Multimodal Oral Analgesia for Trauma in the Emergency Department (START)

August 2, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Multimodal Oral Analgesia for Trauma in the Emergency Department: a Prospective Observational Study of a Nurse-directed Protocol

The prevalence of pain in the emergency department is estimated between 60% and 78%. However, many studies reported oligo analgesia in about half of patient admitted to the emergency department. The delay before effective analgesia is one of the main causes of oligoanalgesia. The use of nurse-directed protocol allows the administration of analgesic upon admission to the emergency department. Nevertheless the need of intravenous access may delay analgesia. The use of oral form analgesics even with immediate release does not allow effective analgesia before 20 min. Pain management protocol in the emergency reception desk of CHU Grenoble Alpes (CHUGA) includes paracetamol that can be combined with oxycodone tablets depending on the pain intensity. For any mono traumatized it is possible to associate self-administer methoxyflurane inhaler. The pain management protocol is already used in the emergency reception desk of CHU Grenoble Alpes.The different analgesics( paracetamol,oral oxycodone, methoxyflurane) are already administered as part of routine care.The use of these different analgesics means would allow a rapid and adapted effectiveness to the pain intensity. However, there are no data on the efficacy and acceptability of such an early multimodal analgesia protocol in the emergency department.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

200 Patients will be included from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm and will receive a multimodal analgesia under the nurse-directed pain management protocol (paracetamol +/- oral oxycodone +/- methoxyflurane) as part of routine medical care.

The pain will be evaluated (Numerical rating scale) prior to the administration and reassessed by a nurse every 5 minutes for 30 minutes and then at 45min and 1 hour after administration of the pain protocol. Satisfaction of patients and caregivers will also be assessed at the end of care.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Auvergne Rhonalpes
      • Grenoble, Auvergne Rhonalpes, France, 38043
        • Emergency Department of University Hospital Grenoble

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient admitted at the emergency for non-multiple trauma pain

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients : ≥ 18 year and older
  • Trauma pain
  • NRS≥ 4
  • Non- opposition to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Trauma with at least one of the following severity criteria:

    • Suspected (from mechanism) or confirmed multiple trauma
    • State of shock
    • Suspected or proven trauma to the thorax (excluding isolated rib fractures with Spo2 ≥ 98%)
    • Suspected or proven Abdominal trauma
    • Suspected or proven pelvic trauma
    • Severe traumatic brain injury
  • Altered level of consciousness (Glasgow score < 15)
  • Patients who took any analgesic within 4 hours prior to admission (except paracetamol)
  • Use of nitrous oxide in the hour before admission
  • Patient requiring an intravenous access at admission (e.g. : open fracture displaced)
  • Hypersensitivity to one of the molecules of the analgesia protocol
  • Known pregnant or likely to be pregnant women at the time of inclusion
  • Subject in an exclusion period from another study
  • Subjects under tutelage or subjects deprived of liberty
  • Patients to be unable to understand the purpose of study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with a score of less than or equal to 3 on a pain Numeric Rating scale (NRS) (0-10) 15 minutes after inclusion
Time Frame: 15 minutes after inclusion
NRS scale (0-10)
15 minutes after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary efficacy criteria
Time Frame: 15, 30 and 45 min (after inclusion)
Delay of pain relief defined by a 2 point reduction in the NRS scale (0-10)
15, 30 and 45 min (after inclusion)
Number of patient with 30% reduction in pain intensity
Time Frame: 15,30 and 45 min (after inclusion)
NRS scale (0-10)
15,30 and 45 min (after inclusion)
Satisfaction of caregiver and patient
Time Frame: 1h after inclusion
Patient and caregiver satisfaction evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS), covering the whole range of analgesic management and in particular each component of multimodal analgesia. The VAS scale ranges are : (not at all satisfied I will not take again - quite satisfied i will take again) for the patient and (not at all satisfied i will not give again - quite satisfied i will give again) for the caregiver
1h after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maxime MAIGNAN, MD PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 6, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 6, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 38RC17.157
  • RCB-2017-A01706-47 (Other Identifier: Ethic committee [CPP])

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

3
Subscribe