Comparative Effectiveness of HIPEC Following Interval Debulking Surgery in Patients With Advanced-stage Ovarian Cancer

July 3, 2019 updated by: Suk-Joon Chang, Ajou University School of Medicine

Comparative Effectiveness of HIPEC Following Interval Debulking Surgery in Patients With Advanced-stage Ovarian Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study

Ovarian cancer is a lethal malignancy and reported as a fifth leading cause of death in all age in the developed country. Most of the ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at advanced stages due to an inadequate screening tool and a lack of clinical symptoms. Optimal cytoreductive surgery with no gross residual disease followed platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been the most effective therapeutic strategy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. However, the optimal surgical procedure is not always possible, especially in patients with extensive disease or women with poor performance status. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) followed interval debulking surgery (IDS) is an alternative therapeutic option for these patients. There is growing interest in the use of HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy) for ovarian cancer, and early data on HIPEC as a component of front-line therapy of advanced ovarian cancer are encouraging. However, intraperitoneal chemotherapy is not actively used in the treatment of ovarian cancer due to the catheter-related complications or inconvenience. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HIPEC after interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

GOG 172 trial showed a dramatic improvement of overall survival in patients with stage III disease treated with intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel compared with those with intravenous administration. Currently, prospective cohort study showed a survival benefit of intraperitoneal chemotherapy compared with intravenous chemotherapy. Despite this improvement, intraperitoneal chemotherapy is not widely used as standard therapy owing to the high rate of adverse effects and inconvenience of administering therapy intraperitoneally. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a multi-modal approach with combined intraperitoneal chemotherapy and hyperthermia. It maintains the theoretical benefit of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and reduces most of the adverse events from catheter-related problems with delivery of the chemotherapeutic agent at the end of surgery. In addition, hyperthermia increases the penetration of chemotherapy at the peritoneal surface and chemo-sensitivity. In this trial, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HIPEC procedures performed after interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

204

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Gyeonggi
      • Suwon, Gyeonggi, Korea, Republic of, 16499
        • Recruiting
        • Ajou University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients histologically diagnosed with EOC (epithelial ovarian cancer), fallopian tubal cancer or primary peritoneal cancer.
  2. patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery due to expected suboptimal residual disease at the time of primary surgery.
  3. patients who had diagnostic laparoscopy before NAC and confirmed with tumor burden, Fagotti score ≥8.
  4. ECOG performance status (0~2)
  5. lab findings Bone marrow function : ANC>1,500/mm3, Platelet >100,000/mm3, Hemoglobin>10.0g/dl Kidney function : creatinine<1.25xUNL Liver function: AST, ALT< x1.5UNL, bilirubin<1.5mg/dl
  6. Live expenctancy > 6 month
  7. Age > 19 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with treated with primary debulking surgery
  2. Patients with double primary cancer ( exception: patients with early breast cancer or endometrial cancer that will not affect the clinical course of ovarian cancer)
  3. Patients with pregnant or breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: NAC-IDS-HIPEC
Under the clinicians' decision, HIPEC procedures will be performed at the time of IDS.
HIPEC(paclitaxel 175mg/m2, 90min; open or closed technique) after IDS . IDS is recommended within 4 weeks after the 3rd NAC cycle. HIPEC procedure is allowed only in case of residual disease less than 5mm.
NO_INTERVENTION: NAC-IDS
Under the clinicians' decision, HIPEC procedures will not be performed at the time of IDS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: up to 5 years
From the study enrollment to the disease progression
up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate
Time Frame: up to 1 years
rate of patients with partial or complete response (RECIST criteria version 1.1 ) after primary treatment
up to 1 years
Overall survival
Time Frame: up to 5 years
From study enrollment to the patients death
up to 5 years
Adverse drug reaction
Time Frame: up to 1 years
Incidence of grade 3 or 4 drug adverse reaction (NCI CTCAE version 4.03)
up to 1 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suk-Joon Chang, MD, PhD, Ajou University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 26, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trials on HIPEC

3
Subscribe