of similar lipid-lowering efficacy while was associated with less fatigue than statins. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with red yeast rice at 1.2 g/day and atorvastatin at 10 mg/day with atorvastatin at 20 mg/day in persons with mild atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and who qualified for statin therapy according to national guidelines.

This study will enroll individuals with established mild atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and who do not currently take lipid-lowering medications. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive combined therapy with red yeast rice at 1.2 g/day and atorvastatin at 10 mg/day or atorvastatin at 20 mg/day for 24 weeks. Study visits will occur at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24. Blood will be collected for laboratory testing, and standardized questionnaires will assess noncardiovascular endpoints. Pill count will be used to assess adherence of treatment. Medication side effects will be monitored and tests of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransaminase (AST) and creatine phosphate kinase (CPK) will be performed. Medication efficacy will be assessed and test of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

240

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325000
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Hispital of Wenzhou Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with established mild atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, defined as coronary and/or carotid and/or peripheral artery lesions <40% lumen diameter stenosis, diagnosed by coronary angiography and carotid and/or peripheral artery ultrasound respectively, together with LDL cholesterol level > 70 mg/dL (1.80 mmol/L).
  2. Female patients must be postmenopausal as defined by no menstruation for at least 12 months, or surgically sterilized for at least three months prior to beginning the study, or have a negative pregnancy test and agree to avoid pregnancy during the study and one month after the end of the study by using two reliable methods of contraception.
  3. Patients must have been informed of all aspects of the study and signed an informed consent form before any study-related activities.
  4. Patients must be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who have met all the above inclusion criteria will be screened for the following exclusion criteria.

  1. Patients who have been taken lipid-lowering medications including statins or red yeast rice products during the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
  2. Documented history of myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina leading to hospitalization, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), carotid surgery or stenting, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, endovascular procedure or surgical intervention for peripheral vascular disease.
  3. Planned to undergo scheduled PCI, CABG, carotid or peripheral revascularization during the study.
  4. History of New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure within the past 12 months.
  5. Known history of hemorrhagic stroke.
  6. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension at the screening visit. Patients on stable antihypertensive medication may be enrolled provided that the medications and dosage remain stable throughout the study.
  7. Cardiovascular surgery or major operations within 6 months prior to screening visit.
  8. Patients who are taking anticoagulants except aspirin at < 325 mg/day.
  9. Patients with liver dysfunction as indicated by a serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level of > 1.5-times of upper limit of normal (ULN) range, or clinical symptoms.
  10. Patients with elevated creatine phosphokinase level (above Upper Limit of Normal range).
  11. Patients with renal dysfunction as indicated by a serum creatinine level above ULN range, or clinical symptoms.
  12. Patients with gastric or peptic ulcer within 3 months prior to screening visit.
  13. Patients with medical history of hypothyroidism, pancreatitis, cholestasis, nephrotic syndrome, gall bladder disease, or primary biliary cirrhosis. Patients on thyroid replacement therapy at stable doses may be enrolled if clinically euthyroid.
  14. Patients with clinically relevant illness within 4 weeks prior to screening visit that may interfere with the conduct of this study.
  15. Patients with a history of alcohol or narcotic substance abuse within two years prior to screening visit.
  16. Patients with hypersensitivity to lipid-lowering agents.
  17. Patients who have taken another investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to screening visit.
  18. Patients with uncontrolled metabolic or endocrine disease knowing to influence lipid values.
  19. Patients who are known to be HIV positive.
  20. Patients who have a history or presence of active malignancy (other than non-melanoma skin cancer) or clinically significant psychiatric, neurological, respiratory, hematological, or other conditions that in the opinion of investigators might interfere with or contraindicate participation of the patients in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Red yeast rice and atorvastatin
Participants will receive 4 identically appearing capsules twice daily for 24 weeks: 2 300mg of red yeast rice and 2 10mg of atorvastatin.
Participants will receive 2 capsules of 300mg red yeast rice and 2 capsules of 10mg atorvastatin for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Xuezhikang; Lipitor
Active Comparator: Atorvastatin alone
Participants will receive 4 identically appearing capsules twice daily for 24 weeks: 2 placebo and 2 10mg of atorvastatin.
Participants will receive 2 capsules of placebo and 2 capsules of 10mg atorvastatin for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Lipitor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level
Time Frame: Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment on serum total cholesterol (TC) level
Time Frame: Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level
Time Frame: Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum triglyceride (TG) level
Time Frame: Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum non-HDL cholesterol level
Time Frame: Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Measured at screening, baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMs)
Time Frame: Measured at week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
SAMs included all muscle-related complaints (e.g. pain, weakness, or cramps). Reported events are muscle-related complaints confirmed by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) according to the nature of the muscle symptoms, the elevation in creatine kinase (CK) levels and their temporal association with statin initiation, discontinuation, and re-challenge.
Measured at week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum fasting blood glucose level
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on serum glycosylated hemoglobin level
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Physical Activity Level
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Physical activity level will be estimated by short version of international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ).
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on fatigue scores
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Fatigue score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Memory problems score
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Memory problems score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Attention/concentration problems score
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Attention/concentration problems score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Calculation problems score
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Calculation problems score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Depression/hopelessness score
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Depression/hopelessness score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Anxiety score
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Anxiety included restless, impatience, irritability, nervous, anxious. Anxiety score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Mean percentage change from baseline at week 24 (or the last assessment) on Sleep problems score
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Sleep problems score is self-rated, ranging from 0-10. For the severity scale, 0=not present, 10=most severe.
Measured at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24
Safety will be assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs), discontinuation due to the AEs, clinically relevant changes on laboratory test results, vital signs, physical examinations, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG).
Time Frame: Screening, Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, week 16, and week 24
ECG and Physical exam only at Screening and Week 24
Screening, Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, week 16, and week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kangting Ji, MD, The Second Hispital of Wenzhou Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atherosclerosis

Clinical Trials on Red yeast rice and atorvastatin

3
Subscribe