Wheezing Diagnosis Using a Smartphone (WheezSmart)

February 3, 2023 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Wheezing Diagnosis Using a Smartphone in Infants Referred for Bronchiolitis

Abnormal respiratory sounds (wheezing and/or crackles) are diagnosis criteria of acute bronchiolitis. One third of these infants will develop recurrent episodes, leading to the diagnosis of infant asthma. Nowadays, no available treatment shortens the course of bronchiolitis or hastens the resolution of symptoms, thus, therapy is supportive. Our hypothesis is that the diagnosis of wheezing during bronchiolitis (~60% of infants) will help to select infants who will benefit from anti-asthma therapy. In this setting the diagnosis of wheezing is crucial, and an objective tool for recognition of wheezing is of clinical value. The investigators developed a wheezing recognition algorithm from recorded respiratory sounds with a Smartphone placed near the mouth (Bokov P, Comput Biol Med, 2016). The objectives of the present cross sectional, observational study are 1/ to further validate our approach in a larger sample of infants (1 to 24 months) admitted to hospital for a respiratory complaint during the period of viral bronchiolitis, and 2/ to use gold standard diagnosis of wheezing by respiratory sound recording (Littmann) and subsequent analysis by two experienced pediatricians.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Infants (1 to 24 months old) are recruited in two emergency departments (Robert Debré; Antoine Béclère hospitals of Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris) based on a respiratory complaint. Six characteristics are recorded (age, sex, SpO2, presence or absence of wheezing, other respiratory sound, initial diagnosis). Two recordings of respiratory sounds are obtained almost simultaneously: one with a Smartphone at the mouth (5 cm) and one with an electronic stetoscope (Littmann). Two expert pediatricians listen the recordings giving thee groups: with wheezing (agreement), without wheezing (agreement) and non agreement diagnosis. The recordings made with the Smartphone are subjected to the wheezing recognition algorithm as previously described. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPP are then evaluated. The algorithm will further be improved if necessary using the true negative and true positive recordings (those with expert agreement).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Hôpital Robert Debré; service de Physiologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 month to 2 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Infant selected in the emergency department: respiratory complaint

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • infant 1 to 24 months old
  • respiratory complaint in the emergency room

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
positive and negative predictive values of the algorithm for wheezing diagnosis
Time Frame: 8 months
8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sensibility and specificity of the algorithm in subgroups
Time Frame: 8 months
The sensibility and specificity of the algorithm will be assessed for recordings with other respiratory sounds (crackles for instance) The agreement (kappa value) between the emergency room sound diagnosis and both the expert and algorithm diagnosis (diagnostic ability of the physician in the emergency room)
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bronchiolitis

3
Subscribe