Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain Injured Patients (INTREPID)

August 25, 2023 updated by: C. R. Bard
This study will assess the impact of fever prevention on fever burden and short- and long-term neurologic outcomes in brain injured patients. Half of the subjects will undergo fever prevention using a targeted temperature management system and half of the subjects will be treated for fever should it develop.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multiple studies demonstrate that fever / elevated temperature is associated with poor outcomes in brain injured patients; however, there are no conclusive studies that demonstrate that fever prevention/controlled normothermia is associated with better outcomes. This study will be conducted to assess the impact of advanced temperature control to prevent fever in brain injured patients. The fever prevention group will use the Arctic Sun Temperature Management System and will be compared to standard care patients in whom fever may spontaneously develop. If fever develops in a patient in the standard care group, they will be treated with standard fever care measures according to a step-wise algorithm, consisting primarily of intermittent antipyretics (e.g., acetaminophen) and cooling blankets and, when necessary, advanced targeted temperature management devices.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

686

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
        • Royal North Shore Hospital
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital
      • Innsbruck, Austria, A-6020
        • Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
      • Berlin, Germany, D-10117
        • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
      • Dresden, Germany, 01062
        • Technische Universität Dresden
      • Jena, Germany, 07747
        • Universitätsklinikum Jena
      • Munich, Germany, 81377
        • LMU München, Klinikum Großhadern
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul National University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
        • UniversitätsSpital Zürich
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • University of Southern California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford University Hospital
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113
        • Swedish Medical Center
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale New Haven Hospital
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40241
        • Norton Neuroscience Institute
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Tulane Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland Medical Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston University Medical Center
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • University of Massachusetts Worcester
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Hospital
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49506
        • Spectrum Health Hospitals
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87131
        • The University of New Mexico Health Science Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Hospital
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University, New York - Presbyterian Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214
        • Riverside Methodist Hospital
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97225
        • Providence St Vincent Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Hershey Medical Center
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Rhode Island Hospital
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37403
        • Erlanger Health System Baroness Hospital
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • Harborview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Admitted with a primary neurological diagnosis of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage
  2. Prior to onset of acute symptoms, was considered functionally independent (mRS 0-2)
  3. Meets disease-specific criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Fever (≥38°C) prior to study enrollment
  2. Pre-existing neurological, psychiatric, or other condition that would confound neurological assessment or would make it difficult to accurately assess neurologic and/or functional outcome
  3. Has a pre-morbid condition with poor likelihood of survival to 6 months
  4. Has a pre-morbid mRS ≥3
  5. Diagnosed with brain death
  6. Is undergoing therapeutic hypothermia therapy
  7. Has sustained neurological injury felt to be catastrophic with little chance of recovery
  8. Has a skin condition in which the use of the ArcticGel Pads is contraindicated (i.e., skin that has signs of ulceration, burns, hives, or rash)
  9. Has poor skin integrity or poor tissue perfusion
  10. Participation in a concurrent investigational / interventional study (medical device or drug)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fever Prevention
Fever will be prevented using a surface targeted temperature management system
Prophylactic normothermia
Other Names:
  • Arctic Sun 5000 Temperature Management System
Active Comparator: Standard Care
Standard care in which fever may spontaneously develop
No intervention to control temperature unless fever occurs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fever Burden
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
Daily average fever burden (°C-hour)
Up to 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events
Time Frame: From date of randomization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
An untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or unanticipated complication
From date of randomization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Primary Neurologic Outcome: Modified Rankin Scale Short-Term
Time Frame: 3-months post injury
Modified Rankin Scale is a 6-category outcome measurement with 0 = no limitations, no symptoms and 6 = death.
3-months post injury
Other Neurologic Outcomes: NIH Stroke Scale Short-Term
Time Frame: 3-months post injury
NIH Stroke Scale is a systematic, quantitative assessment tool to measure stroke-related neurological deficit. Scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
3-months post injury
Other Neurologic Outcomes: Barthel Index Short-Term
Time Frame: 3-months post injury
Barthel Index is an assessment of functional independence. Scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse outcome.
3-months post injury
Other Neurologic Outcomes: Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended Short-Term
Time Frame: 3-months post injury
Glasgow Outcome Scale assesses functional outcome after acute brain injury. Scores range from 1-8, with lower scores indicating worse outcome.
3-months post injury
Other Neurologic Outcomes: Montreal Cognitive Assessment Short-Term
Time Frame: 3-months post injury
Montreal Cognitive Assessment assesses for cognitive impairment. Scores range from 0-30, with lower scores indicating worse outcome.
3-months post injury
Primary Neurologic Outcome: Modified Rankin Scale Mid-Term
Time Frame: 6-months post injury
Modified Rankin Scale is a 6-category outcome measurement with 0 = no limitations, no symptoms and 6 = death.
6-months post injury
Other Neurologic Outcomes: NIH Stroke Scale Mid-Term
Time Frame: 6-months post injury
NIH Stroke Scale is a systematic, quantitative assessment tool to measure stroke-related neurological deficit. Scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
6-months post injury
Other Neurologic Outcomes: Barthel Index Mid-Term
Time Frame: 6-months post injury
Barthel Index is an assessment of functional independence. Scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse outcome.
6-months post injury
Other Neurologic Outcomes: Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended Mid-Term
Time Frame: 6-months post injury
Glasgow Outcome Scale assesses functional outcome after acute brain injury. Scores range from 1-8, with lower scores indicating worse outcome.
6-months post injury
Other Neurologic Outcomes: Montreal Cognitive Assessment Mid-Term
Time Frame: 6-months post injury
Montreal Cognitive Assessment assesses for cognitive impairment. Scores range from 0-30, with lower scores indicating worse outcome.
6-months post injury
Primary Neurologic Outcome: Modified Rankin Scale Long-Term
Time Frame: 12-months post injury
Modified Rankin Scale is a 6-category outcome measurement with 0 = no limitations, no symptoms and 6 = death.
12-months post injury
Major Adverse Events
Time Frame: From date of randomization until end of study, assessed up to 12 months
MAEs defined as one of the following: pneumonia, sepsis, malignant cerebral edema, death
From date of randomization until end of study, assessed up to 12 months
Number of Participants With Infection
Time Frame: From date of randomization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Healthcare associated infection
From date of randomization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Number of Subjects With Shivering
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
Shivering greater than or equal to 1 on the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale (BSAS). BSAS scores range from 0-3 with 0 indicating no shivering noted and 3 indicating severe shivering involving gross movements of the trunk and upper and lower extremities.
Up to 14 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 7-day (or hospital discharge); 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Mortality
7-day (or hospital discharge); 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: From date of randomization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Overall hospitalization duration
From date of randomization until hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days
ICU Length of Stay
Time Frame: From date of randomization until ICU discharge
ICU Duration
From date of randomization until ICU discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David M. Greer, MD, MA, Boston University
  • Principal Investigator: Kevin N. Sheth, MD, Yale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Targeted Temperature Management

3
Subscribe