Effect of Tiotropium + Olodaterol on Breathlessness in COPD Patients

August 21, 2019 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

A Randomised, Double-blind, Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Effect of 6 Weeks Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (5/5 µg) Compared With Tiotropium (5 µg), Both Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, on Breathlessness During the Three Minute Constant Speed Shuttle Test (3min CSST) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). [OTIVATO TM]

The primary objective of the present study is to evaluate the effect of tiotropium + olodaterol fixed dose combination (FDC) compared to tiotropium monotherapy on the intensity of breathlessness during the 3min constant speed shuttle test (CSST).

A secondary objective is to explore the relationship between reductions in breathlessness during the 3min CSST and reductions in breathlessness during activities of everyday living as measured by the dyspnea domain of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) following bronchodilator therapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

106

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Genk, Belgium, 3600
        • Genk - PRAC Janssens, E.
      • Hasselt, Belgium, 3500
        • Hasselt - PRAC Aumann, J-L
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven
      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • IUCPQ (Laval University)
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5
        • McMaster Univ. Medical Centre
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V7
        • Kingston General Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1
        • McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)
      • Berlin, Germany, 10787
        • Klinische Forschung Berlin GbR
      • Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 60596
        • IKF Pneumologie GmbH & Co. KG
      • Großhansdorf, Germany, 22927
        • Pneumologisches Forschungsinstitut an der LungenClinic Grosshansdorf GmbH
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands, 5623 EJ
        • Catharina Ziekenhuis
      • Heerlen, Netherlands, 6419 PC
        • Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
      • Zutphen, Netherlands, 7207 AE
        • Gelre Ziekenhuis Zutphen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients must sign an informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines prior to participation in the trial, including medication washout and restrictions
  • Diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and relatively stable airway obstruction: post bronchodilator 30%<= Forced Expiratory Volume in 1st second (FEV1)<80% of predicted normal (European Coal and Steel Community) and a post bronchodilator FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity<0.70 at visit 1
  • Male or female patients >=40 and =<75 years of age on day of signing consent.
  • Current or ex-smokers with a smoking history > 10 pack-years. Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded.
  • Baseline Dyspnea Index score< 8 at visit 0.
  • Hyperinflation at rest, defined as Functional Residual Capacity > 120% predicted at visit 1.
  • Borg dyspnea score >=4 at the end of 3min Constant Speed Shuttle Test at visit 2
  • Perform technically acceptable pulmonary function tests (spirometry and body plethysmography) and complete multiple shuttle tests during the study period
  • Inhale medication in a competent manner from the Respimat® inhaler and from a metered dose inhaler

Exclusion criteria:

