Evaluation and Validation of Novel Diagnostic Tool for Allergists (AbioSCOPE)

July 25, 2018 updated by: François Spertini, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Evaluation and Validation of Novel Diagnostic Tool for Allergists (AbioSCOPE) in Volunteer Population With Respiratory Allergies

In this study, investigators evaluated for the first time the diagnostic efficacy of abioSCOPE® versus Phadia Laboratory System as an aid in the diagnosis of allergic diseases. Investigators targetted the agreement between test results obtained in abioSCOPE® and a laboratory reference method (Phadia Laboratory System, ThermoFisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden), considered as a quasi-gold standard in IgE (immunoglobulin E) antibody assays. Investigators also reported the medical decision taken by a panel of allergy experts who had access to patient history, skin tests and IgE antibody assay, but blinded to the method used, i,e, the reference method or the abioSCOPE® .

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with history of allergic rhinitis and asthma

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects examined at ambulatory medicine medicine center CHUV / PMU and for wich serum sample is required for the research of specific IgE (allergic patients, allergic group) or for any other reason (immunological) (non-allergic control patients, control group)
  • Subjects for which it is expected (allergic group subjects) or who will be asked (non-allergic control group) to perform a panel of standard prick tests as basic allergological investigation, including pollen birch, grasses, mites (D pter, D far), cat dander.
  • Obtain informed consent from each subject before any study procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of positive HIV-1 viremia by the ultra-sensitive method in the 12 months preceding the study.
  • Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine)
  • Chronic administration (more than 14 days) of immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs in the 6 months preceding the study for corticosteroids. This means a dose of Prednisone or equivalent substance greater than or equal to 0.5 mg per kg / day. Inhaled topical steroids are allowed.
  • Administration of any immunoglobulin, any immunotherapy or administration of some blood products in the 3 months preceding the study, or planned during the study period.
  • Any health condition or patient history, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the evaluation of the study's objectives.
  • Participation in another experimental protocol during the period of the study.
  • Demonstration, confirmation or suspicion of a condition of immunosuppression or immunodeficiency (including HIV infection) based on medical history and physical examination (no laboratory test).
  • A family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency.
  • Subjects taking any of the following medications: antihistamines in the week preceding the consultation, systemic steroids (inhaled or nasal steroids are allowed), anti-cytokines or cytokines, systemic interferon (injection local interferon α for the treatment of HPV is allowed) or treated with systemic chemotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic agreement between AbioSCOPE and Phadia Laboratory System
Time Frame: 12 months
Comparison of the diagnostic agreement obtain went clinical samples are measured with AbioSCOPE or with Phadia Laboratory System
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francois Spertini, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

3
Subscribe