Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Adults With Active Noninfectious Uveitis (HUMBOLDT)

December 23, 2021 updated by: Gilead Sciences

A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Subjects With Active Noninfectious Uveitis

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of filgotinib versus placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of noninfectious uveitis as measured by the percentage of participants failing treatment for active noninfectious uveitis by Week 24.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Western Australia
      • Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • Lions Eye Institute
      • Vancouver, Canada, V5Z 0E9
        • Retina Consultants
      • Münster, Germany
        • St. Franziskus Hospital
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Hadassah Medical Center
      • Remuera, New Zealand, 1050
        • Auckland Eye
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L7 8XP
        • Royal Liverpool University Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Central Mancester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital
      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Eye Research Group Oxford, Oxford Eye Hospital
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94303
        • Stanford Byers Eye Institute
    • Colorado
      • Golden, Colorado, United States, 80401
        • Colorado Retina Associates PC
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Medical Group
      • Oak Park, Illinois, United States, 60304
        • Illinois Retina Associates
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • Associated Retinal Consultants PC
    • New Jersey
      • Palisades Park, New Jersey, United States, 07650
        • Metropolitan Eye Research and Surgery Institute
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Eye Center
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44191
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation-Cole Eye Institute
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health Science University-Casey Eye Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Mid Atlantic Retina
    • Texas
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
        • Texas Retina Associates - Fort Worth
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78240
        • Foresight Studies, LLC
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin-Madison

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Is diagnosed with active noninfectious intermediate-, posterior-, or pan-uveitis
  • Must have active uveitic disease at the Day 1/Baseline visit as defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following parameters in at least one eye despite 2 weeks of maintenance therapy with oral prednisone (≥ 10 mg/day to ≤ 60 mg/day) or an oral corticosteroid equivalent:

    • Active, inflammatory, chorioretinal and/or inflammatory retinal vascular lesion
    • ≥ 2+ anterior chamber cells per the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria
    • ≥ 2+ vitreous haze per the National Eye Institute/Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (NEI/SUN) criteria
  • No evidence of active tuberculosis (TB) or untreated latent TB

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with elevated intraocular pressures and/or severe glaucoma
  • Confirmed or suspected infectious uveitis, including but not limited to infectious uveitis due to TB, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 (HTLV-1), Whipple's disease, Herpes Zoster virus (HZV), Lyme disease, toxoplasmosis and herpes simplex virus (HSV)

