The Study of CCTM and Common Diseases

December 16, 2016 updated by: Zihui Tang, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine

the Association Study of Constitution of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Common Diseases

This study aimed to explore the associations between constitutions of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and common disease (CD). A large-scale, community-based, cross-sectional study was performed to investigate the associations. A total of 3748 participants were available for analysis in this study. The assessment of constitution of TCM was based on recommendations of Association Chinese Medicine in China. In this study, the diagnosis of CD was based on self-reported medical history. The associations were analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression (MLR).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aimed to explore the associations between constitutions of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and common disease (CD). A large-scale, community-based, cross-sectional study was performed to investigate the associations. A total of 3748 participants were available for analysis in this study. The assessment of constitution of TCM was based on recommendations of Association Chinese Medicine in China. In this study, the diagnosis of CD was based on self-reported medical history. The associations were analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression (MLR).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3748

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

A risk-factor study for constitution of TCM and chronic disease was conducted in a random sample of the Chinese population. Participants aged 30-90 years were recruited from rural and urban communities in Shanghai. More than 4,000 participants were invited to a screening visit between 2011 and 2013. Written consent was obtained from all patients before the study, which was performed in accordance with the ethical standards in the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Medicine Ethical Committee of the Huashan Hospital. The exclusion criteria were 1) severity renal and liver function abnormal and 2) pregnant woman. A total of 3748 participants were available to data analysis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants aged 30-90 years were recruited from rural and urban communities in Shanghai.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severity renal and liver function abnormal and pregnant woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hypertension
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
questionaire
through study completion, an average of 2 year
diabetes mellitus
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
questionaire
through study completion, an average of 2 year
coronary artery disease
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
questionaire
through study completion, an average of 2 year
COPD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
questionaire
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Obesty
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
calculation from height and weight
through study completion, an average of 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

3
Subscribe