Citicholine-Amantadine Trial in Traumatic Brain Injury

February 6, 2018 updated by: Dina Salah Eldin Mahmoud Badre, Ain Shams University
This randomized study aims at comparing between the effects of amantadine, citcholine and its combinations on arousal and behavioral consequences in early phase of moderate Traumatic Brain injury (TBI).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

As both agents amantadine and citcholine showed considerable effects on neuro-recovery from TBI, The investigators hypothesized that combination therapy of both drugs will have significant effect as it simultaneously will target multiple mechanisms of injury. So, this randomized study aims at comparing between the effects of amantadine, citcholine and their combinations on arousal and behavioral consequences in early phase of moderate TBI

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11591
        • Ain Shams University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sustained moderate non-penetrating TBI with GCS of 9-12

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mild (GCS > 12) or severe TBI (GCS < 9)
  • Patients suffering from any central nervous system disability prior to the traumatic brain injury
  • Major medical problems as; major cardiovascular disease or heart failure, renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, less than 60 ml per minute), liver impairment,
  • Pregnancy,
  • More than one seizure in the previous month,
  • Prior treatment with amantadine,
  • Allergy to the study drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group C
Citicholine Drug
Patients will receive 1 gram (2 vials of citicholine; each 500 mg) every 12 hours given slowly intravenous over 10 minutes for 7 days then oral form of the drug will be used. Participants who can swallow will receive 500-mg (5ml volume; 100mg/ml) oral drops (syrup) twice a day. Participants who cannot swallow will receive the same dose as oral drops syrup of citicoline through a nasogastric (NG) tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube in a total dose of 1000 mg/day for the remainder of the 30 days study period.
Experimental: Group A
Amantadine Drug
Patients will receive 200 mg of amantadine sulphate in a 500 ml solution every 12 hours by slow intravenous infusion over a period of 4 hours for 7 days then oral form will be used. Participants who can swallow will receive two 100-mg tablets twice a day. Participants who cannot swallow will receive the tablets of amantadine through a NG tube or PEG tube as 400 mg via crushed tablets with a 25-mL saline or water flush for the remainder of the 30 days study period.
Experimental: Group D
Both Citocholine and Amantadine
Patients will receive 1 gram (2 vials of citicholine; each 500 mg) every 12 hours given slowly intravenous over 10 minutes for 7 days then oral form of the drug will be used. Participants who can swallow will receive 500-mg (5ml volume; 100mg/ml) oral drops (syrup) twice a day. Participants who cannot swallow will receive the same dose as oral drops syrup of citicoline through a nasogastric (NG) tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube in a total dose of 1000 mg/day for the remainder of the 30 days study period.
Patients will receive 200 mg of amantadine sulphate in a 500 ml solution every 12 hours by slow intravenous infusion over a period of 4 hours for 7 days then oral form will be used. Participants who can swallow will receive two 100-mg tablets twice a day. Participants who cannot swallow will receive the tablets of amantadine through a NG tube or PEG tube as 400 mg via crushed tablets with a 25-mL saline or water flush for the remainder of the 30 days study period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Galsgow coma scale
Time Frame: 30 days
Neurological scale which aims to give a reliable and objective way of recording the conscious state of a person for initial as well as subsequent assessment. A patient is assessed against the criteria of the scale, and the resulting points give a patient score between 3 (indicating deep unconsciousness) and 15 (full conscious).
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
disability rating scale (DRS)
Time Frame: 30 days
The Disability Rating Scale (DRS) was developed and tested with older juvenile and adult individuals with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The maximum score a patient can obtain on the DRS is 29 (extreme vegetative state). A person without disability would score zero. The DRS rating must be reliable, i.e., obtained while the individual is not under the influence of anesthesia, other mind-altering drugs, recent seizure, or recovering from surgical anesthesia.
30 days
Mini Mental scale (MMS)
Time Frame: 30 days

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a 30-point questionnaire that is used extensively in clinical and research settings to measure cognitive impairment.

Any score greater than or equal to 24 points (out of 30) indicates a normal cognition. Below this, scores can indicate severe (≤9 points), moderate (10-18 points) or mild (19-23 points) cognitive impairment.

30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intensive Care Unit

3
Subscribe