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Filgotinib
Participants will receive filgotinib 200 milligrams (mg) once daily for up to 52 weeks along with a standardized prednisone burst of 60 milligrams per day (mg/day) at Day 1/Baseline followed by a protocol-defined mandatory taper schedule up to Week 15.
Tablet(s) administered orally
Other Names:
  • GS-6034
  • GLPG0634
Tablet(s) administered orally
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive placebo to match filgotinib once daily for up to 52 weeks along with a standardized prednisone burst of 60 mg/day at Day 1/Baseline followed by a protocol-defined mandatory taper schedule up to Week 15.
Tablet(s) administered orally
Tablet(s) administered orally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Failing Treatment for Active NonInfectious Uveitis by Week 24
Time Frame: Week 6 through Week 24
Treatment failure was a participant meeting at least 1 of these criteria in at least 1 eye: New active, inflammatory lesions relative to Day 1/Baseline (all visits starting Week (Wk) 6); Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (change of Grade 0 to Grade 2+/Grade 0.5+ to Grade 3+) (all visits after Wk 6) relative to best state (RBS) achieved in Anterior Chamber (AC) cell grade (Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature [SUN] criteria)[AC cell grades range from 0 (0 cells) to 4+ (>50 cells), higher scores=severe uveitis]; Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (all visits after Wk 6) RBS achieved in Vitreous Haze (VH) grade (National Eye Institute [NEI]/SUN criteria)[VH grades range from 0 (no evident VH) to 4+ (optic nerve head is obscured), higher scores=severe uveitis]; Worsening of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by ≥15 letters RBS achieved (all visits starting Wk 6), measured by an eye chart, fewer correct letters=severe uveitis.
Week 6 through Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Treatment Failure on or After Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6 through Week 52
Treatment failure was a participant meeting at least 1 of these criteria in at least 1 eye: New active, inflammatory lesions relative to Day 1/Baseline (all visits starting Wk 6); Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (change of Grade 0 to Grade 2+/Grade 0.5+ to Grade 3+) (all visits after Wk 6) relative to best state (RBS) achieved in AC cell grade (SUN criteria) [AC cell grades range from 0 (0 cells) to 4+ (>50 cells), higher scores=severe uveitis]; Inability to achieve ≤Grade 0.5+ (at Wk 6) or 2-step increase (all visits after Wk 6) RBS achieved in VH grade (NEI/SUN criteria) [VH grades range from 0 (no evident VH) to 4+ (optic nerve head is obscured), higher scores=severe uveitis]; Worsening of BCVA by ≥15 letters RBS achieved (all visits starting Wk 6), measured by an eye chart, fewer correct letters=severe uveitis.
Week 6 through Week 52
Change in Vitreous Haze (VH) Grade in Each Eye (NEI/SUN Criteria), From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or End of Treatment (EOT) Visit or Early Termination (ET)
Time Frame: Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)
Grading of VH was based on the publication from the NEI which has also been adapted by the SUN working group. VH grades range from 0 (no evident VH) to 4+ (optic nerve head is obscured), with higher scores indicating greater severity of uveitis. A negative change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.
Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)
Change in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ET
Time Frame: Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)
The number of AC cells observed within a 1 mm × 1 mm slit beam were recorded for each eye. The reported number was used to determine the grade according to the SUN criteria. AC cell grades range from 0 (0 cells in field) to 4+ (>50 cells in field), with higher scores indicating more cells visible in the AC and greater severity of uveitis. A negative change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.
Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)
Change in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ET
Time Frame: Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)
BCVA is the best possible vision that an eye can achieve with the set of glasses or contact lenses. A refraction test was performed to measure the appropriate lens strength to focus light on the retina. Using the appropriate corrective lenses based on that visit's refraction, participant's BCVA was measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. In the ETDRS system, 15 letters is equal to a change in 3 lines of visual acuity. If the participant is unable to read letters on a testing chart, visual acuity is described as ranging from ability to count fingers, recognize hand movements, or light perception. The smaller BVCA score indicates greater severity of uveitis. A positive change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.
Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)
Log Change in Central Retinal Thickness in Each Eye, From Best State Achieved Prior to Week 6 to Week 52 or EOT Visit or ET
Time Frame: Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)
Central retinal thickness is measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Central retinal thickness is defined as the thickness of the retina in the center of the foveal pit (1 mm subfield). The larger central retinal thickness value indicates greater severity of uveitis. A negative change from best state value obtained prior to Week 6 indicates improvement.
Prior to Week 6; Up to Week 52 or EOT or ET (maximum: 53 weeks)
Time to Development of Macular Edema in At Least One Eye on or After Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6 through Week 52
Time in weeks until the development of Macular edema or Week 52 or EOT or ET. Macular edema is determined by OCT and is defined as central retinal thickness ≥ 300 microns if using Cirrus machine, or ≥ 315 microns if using Spectralis machine.
Week 6 through Week 52
Plasma Concentration of Filgotinib
Time Frame: Day 1 post dose, Weeks 4 and 6 predose, Week 12 post dose, Weeks 24, 36, 52 (EOT), ET at any time
Day 1 post dose, Weeks 4 and 6 predose, Week 12 post dose, Weeks 24, 36, 52 (EOT), ET at any time
Plasma Concentration of Metabolite, GS-829845
Time Frame: Day 1 post dose, Weeks 4 and 6 predose, Week 12 post dose, Weeks 24, 36, 52 (EOT), ET at any time
Day 1 post dose, Weeks 4 and 6 predose, Week 12 post dose, Weeks 24, 36, 52 (EOT), ET at any time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 29, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Noninfectious Uveitis

Clinical Trials on Filgotinib

3
Subscribe