Safety and Efficacy of PG102P for Uremic Pruritus in HD Patients (SNUG)

September 17, 2019 updated by: Chun Soo Lim, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital

Safety and Efficacy of PG102P for the coNtrol of prUritus in Patients underGoing Hemodialysis (SNUG Trial): Study Protocol for a Randomized Control Trial

In this study (SNUG trial), the investigators aim to investigate the anti-pruritic effect of PG102P in comparison with placebo in 80 patients undergoing HD.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which one group will be treated with PG102P (1.5 g/day) and the other with a placebo. It is an investigator-initiated clinical trial. A superiority trial is planned to test the hypothesis that PG102P is effective in relieving pruritus for patients with ESRD undergoing HD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 07061
        • Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age over 19 years
  2. Patients with adequate HD (Kt/V > 1.2)
  3. Maintenance patients undergoing HD with chronic pruritus
  4. Mean visual analog scale (VAS) over 4 of the last 5 days in the 14-day pre-observation period
  5. Participants who allowed to continue the anti-pruritic drug treatment at the same dosage and administration schedule as used at baseline throughout the study period
  6. Patients who agreed to participate in this trial and had written an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) > 1000 pg/mL within 1 month
  2. Serum potassium > 7.0 mg/dL
  3. HIV Ab (+)
  4. Aspartate transaminase (AST) (glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase) or alanine transaminase (ALT) (glutamic pyruvic transaminase) > 3 times the upper limit of normal
  5. Scheduled to have kidney transplantation within 3 months
  6. Cancer history with current treatment
  7. Active infection with current treatment
  8. Current itching with dermatologic diseases other than uremic pruritus
  9. Pregnancy, childbearing potential during the study period, or breastfeeding
  10. Allergy or hypersensitivity reaction to PG102P
  11. History of participating another clinical trial within 2 months or planning to participate another clinical trial
  12. Not eligible to participate this trial as researchers' decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: a treatment group
PG102P 1.5 g/day
Daily dose of 1.5g
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: a control group
placebo
Daily dose of placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS change from baseline
Time Frame: the change in VAS between visit 2 (week 0) and visits 3, 4, 5, and 6 (weeks 2, 4, 8, 10)
The primary endpoint is the change in VAS
the change in VAS between visit 2 (week 0) and visits 3, 4, 5, and 6 (weeks 2, 4, 8, 10)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum total IgE
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
immunoglobulin E
week 0, week 8
blood Eosinophil count
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
Eosinophil count
week 0, week 8
serum ECP
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
Eosinophil Cationic Protein
week 0, week 8
serum Ca
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
serum Calcium
week 0, week 8
serum P
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
serum Phosphorus,
week 0, week 8
serum K
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
serum Potassium
week 0, week 8
serum iPTH
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
intact parathyroid hormone
week 0, week 8
Questionnaire #1 (KDQOL, Kidney Disease and Quality of Life)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8

The KDQOL-SF 1.3 includes 43 kidney disease targeted items as well as 36 items that provide a generic core and a overall health rating items (SF-36). The lowest and highest scores of each items are set at 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better quality of life.

  1. Kidney disease targeted (number of items)

    Symptoms/Problems (12), Effects of kidney disease (8), Burden of kidney disease (4), Work status (2), Cognitive function (3), Quality of social interaction (3), Sexual function (2), Sleep (4), Social support (2), Dialysis staff encouragement (2), Patient satisfaction rating (1), Overall heath rating (1)

  2. SF-36 (number of items)

Physical functioning (10), Role-physical (4), Bodily pain (2), General health (5), Mental health (5), Role-emotional (3), Social functioning (2), Vitality (4)

week 0, week 8
Questionnaire #2 (BDI, Beck's Depression Inventory)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used psychometric tests for measuring the severity of depression. Each answer is scored 0-3 with a maximum score of 63 points, and higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

0-13: minimal depression, 14-19: mild depression, 20-28: moderate depression, 29-63: severe depression.

week 0, week 8
serum IL-31
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
inflammatory cytokine
week 0, week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VM_PG102P

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uremic Pruritus

3
Subscribe