Nab-Paclitaxel in Combination With Carboplatin as First-line Therapy in Patients With NSCLC (NEPTUN)

October 5, 2021 updated by: iOMEDICO AG

A Non-interventional Study of Nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane®) in Combination With Carboplatin as First Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NEPTUN)

This is a single-arm non-interventional study (NIS) to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving the combination of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin as first line palliative therapy in a real life setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The present NIS is designed to provide additional knowledge in terms of effectiveness, safety and quality of life in routine administration of the combination of nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane®) and carboplatin as first line treatment for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are not candidates for potentially curative surgery and / or radiation therapy. The combination of Abraxane® and carboplatin has been approved in Europe in March 2015 based on results from a pivotal randomized, open label phase III study with 1,052 patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

408

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 79106
        • iOMEDICO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with locally advanced / metastatic NSCLC who are not candidates for potentially curative surgery and / or radiation therapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced / metastatic, unresectable NSCLC
  • According to SmPC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • According to SmPC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS) rate
Time Frame: After 6-months
Effectiveness in terms of PFS will be assessed and evaluated according to local medical standards from screening until end of treatment observation (6 months). Additional survival and and if applicable clinical PFS will be followed up for 24 months post-treatment observation.
After 6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: After 6-months
Effectiveness in terms of OS will be assessed and evaluated according to local medical standards from screening until end of treatment observation (6 months).
After 6-months
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: After 6-months
Effectiveness in terms of ORR will be assessed and evaluated according to local medical standards from screening until end of treatment observation (6 months).
After 6-months
Safety - Adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 9 months
Safety assessments will consist of monitoring of all AEs, including serious adverse events, and monitoring of laboratory values. AEs will be graded according to CTCAE V4.03. Supportive therapies will be documented.
through study completion, an average of 9 months
Patient-reported outcomes on Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, every 3 months throughout study completion, an average of 9 months
Questionnaires: EQ5D-5L and FACT-L
Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, every 3 months throughout study completion, an average of 9 months
Rationale for physicians' treatment decision
Time Frame: Baseline
Rationale for physicians' treatment decision, assessed with a therapy-decision questionnaire
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tobias Dechow, Prof. Dr., Oncology Ravensburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 29, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 6, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Clinical Trials on Nab-Paclitaxel

3
Subscribe