Assessment of New Molecular Imaging Strategies for Prostate Cancer (MISTER)

December 20, 2021 updated by: Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)

Assessment of New Molecular Imaging Strategies for Prostate Cancer: Predictive Value of Established and Novel Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Radiotracers in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

In this study 30 men, with advanced metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) planned to have hormonal treatment, will undergo conventional imaging and functional imaging prior to treatment and post treatment to determine if changes in imaging results will be prognostic of outcome. Patients will have a clinical follow-up every 3 months post randomization for one year and followed for survival at Years 2 and 3.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this study 30 men, with advanced metastatic CRPC intended to have abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide hormonal treatment will undergo conventional imaging including a 99mTc-Methyl diphosphonate (MDP) bone scan and Computed Tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis, and functional imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT and 2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl)-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (18F-DCFPyL) PET-CT one to four weeks prior to hormonal treatment and approximately 10 weeks post hormonal treatment.

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) will also be obtained at baseline and every three months in the first year. Baseline imaging of disease and changes between baseline and follow-up imaging on 18F-FDG PET-CT and 18F-DCFPyL PET-CT will be compared with standard of care imaging (99mTc-MDP bone scan and CT of the abdomen/pelvis) as well as with clinical evaluation including response to therapy and progression of disease.

This information could be used by clinicians to guide androgen receptor (AR) - targeted therapy. Patients will have a clinical follow-up every 3 months post randomization for one year and will be followed for survival at Years 2 and 3.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre
      • London, Ontario, Canada
        • London Health Sciences Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Sunnybrook-Odette Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Objectively documented metastatic prostate cancer progression with either of the following:

    • At least one rising PSA over a minimum of one week interval within six weeks of study registration, or
    • Radiographic progression in soft tissue and/or bone within six weeks of study registration
  2. Ongoing androgen deprivation therapy with serum testosterone <50 ng/dL (<1.7 nmol/L).
  3. Planned to start abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age < 18 years.
  2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2.
  3. Planned to receive palliative radiotherapy within the next 12 weeks.
  4. Hemoglobin < 90 g/L independent of transfusion.
  5. Platelet count < 50 x 10^9 / L.
  6. Serum albumin < 30 g/L.
  7. Serum creatinine > 1.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) or a calculated creatinine clearance <30 L/min.
  8. Contraindications to FDG.
  9. Inability to lie supine for imaging with PET-CT.
  10. Inability to undergo CT due to known allergy to contrast.
  11. Inadequate hepatic function: (i) Bilirubin >1.5 x ULN, and (ii) Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) >3 x ULN
  12. Inability to complete the study or required follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Imaging
Molecular Imaging
Baseline and follow-up FDG PET-CT and DCFPyL PET-CT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional imaging metabolic response contrasted with conventional imaging response
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Percent change of the average maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of target lesions in contrast with conventional imaging soft tissue and bone response between the baseline scans and the Week 10 scans.
10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional imaging response
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The percent change in the SUVmax of the most intensely FDG/DCFPyL avid lesion relative to Baseline.
10 weeks
Radiological progression free survival.
Time Frame: 3 years
The time from registration to the first date of radiographic disease progression in bone or soft tissue or to the date of death
3 years
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response
Time Frame: 3 years
The time from registration to the date of PSA progression
3 years
Progressive Disease (example change in treatment, skeletal related event)
Time Frame: 3 years
The time from registration to initiation of anti-cancer intervention or death from any cause.
3 years
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 3 years
The time from registration to the date of death from any cause.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katherine Zukotynski, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
  • Principal Investigator: Eric Winquist, London Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 24, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Molecular Imaging

3
Subscribe