  • Significant disease other than Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD); a significant disease which, in the investigator's opinion, may (i) put the patient at risk (ii) influence the study results or (iii) cause concern regarding the patient's ability to participate
  • Clinically relevant abnormal baseline haematology, blood chemistry, in the investigator's opinion, or creatinine >x2 Upper Limit Normal will be excluded regardless of clinical condition
  • Current documented diagnosis of asthma
  • COPD exacerbation in the 6 weeks prior to screening
  • Diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis
  • History of myocardial infarction within 6 months of screening
  • Life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia (investigator judgment)
  • Known active tuberculosis
  • Any malignancy unless free of disease for at least 5 years (treated basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell skin cancers are allowed)
  • History of cystic fibrosis
  • Clinically relevant bronchiectasis (investigator judgment)
  • Severe emphysema requiring endobronchial interventions within 6 months prior to screening
  • History of significant alcohol or drug abuse (investigator judgment)
  • Any contraindications for exercise testing
  • Patients who have undergone thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
  • Treatment with any oral or patch ß-adrenergics
  • Treatment with oral corticosteroid medication at unstable doses or at doses in excess of the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone per day or 20 mg every other day
  • Treatment with antibiotics for any reason within 4 weeks of screening
  • Patients being treated with Phosphodiesterase Type 4 (PDE4) inhibitors within 3 months of screening visit should not be enrolled and PDE4 inhibitors should not be withdrawn for the purpose of enrolling in this study
  • Regular use of daytime oxygen therapy for >1 hour per day and in the investigator's opinion will be unable to abstain from use during clinic visits
  • Completion of a pulmonary rehabilitation program 6 weeks prior to screening or currently in a program
  • Limitation of exercise performance as a result of factors other than fatigue or exertional dyspnea, such as arthritis in the leg, angina pectoris, claudication, morbid obesity
  • Endurance time >=12 minutes during the incremental shuttle walk test
  • Oxygen saturation < 85% (on room air) at rest or during exercise.
  • Taken an investigational drug within 1 month or 6 half-lives or in case the investigational drug class is listed within the washout period specified prior to screening visit
  • Known hypersensitivity to ß-adrenergics and/or anticholinergic drugs, Benzalkonium Chloride, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid or any other component of the Respimat® inhalation solution
  • Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial
  • Women of childbearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control
  • Previously been randomized in this study or are currently participating in another study
  • Unable to comply with pulmonary medication restrictions prior to randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tiotropium
fixed dose combination once daily
Experimental: Tiotropium + Olodaterol
Patients will receive tiotropium 5mcg + olodaterol 5mcg in a fixed dose combination once daily.
fixed dose combination once daily
fixed dose combination once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Intensity of Breathlessness Measured Using the Modified Borg Scale at the End of the 3 Minute (Min) Constant Speed Shuttle Test After 6 Weeks of Treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
At 3 min or end of exercise (if 3 min not achieved), patients were asked to estimate the intensity of breathing discomfort that they were experiencing by matching their subjective estimate to descriptive phrases that best described the intensity of each sensation using the Modified Borg Scale (MBS-S). The modified Borg scale is 10-point subjective scoring system, in which a patient rates effort of exertion while performing a particular activity. The scale is 0 to 10, the higher the score, the greater the perceived difficulty. Measure type is actually Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline.
Baseline and week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment for Inspiratory Capacity Measured Prior to Exercise
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
Inspiratory Capacity (IC) is a standard measurement for the assessment of lung function. IC measurements were performed prior to the 3min Constant Speed Shuttle Test (CSST) (at rest). Measure type is actually Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline.
Baseline and week 6
Change From Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment for Inspiratory Capacity Measured at the End of Exercise
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
Inspiratory Capacity (IC) is a standard measurement for the assessment of lung function. IC measurements were performed at the end of the 3min Constant Speed Shuttle Test (CSST). Measure type is actually Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline.
Baseline and week 6
Change From Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment for 1 Hour Post-dose Forced Expiratory Volume
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1st second (FEV1) is a standard measurement for the assessment of lung function. The best of 3 efforts was defined as the highest FEV1, each obtained on any of 3 manoeuvres meeting the American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria (to a maximum of 5 attempts). Measure type is actually Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline.
Baseline and week 6
Change From Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment for 1 Hour Post-dose Forced Vital Capacity
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is a standard measurement for the assessment of lung function. The best of 3 efforts was defined as the highest FVC, each obtained on any of 3 manoeuvres meeting the American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria (to a maximum of 5 attempts). Measure type is actually Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline.
Baseline and week 6
Change From Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment for Intensity of Breathlessness (MBS-S) at 1, 2 and 2.5 Minute (Min) During the 3 Min Constant Speed Shuttle Test
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
At 1, 2 and 2.5 min during exercise, patients were asked to estimate the intensity of breathing discomfort that they were experiencing by matching their subjective estimate to descriptive phrases that best described the intensity of each sensation using the Modified Borg Scale (MBS-S). At 3 min or end of exercise (if 3 min not achieved), patients were asked to estimate the intensity of breathing discomfort that they were experiencing by matching their subjective estimate to descriptive phrases that best described the intensity of each sensation using the Modified Borg Scale (MBS-S). The modified Borg scale is 10-point subjective scoring system, in which a patient rates effort of exertion while performing a particular activity. The scale is 0 to 10, the higher the score, the greater the perceived difficulty. Measure type is actually Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline.
Baseline and week 6
Change From Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment for Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire - Self Administered Individualized (CRQ-SAI) Dyspnoea Domain Score
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
CRQ-SAI refers to the CRQ-Self-administered individualized format as it contains a dyspnea domain that is individualized to each patient. This version was derived from the original CRQ tool & therefore, is scored on 7-point Likert-type scale (1: maximum impairment to 7: no impairment) for each 4 domains covering: dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function & mastery. Dyspnea items may be selected from list of 26 suggested items or written in by the patients. The patients are asked to select up to 5 activities associated with breathlessness that they perform frequently and are most important to them. The scores for each question of each domain were added together and divided by the number of questions answered in each domain. The higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life in the respective domain. Measure type is actually Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline.
Baseline and week 6
Change From Baseline After 6 Weeks of Treatment for Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire - Self Administered Standardized (CRQ-SAS) Dyspnoea Domain Score
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
CRQ-SAS was questionnaire to assess patients' perception of COPD and measures the impact of COPD on their life. This version was derived from the original CRQ tool & therefore, is scored on 7-point Likert-type scale (1: maximum impairment to 7: no impairment) for each 4 domains covering: dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function & mastery. The CRQ-SAS refers to the CRQ-Self-administered standardized format & contains 20 questions. The first part of the questionnaire contains 5 standardized dyspnea questions and the patients must indicate how much shortness of breath they have experienced while performing each of these 5 activities. The scores for each question of each domain were added together and divided by the number of questions answered in each domain. The higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life in the respective domain. Measure type is actually Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline.
Baseline and week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 22, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on Tiotropium

3
Subscribe