Assessment of Mobilization Cost for Multiple Myeloma Using 2 Different Mobilization Strategies (MOZOBIL)

December 16, 2016 updated by: Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome

Assessment of Mobilization Cost for Multiple Myeloma Using 2 Different Mobilization Strategies: High-dose Cyclophosphamide Versus Plerixafor

This is a retrospective observational cohort database analysis. The study will review retrospectively the records of patients undergoing a first peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for multiple myeloma in the databases from approximately 15 hospitals which are part of the IFM collaborative group. Patient records will be divided into two groups of 50 patients minimum, maximum 100 patients or up to the number of patient records that could be extracted. The first group of patients will have received plerixafor plus G-CSF without the administration of chemotherapy as a mobilization strategy and a second group of patients will have received cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF as a mobilization strategy.

All consecutive patients with complete set of data (and who underwent apheresis) treated between 2009 and 2013 with G-CSF and plerixafor and all consecutive patients with complete data (and who underwent apheresis) treated between 2009 and 2013 with G-CSF and cyclophosphamide will be included.

All data that will be analyzed will be extracted from the selected IFM institutions which are located in France.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • CHRU DIjon
      • Limoges, France, 87042
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Limoges
      • Lyon, France, 69495
        • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
      • Nantes, France, 44035
        • CHRU Hôtel Dieu
      • Paris, France, 75571
        • Hopital Saint-Antoine
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • La Pitié Salpêtrière
      • Paris, France, 75005
        • Institut Curie Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer (CLCC)
      • Reims, France, 51092
        • Hôpital Robert Debré Hématologie
      • Rouen, France, 76038
        • Centre Henri Becquerel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The first group of patients will have received plerixafor plus G-CSF without the administration of chemotherapy as a mobilization strategy and a second group of patients will have received cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF as a mobilization strategy.

All consecutive patients with complete set of data (and who underwent apheresis) treated between 2009 and 2013 with G-CSF and plerixafor and all consecutive patients with complete data (and who underwent apheresis) treated between 2009 and 2013 with G-CSF and cyclophosphamide will be included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hematology patients diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma who are candidates for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) upfront.
  • Age > 18 years
  • Undergone prior successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with Cyclophosphamid or Plerixafor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years;
  • Primary diagnosis other than Multiple Myeloma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Cohort 1
All consecutive patients with complete set of data (and who underwent apheresis) treated between 2009 and 2013 with G-CSF and plerixafor
Cohort 2
All consecutive patients with complete data (and who underwent apheresis) treated between 2009 and 2013 with G-CSF and cyclophosphamide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total cost of stem cell mobilization procedure (including remobilisation if applicable)
Time Frame: 2009-2013
2009-2013

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of visits for administration of mobilizing agents
Time Frame: 2009-2013
2009-2013
Duration (days) of administration of mobilizing agents
Time Frame: 2009-2013
2009-2013
Agents used as mobilizing agents
Time Frame: 2009-2013
2009-2013
Attainment of CD34+ target (yes, no) (min 2.106 cells/kg, ideal >4.106cells/kg)
Time Frame: 2009-2013
2009-2013
Number of days needed to meet CD34+ target level (min 2.106 cells/kg, ideal >4.106cells/kg)
Time Frame: 2009-2013
2009-2013

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Xavier Leleu, Dr, Service des maladies du sang, Hôpital Huriez, CHRU, Lille
  • Study Director: Denis Caillot, Dr, Service d'Hématologie Clinique, Hôpital Le Bocage, CHU Dijon
  • Study Director: Eric Deconinck, Pr, Hématologie, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, CHU Besançon
  • Study Director: Samuel Limat, Pr, Pharmacie centrale, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, CHU Besançon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

3
Subscribe