Predictive Factors of Short/Long-term Outcome and Complications of Bilateral DBS in PD (PREDIMPSTIM)

January 28, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Étude Des Facteurs prédictifs Des Effets Cliniques et Des Complications à Court et Long Terme de la Stimulation cérébrale Profonde Des Noyaux Sous-thalamiques Dans la Maladie de Parkinson

The purpose and main objective of this study is the research of pre-operative and operative predictive factors of short-term (1-year) and long-term (15-years) improvement of quality of life, motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients who have undergone to bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation.

The hypothesis of the study is that the definition of pre-operative and operative predictive factors could be able to improve the pre-operative prognostic accuracy of outcome and complications after surgery, allowing also a better selection of the most suitable candidates for bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation.

For example, we can suppose that an older age at surgery, elevated axial score, a less preoperative dopa-responsiveness, the presence of mild executive dysfunction at surgery or an unfavourable social status, could negatively influence the short and long term surgery outcome

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Subthalamic NucleusDeep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS) represents a short and long-term effective treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Various randomized controlled trials have confirmed the superiority of STN-DBS compared to the best medical treatment in patients with advanced Parkinson disease in term of improvement of motor function and quality of life. On the other hand, STN- DBS is associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared to best medical treatment.

Data from previous meta-analysis have shown that only pre-operative dopa-responsiveness can predict the clinical efficacy and outcome of STN-DBS. In particular the improvement of STN-DBS on quality of life mainly concern the physical aspects of functioning with a lower improvement on social and cognitive aspects.

However, not all of PD symptoms respond similarly to STN-DBS. In particular the effects of STN-DBS on the so-called levodopa unresponsive symptoms (i.e. gait and balance symptoms, autonomic dysfunction, sleep disorders, cognitive decline and speech and swallowing troubles) are modest or absent. Furthermore, levodopa unresponsive symptoms are one of the main causes of impairment and disability in advanced PD patients. Bearing in mind these informations, the clinical phenotyping of candidates for surgery appear crucial for the prediction of DBS outcome and selection of better candidates. In the recent years, several papers highlighted and expanded the list of possible predictive factors, from a motor point of view to non-motor symptoms and psychosocial aspects.

In this setting, the aim of our study is to determine the pre-operative and operative short-term (1-year) and long-term (15-years) predictive factors of improvement of quality of life and motor and non-motor symptoms in a large cohort of PD patients who have undergone to bilateral STN-DBS. The better definition of short-term and long-term predictive factors and its association with the different PD different clinical phenotypes could allow in the future a better definition of the effects of STN-DBS on quality of life and motor and non-motor symptoms in the different PD clinical phenotypes.

In the same way, it could be assumed that a better definition of pre-operative predictive factors of surgical, hardware and stimulation-induced STN-DBS side effects in the short term, could also allow a better definition of the risk-to-benefit ratio and outcome after STN-DBS surgery

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

420

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Moro

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with Parkinson's disease treated with bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Parkinson's disease treated with bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated with bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation not affected by Parkinson's Disease
  • Patients with Parkinson's disease treated with unilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) section I, II, III, IV, V, VI scores
Time Frame: pre-operative evaluation, 1-year and 15-years after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) has been developed for the clinical evaluation of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. It allows the assessment of both motor and non-motor symptoms associated with PD
pre-operative evaluation, 1-year and 15-years after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients that developed Treatment-Related (drug-related or DBS-related) complications
Time Frame: 1 year after bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation

Surgical-related complications, post-operative complications related to DBS devices and hardware, complications related to STN stimulation or drug administration.

Post-operative complications directly related to STN stimulation.

1 year after bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation
Changes in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) total score and different subscale scores (Mobility; Activities of daily living; Emotional well being; Stigma; Social Support; Cognitions; Communication; Bodily discomfort)
Time Frame: pre-operative evaluation, 1-year and 15-years after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) is a short 39 item self-report health status questionnaire developed for evaluate the quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients.
pre-operative evaluation, 1-year and 15-years after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation
Changes in the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part I, II, III, IV scores
Time Frame: pre-operative evaluation, 1-year after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation
The Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the recent version of the UPDRS revised by the MDS. It allows the assessment of both motor and non-motor symptoms associated with PD
pre-operative evaluation, 1-year after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francesco Cavallieri, MD, CHU Grenoble Alpes
  • Study Director: Elena Moro, MD, PhD, CHU Grenoble Alpes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 11, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

3
Subscribe